Skip to main content
Download PDF

Factors associated with the status of usual source of care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide survey in Japan

BMC Primary Care volume 24, Article number: 193 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

To ensure that high-quality primary care is available to every individual, increasing the proportion of residents with a usual source of care (USC) is a challenge for each country. However, the status of USC after the spread of COVID-19 and the factors associated with it remain unclear internationally. Therefore, we aimed to explore the associations of sociodemographic and clinical factors with the presence and type of USC (kakaritsukei in Japanese) during the pandemic in Japan.

Methods

We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of the general Japanese adult population in May 2021. The main outcome measures were the presence and type of USC. We assessed sociodemographic and clinical factors, including age, gender, marital status, years of education, employment status, annual household income, social isolation, health literacy, number of chronic conditions, and health-related quality of life.

Results

Of the 1,757 participants, 1,011 (57.5%) had a USC. There were 769 (76.1%) participants who had a USC in a clinic and 227 (22.5%) in a hospital. As a result of multivariable modified Poisson regression analysis, male gender, no chronic condition, lower health literacy, and social isolation were significantly associated with not having a USC. Among participants with a USC, male gender, the presence of one or more chronic conditions, and lower health-related quality of life were associated with having a hospital-based USC.

Conclusions

We identified factors associated with the status of USC during the COVID-19 pandemic, including health literacy and social isolation. These findings provide primary care providers and policymakers with insight into the potential barriers to having a USC in the aftermath of the pandemic.

Peer Review reports

Background

A usual source of care (USC) is a person or place that people can turn to with a health issue or concern and is generally considered primary care [1]. There is a wealth of evidence regarding the benefits of having a USC. For example, having a USC has been associated with improved receipt of preventive services, [2] better control of chronic diseases, [3] more patient-centered communication, [4] and lower health care costs [5]. Furthermore, even during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic when there were many barriers to providing usual medical care, the presence of USC was associated with increased preventive care utilization and decreased total hospitalization [6, 7].

To ensure that high-quality primary care is available to every individual, increasing the proportion of residents with a USC is a challenge for each country. In the United States, the Primary Care Collaborative Evidence Report showed that the percentage of Americans with a USC has been declining, falling 10% between 2000 and 2019, from 84 to 74%. In 2020, there was a slight uptick in USC to 75%.1 In Japan, the proportion of adult residents with USC, called kakaritsukei in Japanese, was about 55% in 2017 and 2020, [8] which is lower than in the United States, even though the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare has recommended that everyone should have a USC.

In Japan, the pandemic has highlighted issues related to primary care, including ambiguity about the role of USC. For example, a previous study found that approximately one-fifth of Japanese adult residents who had a USC reported limited access to primary care for COVID-19 consultation due to their USC’s refusal during the pandemic [9]. The Japanese government recognized the need to clarify and strengthen the role of primary care physicians and decided to legislate the function of the kakaritsukei in 2022 [10]. Further dissemination of USC and its contribution is required in Japan, but in order to do so, it is important to clarify the factors associated with the status of USC after the COVID-19 expansion.

In studies in other countries such as the United States and Korea before the COVID-19 pandemic, several sociodemographic and clinical factors have been identified as being associated with the presence of USC [11,12,13]. These include age, gender, marital status, region, education, race, income, insurance, and chronic conditions. Similarly, a survey conducted by the Japan Medical Association Research Institute reported that older adults and women were more likely to have a USC [8]. However, the status of USC after the spread of COVID-19 and the factors associated with it remain unclear internationally. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to explore the associations of sociodemographic and clinical factors with the presence and type of USC during the pandemic in Japan. We were particularly interested in the factors of health literacy and social isolation, which are major health issues worldwide as a result of the pandemic [14, 15]. Clarifying them will be useful for improving primary care system after the pandemic.

Methods

Design, setting, and participants

We used the data from the baseline survey of the National Usual source of Care Survey (NUCS). The NUCS was a nationwide mail survey collecting USC, health care utilization, health status, and sociodemographic data from a representative sample of Japanese adults. The baseline survey was conducted in May 2021. Details of the NUCS, including sampling methods, have been reported previously [16]. In summary, 2,000 potential participants between the ages of 20 and 75 were selected from a nationally representative panel using stratified random sampling. The sample size was consistent with the needs of other studies that are part of the NUCS. Participants in the survey were given JPY 500 gift certificates.

Measures

Usual source of care

In Japan, physicians who have completed their training in internal medicine and then work in clinics or small and medium-sized hospitals with fewer than 200 beds often serve as USCs [8, 17]. In addition to them, the Japan Primary Care Association has been certifying family physicians since 2010, and the Japanese Medical Specialty Board launched a new certification program for primary care specialists in 2018, but the number of these specialists is still small.

To determine an individual’s USC, the following item was used in the Japanese version of Primary Care Assessment Tool [18, 19] and nationwide surveys, such as the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: “Is there a doctor that you usually go to if you are sick or need advice about your health?”. Participants’ responses were on a binary scale (yes vs. no). If participants answered yes to the primary question, they were asked to answer the following item on the type of their USC: “Where does the doctor work?” Participants were asked to answer clinic, hospital, university hospital, or other. A participant was considered to have a USC if he or she was able to identify a physician practicing outside of university hospitals. This is because the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan separates the roles of kakaritsukei, which provide primary care, and university hospitals.

Sociodemographic and clinical factors

We collected data on the sociodemographic and clinical factors of the participants. The structured questionnaire measured the age, gender, marital status, years of education, employment status, annual household income, social isolation assessed by the Japanese version of the abbreviated Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6), [20] health literacy assessed by the Communicative and Critical Health Literacy (CCHL), [21] number of chronic conditions, and health-related quality of life assessed by the five-level version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5 L) [22].

The LSNS-6 is a 6-item self-reported scale used to assess social isolation by measuring perceived social support received from family and friends. This tool assesses the size, closeness, and frequency of contacts in a respondent’s social network. The scores range from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores indicating a better quality of social network. We classified participants with an LSNS-6 score < 12 points as socially isolated, as suggested in the previous study [23].

The CCHL consists of five items and the scores range from 1 to 5 points, with higher scores indicating higher health literacy. The CCHL items were constructed to directly reflect the World Health Organization’s definitions of communicative and critical health literacy [21].

The EQ-5D-5 L is a generic instrument for describing and valuing health. It is based on a descriptive system that defines health in terms of 5 dimensions: Mobility, Self- Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life [22].

We used a validated list of 20 chronic conditions that was developed based on previous literature on multimorbidity and its relevance to the primary care population [24]: hypertension, depression/anxiety, chronic musculoskeletal conditions that cause pain or limitation, arthritis/rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, chronic respiratory disease (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or chronic bronchitis), cardiovascular disease, heart failure, stroke/transient ischemic attack, stomach problems, colon problems, chronic hepatitis, diabetes, thyroid disorder, any cancer in the past 5 years, kidney disease/failure, chronic urinary problem, dementia/Alzheimer’s disease, hyperlipidemia, and obesity.

Statistical analysis

We calculated the descriptive statistics for individual sociodemographic and clinical factors by USC status. Multivariable modified Poisson regression analysis with robust error variance was conducted to determine the associations of sociodemographic and clinical factors with the presence of USC during the pandemic. We also performed an additional modified Poisson regression analysis to explore the associations of sociodemographic and clinical factors with the type of USC (clinic-based or hospital-based) among participants who had a USC. In the analysis, we excluded the small number of participants whose USC worked in settings other than clinics and hospitals.

For each analysis, we used a two-sided significance level of P = 0.05. We performed complete case analyses for missing independent variables in the regression models because the missing data were low (0–4.0%). Statistical analyses were conducted using R, version 4.2.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; www.R-project.org).

Results

Participant characteristics

Of the 2,000 adult residents, 1,757 completed the NUCS baseline survey (response rate: 87.9%). Of the participants, 1,011 (57.5%) had a USC. There were 769 (76.1%) participants who had a USC in a clinic, 227 (22.5%) in a hospital, and 15 (1.5%) in other settings or were missing. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the study population by USC status. Compared with participants without a USC, those with a USC were older (≥ 70 years, 15.4% vs. 5.1%), more often female (53.9% vs. 47.3%), more often unemployed (29.7% vs. 20.2%), less often socially isolated (26.6% vs. 35.7%), and had more chronic conditions (with ≥ 2 chronic conditions, 34.5% vs. 11.9%).

Table 1 Participants’ characteristics with or without usual source of care
Full size table

Factors associated with the presence of USC

Figure 1 shows the result of multivariable modified Poisson regression analysis, exploring the associations of sociodemographic and clinical factors with the presence of USC during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 1,621 subjects were included in the multivariable analysis. Gender, social isolation, CCHL score, and the number of chronic conditions were significantly associated with the presence of USC. Adjusted prevalence ratios of having a USC were 1.12 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02–1.23) for being female (vs. male), 0.84 (95%CI: 0.77–0.93) for being socially isolated (vs. not socially isolated), 1.05 (95%CI: 1.01–1.10) per 1SD increase in CCHL score, and 1.51 (95%CI: 1.35–1.69) for the presence (vs. absence) of a chronic condition.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Factors associated with the presence of a usual source of care (n = 1,621). Abbreviations: CCHL, Communicative and Critical Health Literacy; EQ-5D-5 L, five-level version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire. CCHL and EQ-5D-5 L: prevalence ratio per 1SD increase in score

Full size image

Factors associated with the type of USC

Table 2 shows the result of multivariable modified Poisson regression analysis, exploring the associations of sociodemographic and clinical factors with the type of USC (clinic-based or hospital-based). A total of 916 subjects with USC and no missing independent variables were included in the multivariable analysis. As a result, male gender, the presence of one or more chronic conditions, and lower EQ-5D-5 L scores were associated with having a hospital-based USC.

Table 2 Factors associated with having a hospital-based usual source of care (n = 916)
Full size table

Discussion

The nationwide study of the Japanese adult population revealed that sociodemographic and clinical factors were differentially associated with the status of USC even during the COVID-19 pandemic. To increase Japanese adults who have a USC, an approach that targets residents who are male, without chronic conditions, with lower health literacy, and with social isolation may be warranted. In addition, our study also found that factors such as gender, the presence of chronic conditions, and health-related quality of life were associated with the type of USC. This study provided additional insight into USC because of changes in the social environment and health care utilization internationally after the COVID-19 expansion.

The proportion of adult residents with USC in this study was similar to that in a recent survey conducted by the Japan Medical Association Research Institute and did not increase after the expansion of COVID-19 [25]. Despite the increased importance of primary care due to the COVID-19 pandemic, more than 40% of adults still did not have a USC. Japan’s long-standing system of free access to specialists may be one of the barriers to the continuity of care and the spread of USC. Japanese policymakers need to take fundamental steps to strengthen the primary care system after the pandemic.

Our findings were consistent with previous studies conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic, which showed that adults with a USC were more likely to be female and to have chronic conditions [11,12,13]. Our results showed that older residents were more likely to have a USC, but the difference was not statistically significant after adjusting for other factors. Prior studies in the United States have reported that residents with longer educational years and higher income were also more likely to have a USC, but no similar association was found in Japan, which has a universal health insurance system that provides comprehensive coverage to all Japanese citizens [26].

Although the association between health literacy and the presence of USC had been poorly studied and unclear, [27] in our study, the association was statistically significant in the multivariable analysis. Lower health literacy may be a barrier to having USC, as well as other positive health behaviors. In addition, the present study also reported the association between social isolation, which is a major health problem and has increased worldwide due to the pandemic, and the presence of USC. The primary care utilization of socially isolated people remains unclear worldwide. A previous study conducted in Canada before the pandemic suggested an association between social capital and having a regular family doctor; however, the study used a measure of social capital that has not been examined for reliability and validity [28]. Our findings regarding USC provide additional information about potential mechanisms by which social isolation influences health outcomes. Although the Japanese government plans to disseminate USC by providing residents with information on the functions of each kakaritsukei through its website and other sources, there will be a need to reach out to vulnerable populations who are socially isolated or have low levels of health literacy and need primary care supports.

Our study also showed that adults with a chronic condition or poorer health status are more likely to have a hospital-based USC. These results can be attributed to Japan’s free access system and the fact that hospitals have more medical equipment than clinics and provide inpatient care in addition to outpatient care. The previous study in the United States did not report similar results regarding differences in patient characteristics between clinic-based and hospital-based USC [29]. Our results may be useful in considering the shared roles and coordination between clinics and small and medium-sized hospitals in Japan, where primary care is provided in a variety of settings.

A key strength of our study is the use of data from a nationwide study, with a sample representative of the Japanese adult population, which allows for the generalization of its results to the wider population. Another strength of this study is the high response rate. However, the present study has several potential limitations. First, in this study, we defined a USC as a specific doctor and collected the information by using a structured questionnaire. In other countries, a USC may be considered a specific person or a specific place, but in Japan, it currently refers to a specific doctor according to the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Therefore, caution should be exercised when comparing our findings with those of other countries. Second, we used a validated list of chronic conditions; however, self-reported data for identifying chronic conditions may have introduced misclassification bias.　Third, it is difficult to compare the results of the present study with pre-pandemic results because no previous nationwide study that comprehensively investigated the factors associated with the status of USC exists in Japan. Fourth, given the cross-sectional nature of the data, causal relationships of the identified factors with the presence and type of USC cannot be definitively established. Fifth, although we used a national panel based on a multistage sampling method, caution should be exercised in generalizing the results of this study due to the nature of panel surveys.

Conclusions

We identified factors associated with the status of USC during the COVID-19 pandemic, including health literacy and social isolation. These findings provide primary care providers and policymakers with insight into the potential barriers to having a USC in the aftermath of the pandemic.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and analyzed in the current study are not publicly available because we did not obtain informed consent from the participants to share the data. However, the datasets are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

USC:

Usual source of care

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

NUCS:

National Usual source of Care Survey

LSNS-6:

Lubben Social Network Scale

CCHL:

Communicative and Critical Health Literacy

EQ-5D-5 L:

Five-level version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire

References

  1. Primary Care Collaborative. Relationships Matter: How Usual is Usual Source of (Primary) Care? Published 2022. Accessed February 8., 2023. https://www.pcpcc.org/sites/default/files/resources/pcc-evidence-report-2022_1.pdf.

  2. Kim MY, Kim JH, Choi IK, Hwang IH, Kim SY. Effects of having usual source of care on preventive services and chronic disease control: a systematic review. Korean J Fam Med. 2012;33(6):336–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dinkler JM, Sugar CA, Escarce JJ, Ong MK, Mangione CM. Does Age Matter? Association between Usual source of Care and Hypertension Control in the US Population: Data from NHANES 2007–2012. Am J Hypertens. 2016;29(8):934–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Finney Rutten LJ, Agunwamba AA, Beckjord E, Hesse BW, Moser RP, Arora NK. The relation between having a Usual source of care and ratings of Care Quality: does patient-centered communication play a role? J Health Commun. 2015;20(7):759–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Phillips RL, Dodoo MS, Green LA, et al. Usual source of care: an important source of variation in health care spending. Health Aff. 2009;28(2):567–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aoki T, Fujinuma Y, Matsushima M. Usual source of primary care and preventive care measures in the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan. BMJ Open. 2022;12(3):e057418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aoki T, Sugiyama Y, Mutai R, Matsushima M. Impact of Primary Care attributes on hospitalization during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide prospective cohort study in Japan. Ann Fam Med. 2023;21(1):27–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Japan Medical Association Research Institute. 6th Survey of Attitudes Toward Japanese Healthcare. Published September 23, 2020. Accessed February 8., 2023. https://www.jmari.med.or.jp/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/WP448.pdf.

  9. Aoki T, Fujinuma Y, Matsushima M. Patient experience of residents with restricted primary care access during the COVID-19 pandemic. Fam Med Community Health. 2022;10(2). https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2022-001667.

  10. The Japan Times. Japan panel seeks clarification of primary care system after COVID issues. Published November 28, 2022. Accessed February 8., 2023. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2022/11/28/national/primary-care-doctors-proposal-panel/.

  11. An AR, Kim K, Lee JH, Sung NJ, Lee SI, Hyun MK. Having a usual source of care and its associated factors in korean adults: a cross-sectional study of the 2012 Korea Health Panel Survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17(1):167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nothelle SK, Boyd C, Sheehan O, Wolff JL. Factors Associated with loss of Usual source of Care among older adults. Ann Fam Med. 2018;16(6):538–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee DC, Shi L, Wang J, Sun G. Usual source of care and access to care in the US: 2005 vs. 2015. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(1):e0278015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu B. Social isolation and loneliness among older adults in the context of COVID-19: a global challenge. Glob Health Res Policy. 2020;5:27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Okan O, Messer M, Levin-Zamir D, Paakkari L, Sørensen K. Health literacy as a social vaccine in the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Promot Int Published Online January. 2022;12. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab197.

  16. Aoki T, Matsushima M. The Ecology of Medical Care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: a Nationwide Survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(5):1211–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Aoki T, Yamamoto Y, Fukuhara S. Comparison of primary care experience in Hospital-Based Practices and Community-Based Office Practices in Japan. Ann Fam Med. 2020;18(1):24–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Shi L, Starfield B, Xu J. Validating the Adult Primary Care Assessment Tool. J Fam Pract. 2001;50(2):161–75.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Aoki T, Fukuhara S, Yamamoto Y. Development and validation of a concise scale for assessing patient experience of primary care for adults in Japan. Fam Pract. 2020;37(1):137–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurimoto A, Awata S, Ohkubo T, Tsubota-Utsugi M, Asayama K, Takahashi K, Suenaga K, Satoh H, Imai Y. Reliability and validity of the japanese version of the abbreviated Lubben Social Network Scale. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2011;48(2):149–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ishikawa H, Nomura K, Sato M, Yano E. Developing a measure of communicative and critical health literacy: a pilot study of japanese office workers. Health Promot Int. 2008;23(3):269–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lubben J, Blozik E, Gillmann G, et al. Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three european community-dwelling older adult populations. Gerontologist. 2006;46(4):503–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fortin M, Almirall J, Nicholson K. Development of a research tool to document self-reported chronic conditions in primary care. J Comorb. 2017;7(1):117–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Japan Medical Association Research Institute. 7th Survey of Attitudes Toward Japanese Healthcare. Published June 8, 2022. Accessed February 8., 2023. https://www.jmari.med.or.jp/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/WP466_1.pdf.

  26. Sakamoto H, Rahman M, Nomura S et al. Japan health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2018;8(1). https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259941.

  27. Levy H, Janke A. Health literacy and Access to Care. J Health Commun. 2016;21(Suppl 1):43–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bataineh H, Devlin RA, Barham V. Social capital and having a regular family doctor: evidence from longitudinal data. Soc Sci Med. 2019;220:421–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mafi JN, Wee CC, Davis RB, Landon BE. Association of Primary Care Practice Location and Ownership with the Provision of Low-Value Care in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(6):838–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP20K18849. The funder had no role in the design of the study; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; and writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Research Center for Medical Sciences, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-28-5, Nishishimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan

    Takuya Aoki & Masato Matsushima

  2. Section of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Syogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan

    Takuya Aoki

Authors
  1. Takuya Aoki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masato Matsushima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TA designed the study; analyzed and interpreted the data; and prepared and reviewed the manuscript. MM designed the study, interpreted the data, and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takuya Aoki.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

TA and MM received lecture fees and lecture travel fees from the Centre for Family Medicine Development of Japanese Health and Welfare Co-operative Federation. TA and MM are advisers of the Centre for Family Medicine Development practice-based research network. MM’s son-in-law is a past employee of IQVIA Services Japan K.K., a contract research organization and a contract sales organization, and a current employee of Syneos Health Clinical K.K., a contract research organization and a contract sales organization.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We conducted this study in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Biological Research Involving Human Subjects. The institutional review board of the Jikei University School of Medicine approved this study (approval number 32–416[10505]). Written informed consent was obtained from every participant.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aoki, T., Matsushima, M. Factors associated with the status of usual source of care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide survey in Japan. BMC Prim. Care 24, 193 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02148-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-023-02148-9

Keywords

BMC Primary Care

ISSN: 2731-4553

Contact us