Skip to main content

The Integrated Electronic Health System in Iranian health centers: benefits and challenges



Electronic Health Records (EHRs) were introduced to all Iranian medical universities in 2015 with the launch of Integrated Electronic Health System (which is known as SIB: a Persian backronym in Persian meaning apple), and a number of studies were conducted on SIB. However, most of these studies did not consider the benefits and challenges of adopting SIB in Iran. Therefore, the present study aimed to identify the benefits and challenges of SIB in health centers of Khuzestan Province, Iran.


This was a qualitative study using qualitative conventional content analysis conducted on 6 experts and 24 users of SIB in six health centers of three cities in Khuzestan province, Iran. The participants were selected using a purposeful sampling method. Maximum variation was considered in selecting the group of users, and snowball sampling was used in the group of experts. Data collection tool was semi-structured interview. Data analysis was performed using thematic analysis.


Overall, 42 components (24 for benefits and 18 for challenges) were extracted from the interviews. Common sub-themes and themes were identified for challenges and benefits. The components formed 12 sub-themes, and they were placed in 3 main themes, namely structure, process and outcome. 1) Structure included four sub-themes of Financial resources, Human resources, Facilities, and Access to the Internet; 2) Process involved three sub-themes of Training, Providing services, and Time and workload; and 3) Outcome incorporated five sub-themes of Quality of health services, Access, Safety and personal distance, Screening and evaluation, and Research.


In the present study, the benefits and challenges of adopting SIB were examined in three themes: structure, process, and outcome. Most of the identified benefits were related to the theme of outcome, and most of the identified challenges were related to the theme of structure. Based on the identified factors, by strengthening the benefits of SIB and also trying to eliminate or reduce its challenges, it is possible to institutionalize and use it more effectively in order to solve health problems.

Peer Review reports


In 2019, the World Health Organization defined e-health as the cost-effective and safe use of information and communication technologies to support health and health-related fields [1]. Given the rapid development of information technology and the tremendous potential of Electronic Health Records (EHRs), it seems these electronic systems will be the predominant form of health record systems and the basis for all patient-related communications in the near future [2]. EHR is a collection of information related to the health of citizens, from birth to death, which is stored continuously and electronically over time [3,4,5].

Various studies have acknowledged the benefits of EHR. These benefits include improved health care quality [6,7,8], customer satisfaction [9], on-time access to data [10], access to diverse clinical data [11], excellent capacity for storing and retrieving medical history, enhanced efficiency of healthcare systems [12], cost reductions, fewer medication errors, better data accessibility and tracking, and improved clinical outcomes [13]. Despite all their merits, the challenges associated with the adoption and application of EHRs have been reported in the literature [14]. These challenges are related to the integrity and availability of healthcare data and the possible risks for patient safety [15], information privacy [16], user resistance, poor technological knowledge, and insufficient computer skills, which may widen the gap between developing and developed countries [17, 18].

Secginli et al. assessed health professionals’ attitudes towards EHRs in primary health care settings in Turkey. Most of their respondents were satisfied with EHRs and agreed with it benefits but were against the barriers. However, the majority of the respondents agreed that EHRs are costly, need frequent revisions, and are frequently down [19]. In Ireland, the majority of the physicians and nurses agreed that EHR implementation improved patient care and safety, communication, and the legibility and clarity of patient care orders [20].

According to various studies in developed countries such as the United States, 13% of primary health care centers used EHRs in 2000, which increased to 49% in 2007 [21]. However, developing countries are at a disadvantage compared with developed countries due to their own challenges such as lack of technological, cultural, organizational, and legal infrastructure and the existence of human obstacles [22]. Developing countries, including Iran, are no exception when it comes to the developments related to the creation of EHR. In Iran, Integrated Electronic Health System (which is known as SIB: a Persian backronym in Persian meaning apple) was proposed by the Health Deputy of the Iranian Health Ministry for this purpose. It was put into operation in February 2015 [23], and to date, EHRs have been created for more than 73 million people in this system [24]. SIB has been launched in more than 36,000 urban and rural areas, with more than 130,000 healthcare personnel working with it [25]. Prior to SIB implementation, several electronic health record programs were tried in primary health care centers, all of which were rejected due to a myriad of factors [26]. Among the projects implemented in this field, SIB can be considered the most complete and up-to-date system because in addition to being online, it can connect to an integrated network that has a nationwide coverage [3].

All information related to households along with the type of health services required in community health centers is recorded in SIB. Some of the goals of SIB are: issuing EHRs for the public, creating a national database of health, providing integrated health services to the Iranian population throughout the country (especially low-income areas to increase social justice), providing health services based on specific needs of age groups, and establishing a referral system [3]. The most important functions of SIB include registration of people, registration of events, provision of health indicators, primary screening of diseases, immunization and vaccination system, geriatric care, pregnancy care, identification of risk factors of non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancers, strokes, and the mental health care system. According to the goals and general performance of SIB, the most important and common services are offered in the field of primary health care [24].

Due to the huge costs of setting up and using information systems, their incorrect selection and failure to address their weaknesses can lead to their failure [27]. Implementation and internalization of SIB were accompanied with ambiguities and lack of clarifications because the system was designed to meet the needs of all groups of clients, healthcare providers, managers, and screening experts of health programs, as well as policy makers and researchers. Despite the importance of SIB in health management of people, its design and implementation has also faced many challenges. One of the important challenges is that its performance and capabilities are to a large extent affected by the level of acceptance and satisfaction of users [23]. Kabir et al. assessed the satisfaction of users to be below the average level [23]. The results of Mohammadi Abnavi and Saeed's research showed that the quality of vaccination registration and its reporting was the strongest aspect of SIB while the performance of user entry and exit was the weakest [24]. Naqibzadeh and Safari also proposed solutions to strengthen SIB using the experience of users, which include items such as improving the reporting mechanism, providing alerts to perform vital and urgent operations regarding children and women, and identifying babies who whose follow-up care is due or overdue [28].

SIB was designed as the main information basis for health systems and is currently implemented all over the country; hence any problem in the performance of this system can affect the whole health system function [23]. Since the results of studies conducted on EHR in developed countries are not necessarily applicable in developing countries, it is necessary to conduct independent research in countries like Iran. If sufficient studies are not done, the challenges of these systems will not be identified, bringing about disruption in the service provision process and dissatisfaction of users and clients. Studies on SIB are more focused on topics such as the degree of the realization of its outcomes [26], evaluation of its usability [29], evaluation of its success [25], measurement of satisfaction with it [23] and evaluation of the level of acceptance of users [30, 31], and very few studies have investigated the challenges and benefits of SIB. The results of these few studies also indicate that more research is still needed on various dimensions of SIB in Iran, namely the structure, the process, and the outcome. To the best of our knowledge, no study has yet investigated the challenges and benefits of SIB based on the three items of structure, process, and outcome. Given the importance of achieving the goals and applications of SIB as well as the role of SIB in health information management in Iran and its effect on the quality of the service delivery process, a study addressing these dimensions will provide a deeper understanding of the subject. Therefore, this qualitative study was conducted to identify the challenges and benefits of SIB through a detailed examination of the views of SIB users and experts. By highlighting its strengths and proposing solutions to its challenges, the results of this study can provide the basis for improving the capabilities of SIB and making it more efficient so that it can be successfully implemented and provide better services. The qualitative method adopted in this study contributes to a better understanding of the data and people's points of view and making more valid conclusions from them in this regard. The present qualitative study aimed to identify the benefits and challenges of SIB in health centers of three cities in Khuzestan Province, Iran.


This section was prepared based on consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research(COREQ) guidelines.

Study design

Theoretical framework

This was a qualitative study using qualitative conventional content analysis carried out in 2020. It was aimed to identify the benefits and challenges of the Integrated Electronic Health System (aka SIB) in Iran. Qualitative content analysis is a research method for subjectively interpreting the content of qualitative data through a systematic classification process of coding and identifying themes [32].

Participants and sampling

The research population included experts, health care providers, and physicians using SIB, and the research sample involved 30 of these individuals. Participants of this study were selected from two main groups of users and experts. Three doctors and 21 health care providers (from different units in health centers) were the SIB users, and a group of six experts consisting of one system leader, three evaluation experts, one network development unit expert and one Information Technology (IT) expert were the SIB experts. The inclusion criteria for users was to have at least one year of experience in health centers and familiarity with SIB (at least one year of work experience with this system). The inclusion criteria for experts was at least one year of experience in the related profession.

The participants were selected through purposeful sampling. Maximum variation was considered in selecting the users group, and snowball sampling was used in the experts group. In order to increase the comprehensiveness of the research, the researchers interviewed individuals at different access levels and system users in different units of health centers. For this purpose, an attempt was made to include experts from different specialties related to SIB including evaluation, network development, and IT. On the other hand, users were different based on their position and field of education. Service providers were also selected from different units such as family health, nutrition, mental health, and midwifery. The interviews were conducted face-to-face. In this study, none of the participants wanted to withdraw from the study, and all selected individuals participated in the interviews.


Participants were selected from six health centers located in three cities (Ahvaz, Shoushtar & Omidiyeh) of Khuzestan province, Iran. These health centers are affiliated to Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences and provide primary health care services (such as family health, health education, nutrition, mental health, etc.) and play a significant role in facilitating the access of people living in cities to primary care and maintaining and improving health in these areas. SIB is implemented in these centers for electronic documentation of all services, identification and resolution of the health problems of the population covered, and management of large volumes of information. These three cities were the first in the province in which SIB was implemented. During the interviews, no other person was present except the interviewers and the participants.

Data collection

Semi-structured interviews including open-ended questions were designed to gather the respondents' views about SIB. The respondents were interviewed individually and face-to-face and were asked to provide their views about two primary questions: 1. What are the challenges of adopting SIB in health centers? 2. What are the benefits of adopting SIB in health centers?

Then based on the internal issues related to the system, the respondents were directed toward problems of different parts of SIB. Interviews lasted from 40 to 60 min depending on the respondents' time and willingness. Data collection continued until data saturation. Saturation is the most common principle for determining the adequacy of samples in qualitative studies, and achieving saturation has become an important and fundamental component in this type of research, which makes the data collection process valid. In “data saturation”, saturation is the point at which no more concepts or insights are identified. This means that the data starts to iterate, making more data collection redundant and indicating that the adequate sample size is obtained [33]. In the current study, saturation was judged when no new themes or information were identified from the interviews, thus the sampling and data collection process was stopped after last 3 informants did not provide new information.

The interviews were conducted by the second and third researchers who were MSc. students of health management and had prior experience conducting similar interviews. Both interviewers were female. None of the researchers were working in the mentioned health centers, and the interviewers introduced themselves to the research sites by obtaining a letter of introduction from the Research Deputy of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. The time and place of the interviews were agreed upon at the interviewees’ convenience. They agreed to be later called for further clarification. All interviews were recorded using a tape recorder, carefully listened to, and transcribed verbatim. An attempt was made to conduct the interviews without bias and to write only the whole content. The transcriptions of the interviews were provided to the participants to confirm their accuracy (member check) and they gave feedback on the transcripts. Negative/discrepant results were addressed and parts that did not express their views were corrected.

Data analysis

Thematic analysis was used to data analysis. In this study, data familiarization was achieved by writing interviews, reading the transcripts, and re-listening the recorded interviews. Then, the texts were coded and summarized. Two different coders coded the data on two separate occasions, and then the codes were compared, and conflicts were addressed. In this research, the main themes were already known, and after coding the initial interviews, subthemes were formed. The text was indexed using codes related to the themes and sub-themes of the conceptual framework. A chart was used to view all data. In the final step, the relationships between the concepts and the data of the charts were interpreted.

Ethical issues

The study started after obtaining approval from the Ethics Committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (Ref. ID.: IR.AJUMS.REC.1396.783). In addition, prior to commencement of the interview sessions, informed consent was obtained from the participants. The participants were clearly briefed on their right to withdraw from the study at any time even after the informed consent had been signed and the aims of the study and confidentiality of their personal information were explained.

Scientific trustworthiness of the results

In order to ensure the validity and truth of the data, we used Guba and Lincoln's four criteria of Credibility, Dependability, Confirmability, and Transferability [34]. To enhance the credibility of the findings, the participants were selected based on different groups of service provider teams, and sampling continued until data saturation. Also, the analysis results of the interviews were provided to the participants for confirmation. On the other hand, the review of data and results by the participants helped to identify the researchers' biases and remove them. Another way to increase the credibility of the data is to pay attention to the appropriate coverage of the data by themes and sub-themes, from which irrelevant data are removed and to which relevant data are included. Transferability of data was ensured by offering a comprehensive description of the subject, participants, data collection, and data analysis. Also, to increase the dependability of the research results, we used external check. The confirmability of findings was enhanced via investigator triangulation according to which more than one researcher is engaged in gathering, analyzing, and interpreting the data. The aim of investigator triangulation is to make the bias that may occur due to a single researcher’s fault less likely. The use of teamwork (investigator triangulation) reduced personal taste and controlled researchers' bias.


There were 30 interviewees in this study (24 users and 6 experts of SIB). The majority (n = 27) of the interviewees were female, and most of them were in the age range of 25 to 35 years and had a bachelor's degree. As far as work experience was concerned, 19 participants had 1–10 years of work experience and only 2 had managerial experience. Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics of the participants.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the interviewees

Totally, 42 components (24 components for benefits and 18 components for challenges) were extracted from the analysis. Three themes of Structure, Process, and Outcome were extracted from these components. The theme of Structure included four subthemes of “Financial resources”, “Human resources”, “Facilities”, and “Access to the Internet”; the theme of Process included three sub themes of “Training”, “Providing services” as well as “Time and workload”; the theme of Outcome included five subthemes of “Quality of health services”, “Access”, “Safety and personal distance”, “Screening and evaluation”, and “Research”. Extracted components and themes which highlighted benefits and challenges are presented in the following table.

In Table 2, components and sub-themes of the theme of Structure are classified based on benefits and challenges of SIB.

Table 2 Benefits and challenges of using SIB in health centers and frequency (%) of the participants who mentioned the statement (Theme of Structure)

Many interviewees cited financial resources as a significant factor in implementing SIB. Reduced costs associated with elimination of paperwork was one of the identified benefits. “After the implementation of SIB in the centers, the costs related to paperwork significantly reduced” (Participant 7). One of the challenges related to financial resources was the cost of continuous training of staff. “Due to the novelty of this system, SIB users need training to work with the system, which imposes costs on the health sector” (Participant 12). Another challenge in establishing SIB was related to the human resources. “Personnel who did not have sufficient experience of working with a computer did not readily accept the system and did not have sufficient motivation to work with it” (Participant 23).

Table 3 shows the components and subthemes related to benefits and challenges of adopting SIB for the theme of Process.

Table 3 Benefits and challenges of adopting SIB in health centers and frequency (%) of the participants who mentioned the statement (Theme of Process)

Some of the benefits and challenges that the interviewees expressed about this theme were related to time constraints and workload. They described the benefit of establishing SIB as follows: “We no longer need to search for information in the patient's health record in the archive, and we will have access to the information we need in a shorter time. This gives us more time to deal with other tasks (Participant 16). Some physicians stated that implementing SIB will increase their workload. “I am visiting and examining patients all the time and I do not have enough time to learn and use this system” (Participant 9).

Table 4 presents components and subthemes of benefits and challenges related to adopting SIB in health centers for the theme of Outcome.

Table 4 Benefits and challenges related to adopting SIB in health centers and frequency (%) of the participants who mentioned the statement (Theme of Outcome)

Most of the interviewees mentioned the benefits and challenges with respect to security and privacy. “With the implementation of SIB, the availability of people's health information is enhanced, but it must be born in mind that this data is accessible from different centers, and this may endanger its confidentiality” (Participant 26). Some experts believed that one of the most important challenges in establishing SIB is the possibility of registering fake data in system. “We must be aware that the services recorded by users in the system may not be actually provided to individuals, so serious planning is needed in order to control more accurate recording of services” (Participant 14). One of the important benefits mentioned by the interviewees was screening and evaluation. “Because in the previous methods, different people were recording information in paper records, we always had the problem of illegible paper records, which led to careless provision of services and waste of time, but with the implementation of SIB, this problem was also solved” (Participant 29).


Nowadays, many countries dedicate a part of their electronic health strategic plans to the design and implementation of EHR as one of their priorities [35]. Developing countries like Iran have also made efforts in this field. Considering the importance of continuous monitoring of these systems and the need to know their strengths and weaknesses, in the present study, the benefits and challenges of adopting SIB were classified into three themes of Structure, Process and Outcome based on the views elicited from users and experts of SIB in health centers.

SIB structure

The use of paper records is associated with problems such as increased costs of printing forms and folders [10]. One of the benefits identified in the theme of structure was the reduced costs of paper processes, which is in line with the results of Fakhrzad et al. [10]. In Ghayoomzade et al., reduced paperwork and coherent files were among the benefits mentioned by SIB users. They were very pleased to save paper and avoid cutting down more trees [36].

Most of the challenges related to human resources included lack of enough interest, rejection of the electronic system, and lack of incentives for users of the system. Users’ lack of sufficient interest should be carefully addressed because institutionalization and sustainability of EHR is almost impossible without the comprehensive participation of its users, and this sustainability is created when service providers are satisfied with SIB so that they can register services and information with sufficient interest [23]. Cho et al. showed that self-efficacy is the strongest factor affecting users' resistance to EHR adoption [37]. On the other hand, support from the government and insurance companies were among the significant facilitators suggested by other studies [38, 39]. In addition, older users and those who have little experience in working with computers were reported to be less willing to use EHRs. In another research, the satisfaction of SIB users had an inverse relationship with age [23]. Brumini et al. concluded that younger nurses had a positive attitude toward using EHRs [40].

Financial resources were another challenge cited by the respondents. In addition to telecommunication costs, most of the expenses were spent on buying and installing software and hardware and replacing paper documents by electronic records. Training the staff also calls for financial resources [41,42,43,44]. Furthermore, the secondary costs or the cost of permanent protection of the system include replacing defective hardware and upgrading software [41,42,43,44,45].

Another challenge identified by SIB users was the delay in delivery of facilities and support services. In other studies about SIB, SIB users were dissatisfied with lack of knowledge and inadequate response of SIB managers to questions regarding how to work with it [24] and the slow process of fixing the system's faults [27, 36]. In Abolghasemi et al., the component frequently emphasized by SIB users was the system support component [46]. The results of Tavakoli et al. also showed that the organizational and technical support of an information system will increase the motivation and willingness of users to use it [47]. Therefore, managers should pay more attention to providing timely and appropriate support services to SIB users.

Disconnection of the Internet during office hours was another major challenge identified in this study. The country's poor Internet infrastructure is one of the most important problems in provision of electronic health services in Iran. The SIB system has also been impaired or slowed down for this reason [3]. Enumerating the shortcomings in the communication infrastructure of Iran, Nasiripour et al. mentioned lack of proper telecommunication coverage and lack of Internet access in many parts of the country as the main barriers to the development of e-health [48]. Howard et al. and Laitinen et al. stated limited networks (Internet) as important barriers to successful EHR implementation [49, 50].

SIB process

One of the most important benefits identified for SIB was the easy visibility of the updated instructions. In a similar research, it was stated that observing the instructions in SIB is very useful because it scientifically shows the next steps, and these instruction are followed, subjective decisions are reduced [36]. In the present study, users considered time saving as a benefit of SIB due to removing redundant demands for information and statistics. Furthermore, Shachak et al. found that EHRs lead to fast recovery of past records of the patients, and improving service delivery to them [51], and these results are in line with the findings in the present study.

In the present study, the users of the system pointed to the challenges related to the training problems of the Process theme. They believed the number of courses, their length, and method of teaching did not match the diversity of EHR services, which is consistent with the research results of Hazhir et al. [26]. It can be concluded that the courses offered to health care personnel to improve their skills of using electronic system do not seem to be enough, and EHR designers and implementers need to make a closer connection between electronic systems and the trained staff to improve the immature health system of Iran [10]. Previous studies have found that computer skills of users have an impact on both practicality and user-friendliness of EHRs [52]. This can be accomplished by providing proper and adequate training on the systems. Columbus reported that the average understanding and attitude of the participants in using EHRs was 58% and 64%, respectively before training, which rose to 72% and 78% after training. In other words, training health care providers is a vital factor in improving their readiness to use the system [53]. In this regard, some studies stated that the most important factor affecting the successful implementation of electronic systems in the health system is preparation and thorough familiarization of human resources [54].

One of the challenges raised in the current research was that some services were not defined in SIB. Similar to the current research, a previous study introduced lack of definition and impossibility of registering all services provided by health care providers as one of the most important challenges of SIB, which causes dissatisfaction and unwillingness of providers to perform activities [36].

Another challenge in the Process theme is the time-consuming nature and workload of the system. SIB users pointed out that the large number of service recipients and the time-consuming completion of service registration in the system led to incomplete registration of services, which is consistent with the results of Jafari et al. [3]. In addition, in a similar study, the most important reason for service providers' dissatisfaction was the large volume and number of SIB items [23]. There are many challenges for physicians as end users of EHR that limit the potential of this record to facilitate their work and improve the quality of patient care [55]. Whether the use of EHR for physicians improves efficiency or not is still considered controversial [56]. Doctors complained that they did not enough time to learn and use the system. The results of a research conducted by Sim and Miller reported that the time-consuming nature of using the system was among the disadvantages that led to reduced communication between health care providers and patients [57]. However, in Shield et al., doctors believed the EHRs help them reduce wasting of time [58], which is not consistent with the findings of this study. Redesigning or revising SIB based on the needs of service providers, especially physicians who face high workloads, can increase its efficiency [29].

SIB outcome

Enhancing the quality of health services is one of the benefits of SIB as indicated by respondents. Similarly, in a study by Jebraeily et al., most positive views that the respondents held about adopting EHRs included increased quality of health services and improved documentation [59]. In another study, SIB's short message service for tracking and reminding prenatal care led to an increase in pregnant mothers’ satisfaction with the services provided [60]. The quality of vaccination services also increased. Following the results of some studies regarding the strength and proper performance of SIB in the field of vaccine registration [49], it can be argued that SIB during the prevalence of Covid-19 has also provided a suitable basis for vaccine registration and that this system can be very useful for rapid vaccination and thus taking a positive step towards controlling the disease. In other studies, the improvement of the quality of care after the adoption of EHR was stated [61,62,63].

One of the benefits of SIB was that it is not possible to edit information, which according to the participants, reduces the possibility of information distortion. Jafari et al. also listed the deletion-protection of recorded information and the ability to edit the care only up to the first 24 h as benefits of SIB [3]. In another related research, SIB users pointed to this benefit and believed that service providers should be able to have the necessary accuracy and be able to record information correctly in time [36].

The present study showed that the risk of patient health information loss is low and that SIB could lead to better documentation of the information. Previous studies have found that permanent retention of information, prevention of information loss, non-distortion of information [3], and improved documentation [36] were among the benefits of using SIB, which is in line with the results of the present study. According to the results of Moody et al. who investigated the nurses’ understanding, viewpoints, and preferences, 75% of nurses believed EHRs could improve documentation while 54% believed that with respect to confidentiality of information, the risk of EHRs is less than that of paper records. Furthermore, most of the nurses (81%) believed EHRs were “more of a help than hindrance to care” [64].

One of the important benefits identified in this study was quick and timely access to integrated information and information transfer. In this regard, the result of a similar study showed that integration and sharing of information using SIB is well possible and the availability of information in all health centers increases coordination in service delivery [26]. Gordon et al. also found that EHRs provide faster access to patient information for users by enabling data sharing [65]. Shahmoradi et al. introduced “quick and timely access to information” as the most important strength of EHR implementation from the point of view of managers [4].

Another benefit, according to the present study, was the simplification of the process of information report. Jafari et al. also mentioned the following as the main advantages of SIB: providing a general and fast report graphically and ease of communication with higher levels [3]. The results of another research also showed that the reporting feature has made good progress in improving SIB compared to the past [24]. The findings of Bitaraf et al. also showed that the provision of detailed reports was one of the factors influencing the satisfaction of SIB users [25]. Contrary to the results of the present study, it was reported in another study that SIB users raised problems such as the inconsistency between the deputy's report and the comprehensive health service center's report and failure in center-specific extraction of data from vital horoscope for reporting [36]. SIB made possible providing fast reporting of health information for providers as it removed paperwork and facilitated information transfer. Therefore, managers can have access to facts and figures of their area and consider screening of their staff [26]. As Miller and Sim reported, exchange of information via EHRs has several benefits including elimination of paper-based and parallel reports and making it possible for users to experience ubiquitous and easy reporting of information [57].

Confidentiality and privacy of information discussed under the theme of Outcome was another concern voiced by the users and evaluators working with the EHR system. In a similar study, the possibility of information loss was the main concern of EHRs users [66]. The confidentiality of the records is threatened by the fact that all staff can access the information and that there are hackers and perpetrators who may violate this confidentiality [10]. Hence, there is an urgent need for healthcare organizations to find strategies to help secure the EHR [67]. Also, in order to ensure information security and legal follow-up in case of disruption, appropriate legal infrastructure is needed [3]. The study of Farzandipour et al. shows that Iran does not have comprehensive requirements regarding the safety of electronic health record information, and using the experiences of successful countries in this regard is effective [68]. Addressing EHR security and privacy challenges, Keshta & Odeh recommended that an efficient encryption scheme that can be easily applied by healthcare professionals be implemented in the latest EHR revisions [67].

Another challenge identified for SIB was the possibility of registering fake services. This challenge of SIB was also mentioned in a similar study which found that payment based on services sometimes leads to registration of fake, duplicate or unnecessary services in SIB [36]. In a study on the quality of SIB information recording, Gharaei et al. stated that the quality of this information may be compromised due to the dependence of part of the employees' income on the quality of information recording [69].

Considering that the current application of SIB which is mostly used for recording information and services, researchers are advised to study the possibility of developing a virtual network to provide services. In addition, a qualitative study can be conducted using the opinions of SIB designers and managers about the capabilities of this system to support the decision. Considering the identified challenges for SIB, it is suggested to conduct studies aimed at investigating the effectiveness and applicability of a large amount of information in order to solve health problems and to compare the various plans available to increase the confidentiality of information.


First, our study was limited to only three populations. It is necessary to use the opinions of more users and experts from different areas in Iran to evaluate benefits and challenges of SIB. As a consequence, care should be applied when generalizing the findings. In addition, it was difficult to conduct interviews with some SIB users and experts due to their high workload caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. To address this limitation, we arranged interviews with participant on several occasions.


In the present study, the benefits and challenges of SIB were examined in three themes: structure, process, and outcome. In theme of structure, reduction of costs related to paper processes and improving human resource management were the main benefits of SIB while lack of sufficient motivation among employees, the costs of converting the paper system into electronic system, and Internet disconnections during office hours were its major challenges. The main benefit of SIB under the theme of process was time saving while its challenges were problems associated with training and increased workload. In theme of outcome, the benefits of SIB included increased quality of services and rapid reporting of information while the possibility of violation of information confidentiality was the main challenge identified for SIB. Most of the identified benefits were related to the theme of outcome, and most of the identified challenges were associated with the theme of structure. In order to solve the identified SIB challenges, it is necessary to pay attention to the following points: using appropriate reward systems to increase people's motivation, comprehensive planning for step-by-step training of SIB users, correct budgeting based on conditions and facilities, using the experiences of other successful countries, and creating appropriate legal infrastructure to increase information security and confidentiality. The results of the present study can help countries that have not yet launched systems like SIB to take the necessary steps to build their own system with minimal challenges.

Availability of data and material

The datasets analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. World Health Organization (WHO). E-Health. Retrieved from:

  2. Berndt M, Fischer MR. The role of electronic health records in clinical reasoning. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1434(1):109–14. (Epub 2018 May 16 PMID: 29766520).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jafari H, Ranjbar M, AminiRarani M, Hashemi FS, Bidoki SS. Experiences and Views of Users about Delivering Services through the Integrated Health System: A qualitative study. TB. 2020;19(2):57–71 (

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shahmoradi L, Darrudi A, Shamsi F, Norouzinejad-Dastenayi A, Nasrolahbeigi F. Strategy Formulation of Electronic Health Record Implementation Using SWOT Analysis. Health Inf Manage. 2017;14(1):9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Setoodehzadeh F, Khammarnia M, Peyvand M. Health Integrated System in Iran: Opportunities and Constraints. J Health Sci Surveill Syst. 2021;9(3):206–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Safdari R, Masoori N, Seied Farajollah SS. Comparative Study Functions of Pioneer Organizations (ASTM, HL7 & ISO) in Developing Electronic Health Record. Health Inf Manag. 2011;8(3):422–32.

    Google Scholar 

  7. WHO Group Consultation on Health Telematics (1997: Geneva, Switzerland). (1998). A health telematics policy in support of WHO's Health-for-all strategy for global health development: report of the WHO Group Consultation on Health Telematics, 11–16 December, Geneva, 1997. World Health Organization.

  8. Nattagh F, Rezaei-Rad M. Role of e-health in Providing Health Services. Sci J Educ Dev Office Health School. 2012;11(42):23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tubaishat A. Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use of electronic health records among nurses: Application of Technology Acceptance Model. Inform Health Soc Care. 2018;43(4):379–89. (Epub 2017 Sep 18 PMID: 28920708).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fakhrzad M, Fakhrzad N, Dehghani M. The Role of Electronic Health Records in Presenting Health Information. Interdiscip J Virtual Learn Med Sci. 2012;2(4):31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldstein BA, Pencina M. J, Developing implementable risk prediction models with electronic health records data, Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. 2014. p. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee LM. Ethics and subsequent use of electronic health record data. J Biomed Inform. 2017;71:143–6. (Epub 2017 May 31 PMID: 28578074).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alpert JS. The electronic medical record in 2016: advantages and disadvantages. Digit Med. 2016;2:48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bani Issa W, Al Akour I, Ibrahim A, Almarzouqi A, Abbas S, Hisham F, Griffiths J. Privacy, confidentiality, security and patient safety concerns about electronic health records. Int Nurs Rev. 2020;67(2):218–30. (Epub 2020 Apr 21 PMID: 32314398).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fernández-Alemán JL, Señor IC, Lozoya PÁ, Toval A. Security and privacy in electronic health records: a systematic literature review. J Biomed Inform. 2013;46(3):541–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Els F, Cilliers L. A privacy management framework for personal electronic health records, African Journal of Science, Technology. Innov Dev. 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Waterson P, Hoonakker PL, Carayon P. Special issue on human factors and the implementation of health information technology (HIT): comparing approaches across nations. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(5):277–80. (Epub 2013 Jan 30 PMID: 23375708).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Salahuddin L, Ismail Z. Classification of antecedents towards safety use of health information technology: A systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2015;84(11):877–91. (Epub 2015 Jul 26 PMID: 26238706).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Secginli S, Erdogan S, Monsen KA. Attitudes of health professionals towards electronic health records in primary health care settings: a questionnaire survey. Inform Health Soc Care. 2014;39(1):15–32. (Epub 2013 Oct 16 PMID: 24131449).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kirshbaum M. Are we ready for the electronic patient record? Attitudes and perceptions of staff from two NHS trust hospitals. Health Informat J. 2004;10:265–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McAlearney AS, Robbins J, Hirsch A, Jorina M, Harrop JP. Perceived efficiency impacts following electronic health record implementation: An exploratory study of an urban community health center network. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(12):807–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Iqbal U, Ho CH, Li YC, Nguyen PA, Jian WS, Wen HC. The relationship between usage intention and adoption of electronic health records at primary care clinics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2013;112(3):731–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kabir MJ, AshrafianAmiri H, Rabiee SM, Keshavarzi A, Hosseini S, NasrollahpourShirvani SD. Satisfaction of Urban Family Physicians and Health Care Providers in Fars and Mazandaran Provinces from Integrated Health System. J Health Biomed Inform. 2018;4(4):244–52.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mohammadi Abnavi M, Saeed S. Evaluating the Performance of the Integrated Health System in the Quality of Health Care Delivery from the Viewpoint of Health Workers and Health Care Providers throughout Iran in 2020. J Health Biomed Inform. 2021;8(2):184–92.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bitaraf S, Janani L, Hajebi A, Motevalian SA. Information System Success of the Iranian Integrated Health Record System Based on the Clinical Information System Success Model. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022;36(1):198–205.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hazhir F, Jahanbakhsh M, Peikari H, Saghaeiannejad-Isfahani S. Investigating the Realization of the Consequences of Using the Integrated Health System (SIB) from Users’ Point of View in Primary Healthcare Centers in Isfahan. Iran hsr. 2020;16(2):136–42 (

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moradi Gh, Gholizade S, Rostami R, Moghbeli F. Evaluating the performance of the SIB system of health centers in Bojnourd and Neishabour from the perspective of users in 2020. Front Health Inform. 2022;11:100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Naghibzadeh GH, Safari Mohammadi F. Solutions for improving the health integrated system based on the experiences: A qualitative study,1 st congress of information technology and health promotion. promotion.Tehran. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  29. RangrazJeddi F, Nabovati E, Bigham R, Khajouei R. Usability evaluation of a comprehensive national health information system: relationship of quality components to users’ characteristics. Int J Med Inform. 2020;133:104026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Khammarnia M, Setoodehudezadeh F, Peyvand M, Setayesh AH, Rezaei K, KordTamini A, et al. Evaluation of Integrated Health System Technology Acceptance Among The users of Health Centers of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (ZAUMS): Iran. Evid Based Health Policy Manag Econ. 2019;3(3):154–61.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jahanbakhsh M, Peikari HR, Hazhir F, Saghaeiannejad-Isfahani S. An investigation into the effective factors on the acceptance and use of integrated health system in the primary health-care centers. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7:128. (Published 2018 Oct 29).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Cho JY, Lee EH. Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. Qual Rep. 2014;19(32):1-20.

  33. Hennink M, Kaiser B. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med. 2022;292:114523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage; 1994. (

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bitaraf E, Jafarpour M, Jami V, Sarani RF. The Iranian Integrated Care Electronic Health Record. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021;27(281):654–8. (PMID: 34042657).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ghayoom Zade MR, Rashidian E, Letafat NM. Identifying the challenges of implementing an integrated health system (SIB) and its implementation from the perspective of environmental and staff users of Tehran University of Medical Sciences one year after implementation (2017): A Qualitative study. Hakim Health Sys Res. 2020;23(1):46–62.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cho Y, Kim M, Choi M. Factors associated with nurses’ user resistance to change of electronic health record systems. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021;21:218.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Azizi AA, Hasibian MR, Tara M. Systematic review of the factors influencing the implementation and acceptance of electronic health records. J Med Counc Islam Rep Iran. 2014;31(4):289–97.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yoon D, Chang BC, Kang SW, Bae H, Park RW. Adoption of electronic health records in Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81(3):196–203. (Epub 2011 Dec 27 PMID: 22206619).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brumini G, Kovic I, Zombori D, Lulic I, Petrovecki M. Nurses’ attitudes towards computers: cross sectional questionnaire study. Croat Med J. 2005;46(1):101–4 (PMID: 15726683).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Castillo VH, Martínez-García AI, Pulido J. A knowledge-based taxonomy of critical factors for adopting electronic health record systems by physicians: a systematic literature review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010;10:60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Gagnon MP, Ouimet M, Godin G, Rousseau M, Labrecque M, Leduc Y, et al. Multilevel analysis of electronic health record adoption by health care professionals: a study protocol. Implementation sci. 2010;5:30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. McGinn CA, Grenier S, Duplantie J, Shaw N, Sicotte C, Mathieu L, et al. Comparison of user groups’ perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing electronic health records: a systematic review. BMC med. 2011;9:46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Menachemi N, Collum TH. Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2011;4:47–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Stream GR. Trends in adoption of electronic health records by family physicians in Washington State. Inform Prim Care. 2009;17(3):145–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Abolghasemi J, Maserat E, Kariminezhad R. Design and Psychometric Evaluation of User Satisfaction Questionnaire in Integrated Health System for Reliability and Validity. Depiction Health. 2021;12(2):187–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Tavakoli N, Jahanbakhsh M, Yadegarfard G, Ranjbar N. Acceptance and Use of Hospital Information System: A Study on Medical Records Users Based on Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. J Health Biomed Inform. 2017;3(4):243–50.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nassiripour A, Radfr R, Najaf Beygi R, Rahmani H. Evaluating the Effective Factors on Establishing an Electronic Health System in Iran. J Hospital. 2011;10(1):53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Howard J, Clark EC, Friedman A, Crosson JC, Pellerano M, Crabtree BF, et al. Electronic health record impact on work burden in small, una_liated, community-based primary care practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28:107–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Laitinen H, Kaunonen M, Astedt-Kurki P. The impact of using electronic patient records on practices of reading and writing. Health Inform J. 2014;20:235–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Shachak A, Hadas-Dayagi M, Ziv A, Reis S. Primary care physicians’ use of an electronic medical record system: a cognitive task analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(3):341–8. (Epub 2009 Jan 7).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Steininger K, Stiglbauer B, Baumgartner B, Engleder B. “Factors Explaining Physicians’ Acceptance of Electronic Health Records,” 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 2014. p. 2768–77.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  53. Columbus ML. The Evaluation and Effectiveness Of An Interdisciplinary Coures In Electronic Health Record (EHR) Technology For Health And Rehabilitation Professionals. Pittsburgh: Master of Science University of Pittsburgh; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Jabraeily M, Ahmadi M, Pirnejad H, Niazkhani Z, Salarei S, Sadegian A. Factors affecting hospital information system implementation. J Qazvin Univ Med Sci. 2013;3(68):28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rathert C, Porter TH, Mittler JN, Fleig-Palmer M. Seven years after Meaningful Use: Physicians’ and nurses’ experiences with electronic health records. Health Care Manag Rev. 2019;44:30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Tsai CH, Eghdam A, Davoody N, Wright G, Flowerday S, Koch S. Effects of Electronic Health Record Implementation and Barriers to Adoption and Use: A Scoping Review and Qualitative Analysis of the Content. Life (Basel). 2020;10(12):327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Miller RH, Sim I. Physicians’ use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23(2):116–26. (PMID: 15046136).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Shield RR, Goldman RE, Anthony DA, Wang N, Doyle RJ, Borkan J. Gradual electronic health record implementation: new insights on physician and patient adaptation. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(4):316–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Jebraeily M, Ahmadi M, Hajavi A, Gohari M, SedghiJahromi M, Zareh Z. Electronic Health Records: Personnel Readiness Assessment. JHA. 2010;13(39):17–24 (

    Google Scholar 

  60. Poorshahrokhi N, Dastyar N, Shahriyari M. Evaluation of prenatal care reminder system based on SMS service of Sib system. 2019. Women's Reproductive Health Research Student Congress. Jiroft. COI: SRHC01_013.

  61. Wass S, Vimarlund V. Same, same but different: Perceptions of patients’ online access to electronic health records among healthcare professionals. Health Inform J. 2019;25(4):1538–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Zanaboni P, Kummervold PE, Sørensen T, Johansen MA. Patient Use and Experience With Online Access to Electronic Health Records in Norway: Results From an Online Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(2):e16144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Eberts M, Capurro D. Patient and Physician Perceptions of the Impact of Electronic Health Records on the Patient-Physician Relationship. Appl Clin Inform. 2019;10(4):729–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Moody LE, Slocumb E, Berg B, Jackson D. Electronic health records documentation in nursing: nurses’ perceptions, attitudes, and preferences. Comput Inform Nurs. 2004;22(6):337–44. (PMID: 15602303).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Gordon BD, Bernard K, Salzman J, Whitebird RR. Impact of Health Information Exchange on Emergency Medicine Clinical Decision Making. West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(7):1047–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Mathai N, McGill T, Toohey D. Factors Influencing Consumer Adoption of Electronic Health Records. J Comput Inf Syst. 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Keshta, Odeh A. Security and privacy of electronic health records: Concerns and challenges. Egypt Inform J. 2021;22:177–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Farzandipour M, Sadoughi F, Ahmadi M, Karimi I. Security requirements and solutions in electronic health records: lessons learned from a comparative study. J Med Syst. 2010;34:629–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Gharaee H. The Impact of Public-Private Partnership Implementation on Quality of Recorded Information and Staff Satisfaction with Integrated Health System in Comprehensive Urban Health Centers. Proceeding of the 1th congress on Information Technology and Health Promotion; 2018; Tehran, Information Technology and Health Promotion Association. 2018:

Download references


We would like acknowledge all who cooperated with us at different stages of data collection and official process of the present study.


This study was funded by Students Research Committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran (Grant No.: 99s75).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



F.F and S.Gh contributed to the conception and design of the study. A.A and B.D did the data collection. All authors contributed to the data analysis and writing of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farzad Faraji-Khiavi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the research ethics committee of Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences (Ref. ID: IR.AJUMS.REC.1399.783). Also, prior to commencement of the study, informed consent was obtained from the participants. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalkhajeh, S.G., Aghajari, A., Dindamal, B. et al. The Integrated Electronic Health System in Iranian health centers: benefits and challenges. BMC Prim. Care 24, 53 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: