Skip to main content
Download PDF

Addressing health challenges in rural Japan: a thematic analysis of social isolation and community solutions

BMC Primary Care volume 25, Article number: 26 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The establishment of sustainable connections between medical professionals and rural citizens is pivotal for effective community healthcare. Our study focuses on understanding and resolving health problems arising from social isolation, a critical barrier to achieving this goal, especially in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) pandemic's impact on community dynamics respecting social cognitive theory. This study investigates the link between social isolation and rural community healthcare. We aim to develop methods that improve interaction and collaboration between healthcare providers and rural communities, ultimately enhancing the region's healthcare system.

Methods

Employing thematic analysis based on social cognitive theory, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 57 community workers in rural communities. This qualitative approach enabled us to delve into the nuances of social isolation and its multifaceted impact on health and community well-being.

Results

Our analysis revealed four key themes: the impact of aging on social dynamics, shifts in community relationships, unique aspects of rural community networking, and the role of these networks in driving community health. Notably, we identified specific challenges, such as the erosion of intergenerational interactions and the hesitancy to seek support, exacerbated by social isolation and negatively impacting community health.

Conclusions

Our study reveals the complex factors affecting rural community sustainability, particularly social isolation influenced by privacy concerns and changing social dynamics. Emphasizing the importance of social cognitive theory, it highlights the need for adaptable healthcare systems and strong community-medical collaborations. Future research should focus on developing culturally sensitive, practical strategies for enhancing these collaborations, especially involving physicians, to address rural communities' unique challenges.

Peer Review reports

Background

The establishment of a trustworthy relationship between medical institutions and rural communities is crucial for effective community care. This relationship has been particularly challenged in recent times, evidenced by declining engagement and trust between rural citizens and healthcare providers [1, 2]. Studies have shown a noticeable decrease in interaction and collaboration in these areas, further compounded by the challenges of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic [3, 4].

To manage people’s health effectively, it is essential to support medical institutions in providing appropriate medical care [1, 2]. The trust that people place in medical institutions is a cornerstone of their smooth functioning [3, 4]. Cooperation between community members and medical institutions is pivotal for appropriate health management, impacting the community’s overall health [5, 6]. This cooperation becomes even more vital in rural settings, where healthcare resources are often limited.

Health dialogues between medical professionals and community members can significantly improve the relationship between citizens and medical professionals. Such dialogues help clarify community needs and expectations from medical institutions, which, when addressed, increase trust and reliance on these institutions [7,8,9]. Moreover, making medical institutions aware of their limitations through dialogue encourages people to manage their health independently [10, 11]. Creating human connections through dialogue is essential in increasing people’s affinity for medical institutions and recognizing their necessity in community health.

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted these essential dialogues, leading to a loss of opportunities to improve community care quality. As the world transitions towards living with the virus, it becomes imperative for community hospitals to increase opportunities for dialogue with community members to enhance medical safety and assurance [12,13,14]. A lack of such dialogue may contribute to social isolation in communities [15,16,17], which can lead to various health problems, including ineffective health-seeking behaviors and delayed use of medical resources [18, 19].

In rural communities, where healthcare resources are scarce and practical healthcare usage is crucial, social isolation can have particularly severe consequences [20, 21]. Inadequate healthcare use can significantly affect health, with the impact of social isolation varying by region [22, 23]. Post-COVID-19, an investigation into the social conditions of rural communities is necessary to address these issues [24, 25]. Furthermore, social cognitive theory can be applicable to rural health promotion based on personal and community activities [26]. Social cognitive theory can investigate personal, behavioral, and environmental factors in relation to personal and community activities. By understanding and tackling the health problems caused by social isolation through the framework of social cognitive theory, we can establish effective ways to approach and resolve community social isolation. This study investigates the link between social isolation and rural community healthcare. We aim to develop methods that improve interaction and collaboration between healthcare providers and rural communities, ultimately enhancing the region's healthcare system.

Methods

This qualitative study used thematic analysis of participants in rural communities to investigate the health problems caused by social isolation and their solutions.

Setting

This study was conducted in Unnan City, Shimane Prefecture, Japan. Unnan City is in the eastern part of Shimane and borders Hiroshima Prefecture to the south. Its total land area is 553.1 km2 and accounts for 8.3% of Shimane, most of which is covered with forests. A survey conducted in 2020 revealed that the total population of Unnan City was 36,007 (17,316 men and 18,691 women), with 40.01% of the population being older than 65 years. Unnan City has six towns (Daito, Kamo, Kisuki, Mitoya, Yoshida, and Kakeya), and each town has multifunctional autonomy and various functions in social issue management. Furthermore, 30 communities have multifunctional autonomies. In traditional protocols, multiple community groups have specific functions (e.g., community organizing, healthcare, and continual education). Thus, each autonomous community organization comprises directors, sub-directors, and clerks active in three main categories: community organizing, healthcare, and social/environmental development. Community organizing refers to citizen empowerment, effective utilization of local resources, and solving community problems through the efforts of local administrative bodies [27].

Participants

Community workers were recruited through purposive sampling from April 2022 to March 2023. We focused on individuals actively engaged in community organizing, healthcare, and social/environmental development across Unnan City's six towns. Participants included were community workers directly involved in one of the three main categories and residing in the target towns. Those not actively engaged in community work or living outside these areas were excluded. Fifty-seven community workers participated, with 2 to 5 individuals representing each town. The participants were briefed about the study and provided informed consent to participate. The participants wore face masks, and a distance of > 2 m was maintained between them.

Data collection

Semi-structured interviews were conducted in Japanese at each town’s community center in a private, comfortable setting. Each interview was performed face to face. The first researcher, with expertise in family medicine and public health, established rapport with participants before each interview and followed a semi-structured guide for in-depth discussions. The interview guide, developed through the discussion with the research team, included four questions: What health problems does your town face from social isolation? How does your town address community issues? How does your town manage the social isolation in the community? Do you have any ideas for improving health problems caused by social isolation? (Appendix 1) The interviewees were facilitated to discuss the interview guide as both community workers and rural citizens. Each interview lasted approximately 60 min and was recorded and transcribed verbatim.

Reflexivity

This study was performed through interactions between researchers and participants collaboratively. The research team had diverse expertise and perspectives related to rural community care. A family physician and public health professional (RO) graduated with a master's degree in public health and family medicine and had experience in working and research in rural community health. A director of a non-profit organization (TY) worked in rural communities and has been charged with supporting isolated people in communities for 20 years. A medical educator and professor at a medical university (CS), graduated from a medical university and specialized in community health care management and education. To prevent bias, we discussed each idea about community care in analyzing the research contents of individual data analyses. We explored alternative viewpoints during the process of interpreting the data.

Analysis

Our analysis employed inductive thematic analysis, guided by social cognitive theory, to explore health problems caused by social isolation in rural contexts and identify potential solutions. This framework, emphasizing personal, behavioral, and environmental factors related to community activities, provides a structured approach to understanding complex social phenomena, which is crucial for our study [26, 28]. Following the principles of social cognitive theory, all interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. This approach ensured that our data remained true to the participants' perspectives, a fundamental tenet of personal, behavioral, and environmental factors related to community activities. Initially, RO and TY carefully read the interview transcripts individually after interviewing three participants. Subsequently, the two researchers independently coded the transcripts and discussed the coding comprehensively until a mutual agreement was reached. In alignment with social cognitive theory, RO undertook a meticulous coding process, developing and revising codebooks through repeated readings of the transcripts. This iterative process is consistent with the thematic analysis framework, ensuring that our coding captures the depth and complexity of the data [26, 28]. TY independently read the content of the transcripts. After coding each participant’s data, RO and TY discussed the coding based on the codebooks until a mutual agreement was reached. The two authors introduced, merged, deleted, and refined codes, which enabled them to develop concepts and overarching themes by comparing the research materials and codes. Discussions regarding the data and coding continued until a mutual agreement was reached, and no new concepts or themes were developed. To validate our findings within the context of social cognitive theory, CS, a community care specialist, participated in discussions regarding the coding, concepts, and themes. This expert validation ensured that our interpretations were consistent with the framework and resonated with professional insights in the field. In translating the results from Japanese to English, we were careful to preserve the nuances essential to social cognitive theory, ensuring that the translation process did not compromise the integrity of our thematic analysis.

Trustworthiness

We established credibility through prolonged engagement and iterative discussions with participants. Regular peer debriefing sessions among the research team were conducted to cross-validate findings and interpretations. Detailed descriptions of the research context, participant demographics, and the methodology are provided to allow for the assessment of transferability to other rural settings. An audit trail detailing the research process, from data collection to analysis, was maintained. This approach minimized potential researcher bias, ensuring that findings reflect the participants' experiences. The study's dependability was ensured through a consistent and transparent methodological approach. Ongoing discussions within the research team provided a reflexive critique of the process, enhancing the study's reliability.

Ethical consideration

Participant anonymity and confidentiality were ensured throughout the study. All participants provided written informed consent before participating and answering the questionnaires. All procedures complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. The Unnan City Hospital Clinical Ethics Committee approved the study protocol (No. 20220002).

Results

Results of the thematic analysis

The average age of the participants was 65.4 years (Standard deviation = 10.2), and the proportion of female participants was 49.1% (28/57). As community workers, all participants were engaged in community activities for health and the environment. Through thematic analysis, four themes were identified: social changes due to aging, relational changes in communities, community-specific networking, and connections driving community health (Table 1).

Table 1 Results of the thematic analysis
Full size table

Social changes due to aging that cause social isolation include the dilution of human relationships, lack of diverse generations, and distance to medical care facilities. Relational changes in communities were explained by excessive consideration of privacy, lack of intimacy with one's surroundings, and hesitance to depend on others. Rural communities have specific networking strategies, such as the involvement of well-known people in communities, localization of community information, and specific lay care in communities. For the sustainability of rural healthcare, solving social isolation issues through connections driving community health, including respect for community culture, smooth collaboration with healthcare providers, and active engagement of physicians, were demanded.

Social change due to aging

In rural communities, aging deterred mobility among older people. Their limited mobility hindered them from actively engaging and interacting within the communities. One participant stated, “Aging causes us to move less due to losing our driving license and few public transportation systems.” (Participant 5, 77-year-old man) Less interaction among older people was also caused by dispersed living conditions in rural areas, which diluted human relationships. One of the participants stated, “Once, I could go to other community people’s homes to talk about trivial things about our lives. Such behavior helped establish human relationships in communities. However, the lack of transportation and disparate living may inhibit us from meeting each other frequently. We may thus be reluctant to help each other." (Participant 3, 72-year-old woman) Aging and low mobility in rural areas have rendered these relationships unreliable.

The outflow of younger generations to urban areas reduced the interaction between the younger and older generations, impacting community diversity. The lack of workplaces and the need to migrate for education reduced the number of younger generations in rural communities. One participant stated, "Rural communities do not have many places to work and receive an education. Therefore, many younger generations cannot help but leave." (Participant 8, a 67-year-old man) The change in the balance between the younger and older generations has resulted in a loss of diversity in rural communities. The reality in rural contexts is the loss of mutual help between generations, which impinged older people's medical care. One of the participants stated, "Previously, younger generations supported older generations in their usual lives and visits to medical institutions. However, having fewer young people in rural areas may inhibit older people from attending medical institutions, even when they have symptoms.” (Participant 1, a 78-year-old woman) Moreover, social structural changes in rural communities have reduced the support for older people and increased the distance to medical care facilities.

Relational changes in communities

Besides social changes associated with aging, excessive consideration of privacy has changed people's relationships in rural communities. Rural people were anxious about privacy problems; therefore, they could not communicate with people in the same community about their lives, compared with the past. One of the participants stated, "These days, dialogues about personal things might decrease. I am uncertain, but this could be affected by recent privacy issues. Many older adults may adopt excessive privacy and become reluctant to discuss personal and social issues." (Participant 11, 70-year-old woman) Rural communities have lost the opportunity to share their problems effectively.

Reduced dialogue among rural people decreased their intimacy with their surroundings. Rural residents became less aware of community issues and focused more on their issues. Eventually, they lacked interest in other community residents. One participant stated, "Recently, people in rural communities may lose interest in others because of reduced interaction. The lack of interest in others can cause various mental and health issues, especially among older people. They may lose the opportunity to receive help from others." (Participant 6, 80-year-old man) Furthermore, the reduction in mutual help in rural communities induced people's hesitance to depend on others, which is peculiar to rural communities. One participant stated, "Rural communities covered the lack of resources with mutual help. However, human relationships in communities have changed, and few people actively help each other. Therefore, they may find it difficult to obtain help." (Participant 7, 69-year-old woman).

Community-specific networking

Rural communities have different information-sharing systems by which people share their difficulties with specific people in communities. Some people in rural communities have more information about people than others. One of the participants stated, "Rural people talk to specific people in their communities regarding their difficulties. This is because specific types of people have various social resources and connections with their stakeholders. Some of them are stakeholders themselves." (Participant 15, 81-year-old woman) People well known for their connection to social resources in communities had much information, which caused the localization of community information regarding health and social problems. One participant stated, "A few people may know most of the community issues, so they must connect various resources to social support. However, this approach may be ineffective in certain cases. This is because the number of people with social issues has increased, and these issues have varied compared with the past." (Participant 24, 71-year-old man) In rural contexts, social issues are complicated; therefore, previous methods to solve these issues have been difficult to implement.

Rural communities have mutual help established through continual community interactions. When people have health and social problems, others can help them sustain stable community conditions. One of the participants stated, "In rural communities, people have deep relationships and are dependent on others. Rural people may believe that they cannot live alone. I try to get help from other community members, and others ask me for help. We mutually help in usual cases because mutual help is vital in rural communities that lack resources." (Participant 33, 82-year-old woman) Rural people can use specific lay care services in their communities to sustain their conditions. One participant stated, "In particular, older people can get help from others to go to medical institutions when they have symptoms. They can obtain over-the-counter drugs or home remedies from community members." (Participant 18, 56-year-old woman) Establishing rural relationships among people can help sustain effective lives. However, as social conditions changed and mutual help decreased, rural residents faced more challenges. One of the participants stated, "Mutual help is vital in rural communities, but an increasing number of people here cloister themselves in their homes and confess their difficulties. These relationships need to be reconsidered in rural communities." (Participant 38, 70-year-old man) Present rural conditions are becoming unsustainable and ineffective in supporting community members.

Connections driving community health

Respect for the present community culture has been suggested to overcome rural communities' challenges. Rural communities have undergone social changes and have faced various social problems, such as social isolation and reduced mutual help. Recognizing present rural conditions and realizing the preciousness of rural social resources was considered the standpoint for dealing with such social issues. One of the participants stated, "Social changes may not be stopped, and present trends can progress more. Present conditions should be respected for the sustainability of rural communities. Returning to the previous situation is impossible, although some may think about it. Therefore, new approaches should be applied in rural areas." (Participant 33, 68-year-old man) The exclusiveness of rural communities limits their changes. However, the participants believed that, for the sustainability of rural communities, rural citizens had to change their perceptions by collaborating with various people from outside their communities and minorities. One of the participants stated, "I think we have to change the attitudes to things outside the communities. Accepting new things can be beneficial for creating sustainable communities. An increasing number of people should be accepted into communities to activate culture and interaction." (Participant 40, 70-year-old woman) Another participant stated, “Our younger people are leaving for cities, leaving our elderly isolated and our community less vibrant.” (Participant 32, 67-year-old man) These statements highlighted the necessity of policies that address the outflow of younger individuals and consider ways to integrate diverse populations, including immigrants and minorities from different regions and countries, into the rural fabric.

Healthcare is essential for the sustainability of rural communities. Smooth collaboration with healthcare providers is critical for older rural populations. Participants hoped to connect with medical facilities more than they do now. One participant stated, "Previously, I was reluctant to communicate with other medical professionals. However, as I grew older, I needed medical care. Currently, I do not have an effective relationship with healthcare professionals. I regret my previous attitude toward healthcare." (Participant 28, a 73-year-old man) Establishing relationships with healthcare providers is vital for older adults in rural communities. However, rural communities do not collaborate with healthcare facilities, especially medical professionals. Therefore, rural stakeholders hope to collaborate with community medical professionals. One of the participants stated, "I hope to have a better relationship with medical professionals in the community. I shrink in medical institutions and cannot express my ideas." (Participant 2, a 66-year-old woman).

Active engagement of physicians in community activities is expected in rural communities. The participants expressed a sense of detachment from medical professionals, specifically from physicians. One of the participants stated, "Physicians are challenging to approach, even if I have some symptoms. I feel far from them. I go to a hospital when I have symptoms, but usually, I cannot ask them about trivial symptoms." (Participant 19, an 84-year-old woman) For effective community health, the involvement of physicians in community care and dialogue with citizens is essential. One of the participants stated, "If possible, I hope that physicians go out of hospitals and come to our communities. Initially, people in communities may be surprised, but when they can construct a relationship with physicians, they can express their anxiety and symptoms." (Participant 51, a 71-year-old man) Early detection and prevention of symptoms are essential for effective community healthcare. Establishing physician-citizen relationships and engaging physicians in community care could mitigate the limitations of citizens visiting medical care facilities for symptom prevention. One participant stated, "Older people may hesitate to visit medical care facilities despite their symptoms. When they consider physicians' friendly and open-minded engagement, they can confess their symptoms, prevent symptom progression, and continue their lives in their communities." (Participant 27, a 77-year-old woman).

Discussion

This study, grounded in social cognitive theory, delves into the complexities of sustaining rural communities amidst social and relational changes. Social cognitive theory highlights the interplay between personal, behavioral, and environmental factors and provides a comprehensive framework for understanding these multifaceted challenges [26].

Our findings underscore that increased social isolation in rural contexts results from many social changes. These changes are supported by previous studies [29, 30] and include factors such as the migration of young people due to a lack of employment opportunities and stimulating environments [31]. This exodus alters the demographic composition and impacts the social fabric of rural communities. Such environmental shifts highlight social cognitive theory's emphasis on how external factors influence personal and collective behaviors, necessitating nuanced policy considerations [32].

Privacy issues, as revealed by our study [33, 34], pose another challenge. The need for personal privacy often conflicts with mutual support requirements in rural settings. This dichotomy adversely affects the health of rural populations [35, 36], demonstrating the theory’s assertion that personal beliefs significantly influence communal engagement and health behaviors. This suggests that interventions in rural healthcare must balance individual privacy concerns with the collective need for social support and healthcare accessibility.

Our research further identifies a significant increase in the variety and number of health issues faced by rural communities, presenting a formidable challenge to existing support systems [37]. Traditional methods, which depend heavily on specific influential community members [38, 39], may no longer suffice in the face of these evolving challenges. These observations resonate with the social cognitive framework, which posits that behavioral patterns within a community are influenced by both personal beliefs and the broader social and political context [26]. The complexity of these patterns necessitates stronger inter-community relationships and improved integration with healthcare facilities [40, 41].

The role of physicians in rural healthcare settings cannot be overstated [42, 43]. Our study highlights their critical function in enhancing health-seeking behaviors and improving health conditions in rural areas [44, 45]. This aligns with the social cognitive perspective, where physicians can serve as role models, leveraging observational learning to encourage better health practices. However, challenges remain regarding the cost-effectiveness and feasibility of increased physician involvement [46, 47]. This raises the need for innovative and economically sustainable models of healthcare delivery that can effectively leverage the influence of medical professionals in rural settings.

Moreover, the social cognitive theory underscores the importance of reciprocal determinism—the dynamic and reciprocal interaction of person, environment, and behavior [26]. In rural healthcare, this concept manifests in how individual health beliefs and practices are shaped by, and in turn, shape, the social and physical environment. For instance, the aging population in rural areas presents unique challenges [42, 43]. Aging not only impacts individual health but also influences community health needs and the demand for healthcare services [26]. Therefore, healthcare interventions in these settings must be tailored to address the specific needs of an aging population while also considering the broader social and environmental context.

Additionally, the theory’s emphasis on self-efficacy is particularly relevant. Self-efficacy, or the belief in one's ability to effect change, is a critical factor in adopting healthy behaviors. In rural communities, enhancing self-efficacy could involve community-led health initiatives and education programs that empower individuals to take an active role in their health and the health of their community [26]. Such initiatives can foster a sense of agency and collective efficacy, essential for tackling the complex health issues these communities face.

Furthermore, the theory's focus on observational learning suggests that successful health interventions in rural areas might involve leveraging local influencers and healthcare professionals as role models [26]. These individuals can demonstrate healthy behaviors and practices, thereby influencing others in the community to adopt similar behaviors [26]. This approach can be more effective, accompanied by health dialogue with family physicians in addressing the challenges posed by social isolation and the need for community solidarity in health management. The following studies should investigate the continual effects on health behaviors and quality of life of rural people [48, 49].

This study had several limitations. For credibility, triangulation was performed for thematic analysis. However, owing to the limited resources in rural contexts, only three researchers conducted this study. To improve credibility, we conducted this study over a period of 1 year. Regarding transferability, this study included various participants' descriptions but included participants from only Japanese rural communities, without maximum variation sampling. This study can be applied to rural communities with aging issues; however, further studies are required in different educational contexts. This study considered theoretical saturation, iterative data collection, and analysis to ensure dependability. However, regarding reflexivity, only three researchers with backgrounds in rural community health specialties discussed and reflected on the interview content. For better confirmation, the results of this study should be discussed with researchers in other fields.

Conclusion

This study underscores the complex interplay of personal, behavioral, and environmental factors influencing the sustainability of rural communities. Challenges such as social isolation, heightened by privacy concerns and diminished community intimacy, highlight the need for balancing individual privacy with communal support. The evolving social and health landscape in rural areas necessitates adaptable and robust support systems capable of addressing an increasing variety of health issues. Critical to this adaptation is the establishment of collaborative relationships between rural communities and medical institutions, particularly the engagement of physicians, who play a key role in modeling healthy behaviors and influencing community health practices. Future research should focus on developing concrete, culturally sensitive methods for collaboration between rural communities and medical professionals, leveraging the strengths of social cognitive theory. Enhancing community engagement and healthcare collaboration can foster a more sustainable and healthful future for rural populations.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed in the current study may be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

HSB:

Help-seeking behavior

References

  1. Ye T, Niehoff JU, Zhang Y, Zhang L. Which medical institution should perform gatekeeping in rural China? Results from a cross-sectional study. Gesundheitswesen. 2017;79:e10-17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tancred T, Mandu R, Hanson C, Okuga M, Manzi F, Peterson S, et al. How people-centred health systems can reach the grassroots: experiences implementing community-level quality improvement in rural Tanzania and Uganda. Health Policy Plan. 2018;33:e1-13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dang BN, Westbrook RA, Njue SM, Giordano TP. Building trust and rapport early in the new doctor-patient relationship: a longitudinal qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Berger R, Bulmash B, Drori N, Ben-Assuli O, Herstein R. The patient-physician relationship: an account of the physician’s perspective. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2020;9:33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Blasini AW, Waiswa P, Wanduru P, Amutuhaire L, Moyer CA. Even when people live just across the road… they won’t go: Community health worker perspectives on incentivized delays to under-five care-seeking in urban slums of Kampala, Uganda. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0244891.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hosaka KRJ. Reflections on a community health elective in native hawaiian health: a community-centred vision for health and the medical profession in indigenous contexts. Aust J Prim Health. 2019;25:415–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohta R, Ryu Y, Kitayuguchi J, Gomi T, Katsube T. Challenges and solutions in the continuity of home care for rural older people: a thematic analysis. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2020;39:126–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jensen N, Suchman A, Dart R. Partnering with citizens to reform Wisconsin health care: a report of Citizen Congress II. WMJ. 2006;105:41–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gruen RL, Pearson SD, Brennan TA. Physician-citizens–public roles and professional obligations. JAMA. 2004;291:94–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McLaughlin CP. Rebuilding community and regional collaboration: the Kingsport, Tennessee experience. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998;24:601–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boivin A, Dumez V, Castonguay G, Berkesse A. The ecology of engagement: fostering cooperative efforts in health with patients and communities. Health Expect. 2022;25:2314–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohta R, Ryu Y, Sano C. Fears related to COVID-19 among rural older people in Japan. Healthc (Basel). 2021;9:524.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joshi A. COVID-19 pandemic in India: through psycho-social lens. J Soc Econ Dev. 2021;23(Suppl 2):1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Françoise M, Frambourt C, Goodwin P, Haggerty F, Jacques M, Lama ML, et al. Evidence based policy making during times of uncertainty through the lens of future policy makers: four recommendations to harmonise and guide health policy making in the future. Arch Public Health. 2022;80:140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Rämgård M, Ramji R, Kottorp A, Forss KS. No one size fits all’ - community trust-building as a strategy to reduce COVID-19-related health disparities. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Burlacu A, Mavrichi I, Crisan-Dabija R, Jugrin D, Buju S, Artene B, et al. Celebrating old age: an obsolete expression during the COVID-19 pandemic? Medical, social, psychological, and religious consequences of home isolation and loneliness among the elderly. Arch Med Sci. 2021;17:285–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Souza CTV, Santana CS, Ferreira P, Nunes JA, Teixeira MLB, Gouvêa MIFDS. Caring in the age of COVID-19: lessons from science and society. Cad Saude Publica. 2020;36:e00115020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aldalaykeh M, Al-Hammouri MM, Rababah J, Al-Dwaikat T. COVID-19 help-seeking behaviors: application of the theory of planned behavior. Psychol Belg. 2021;61:391–400.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu H, Zhang L, Wang W, Huang Y, Li S, Ren Z, et al. Prediction of online psychological help-seeking behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interpretable machine learning method. Front Public Health. 2022;10:814366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Franco CM, Lima JG, Giovanella L. Primary healthcare in rural areas: access, organization, and health workforce in an integrative literature review. Cad Saude Publica. 2021;37:e00310520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Roberts LW. Recognizing rural health resource and education needs. Acad Med. 2022;97:1251–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohta R, Ryu Y, Sano C. Older people’s help-seeking behaviors in rural contexts: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:3233.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Mayfield CA, Sparling A, Hardeman G, de Hernandez BU, Pasupuleti N, Carr J, et al. Development, implementation, and results from a COVID-19 messaging campaign to promote health care seeking behaviors among community clinic patients. J Community Health. 2021;46:728–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dickson-Swift V, Kangutkar T, Knevel R, Down S. The impact of COVID-19 on individual oral health: a scoping review. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:422.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wong SYS, Zhang D, Sit RWS, Yip BHK, Chung RYN, Wong CKM, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on loneliness, mental health, and health service utilisation: a prospective cohort study of older adults with multimorbidity in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2020;70:e817-824.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Islam KF, Awal A, Mazumder H, Munni UR, Majumder K, Afroz K, et al. Social cognitive theory-based health promotion in primary care practice: a scoping review. Heliyon. 2023;9:e14889.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ohta R, Ryu Y, Kataoka D, Sano C. Effectiveness and challenges in local self-governance: multifunctional autonomy in Japan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:574.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Chapman AL, Hadfield M, Chapman CJ. Qualitative research in healthcare: an introduction to grounded theory using thematic analysis. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2015;45:201–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Repke MA, Ipsen C. Differences in social connectedness and perceived isolation among rural and urban adults with disabilities. Disabil Health J. 2020;13:10082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. de Koning J, Richards SH, Wood GER, Stathi A. Profiles of loneliness and social isolation in physically active and inactive older adults in rural England. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:3971.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Grenier A, Burke E, Currie G, Watson S, Ward J. Social isolation in later life: the importance of place, disadvantage and diversity. J Aging Soc Policy. 2022;34:471–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hussain R, Wark S, Ryan P. Caregiving, employment and social isolation: challenges for rural carers in Australia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:2267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Pullyblank K. A scoping literature review of rural beliefs and attitudes toward telehealth utilization. West J Nurs Res. 2023;45:375–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rudolph AE, Young AM, Havens JR. A rural/urban comparison of privacy and confidentiality concerns associated with providing sensitive location information in epidemiologic research involving persons who use drugs. Addict Behav. 2017;74:106–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Craig C. Community determinants of health for rural elderly. Public Health Nurs. 1994;11:242–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. de la Luz Martínez-Maldonado M, Correa-Muñoz E, Mendoza-Núñez VM. Program of active aging in a rural Mexican community: a qualitative approach. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Adam D, Hoehne D. Mutual aid in remote areas: addressing the obstacles. Can Ment Health. 1989;37:18–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mishra A, Singh AK, Parida SP, Pradhan SK, Nair J. Understanding community participation in rural health care: a participatory learning and action approach. Front Public Health. 2022;10:860792.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Markham R, Hunt M, Woollard R, Oelke N, Snadden D, Strasser R, et al. Addressing rural and indigenous health inequities in Canada through socially accountable health partnerships. BMJ Open. 2021;11:53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Groft JN, Hagen B, Miller NK, Cooper N, Brown S. Adolescent health: a rural community’s approach. Rural Remote Health. 2005;5:366.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Nott S, Colbran R, Edwards M. Collaborative care - empowering community in the development of rural primary health workforce and service delivery models. Rural Remote Health. 2023;23:8129.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Akugizibwe R, Calderón-Larrañaga A, Roso-Llorach A, Onder G, Marengoni A, Zucchelli A, et al. Multimorbidity patterns and unplanned hospitalisation in a cohort of older adults. J Clin Med. 2020;9:4001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Chen G. Building, integrating, and sharing our aging society: improving older adults’ health together. China CDC Wkly. 2021;3:835–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Calano BJD, Cacal MJB, Cal CB, Calletor KP, Guce FICC, Bongar MVV, et al. Effectiveness of a community-based health programme on the blood pressure control, adherence and knowledge of adults with hypertension: a PRECEDE-PROCEED model approach. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28:1879–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Higa C, Davidson EJ, Loos JR. Integrating family and friend support, information technology, and diabetes education in community-centric diabetes self-management. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021;28:261–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Walker PH, Stone PW. Exploring cost and quality: community-based versus traditional hospital delivery systems. J Health Care Finance. 1996;23:23–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ohta R, Katsube T, Sano C. Challenges in help-seeking behaviors among rural older people mitigated through family physician-driven outreach: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:17004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Ohta R, Sano C. Rural health dialogue for the sustainability of help-seeking behaviors among older patients: grounded theory approach. BMC Geriatr. 2023;23:674.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Ohta R, Ryu Y, Sano C. Improvement in quality of life through self-management of mild symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:6652.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the patients who participated in this research. This work was supported by Yuumi Memorial Foundation for Home Health Care.

Funding

This study received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Community Care, Unnan City Hospital, 699-1221 96-1 Iida, Daito-Cho, Unnan, Shimane Prefecture, Japan

    Ryuichi Ohta & Toshihiro Yakabe

  2. Department of Community Medicine Management, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, 89-1 Enya Cho, Izumo, Shimane Prefecture, 693-8501, Japan

    Chiaki Sano

Authors
  1. Ryuichi Ohta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Toshihiro Yakabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chiaki Sano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, R. O. and T. Y.; methodology, R. O.; validation, R. O. and C. S.; formal analysis, R. O., T. Y., and C. S.; investigation, R. O. and T. Y.; data curation, R. O. and T. Y.; writing—original draft preparation, R. O. and C. S.; writing—review and editing, R. O. and C. S.; visualization, R. O.; supervision, C. S.; project administration, R. O. and T. Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryuichi Ohta.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Unnan City Hospital (protocol code 20220004; date of approval: March 2021).

Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ohta, R., Yakabe, T. & Sano, C. Addressing health challenges in rural Japan: a thematic analysis of social isolation and community solutions. BMC Prim. Care 25, 26 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02266-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02266-y

Keywords

BMC Primary Care

ISSN: 2731-4553

Contact us