Skip to main content

Table 3 Description of reviews

From: The impact of eHealth on relationships and trust in primary care: a review of reviews

Review

Type of review

Type of technology

Setting

Description of patients

Description of providers

Management systems

 Shachak et al. (2009) [92]

Literature review

Electronic Medical Records and Computer Physician Order Entry systems

Primary care clinics

Not described

Physicians (general practitioners, family medicine, internal medicine residents, ER doctors), faculty internists, nurses

 Irani et al. (2009) [96]

Systematic review

Electronic Health Records used in the examination room

Ambulatory care, outpatient office settings

Not described for all studies, one study included patients with hypertension and dyslipidemia, another included paediatric patients

Physicians

 McGinn et al. (2011) [97]

Systematic review

Electronic Health Records, Electronic Medical Records, computerized patient information systems and medical records, personal health records, portable computers, smart card and summary care records

Not described

Not described

Mostly physicians, nurses, less commonly pharmacists, midwives, social workers

 Bassi et al. (2012) [98]

Systematic review

Information Communication Technologies (including Electronic Medical Records and other types like computer-based information systems, computerized claims or billing systems, computerized scheduling or prescribing systems)

Ambulatory physician office practices (including primary care settings)

Not described

Family physicians/general practitioners, specialists including ophthalmologists pediatricians, internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, physician assistants, nurses, nurse practitioners

 Kazmi et al. (2013) [89]

Systematic review

Electronic Health Records

Outpatient settings

Not described

Physicians

 Nguyen et al. (2014) [99]

Systematic literature review

Electronic Health Records

Primary care, secondary care, tertiary care, ambulatory care, long-term care, community and consumer based, cross-sectional (spanning over one care level)

Not described

Doctors and nurses

 Alkureishi et al. (2015) [79]

Systematic review

Electronic Medical Records

Mostly outpatient primary care settings, some in specialty clinic and inpatient settings

Mostly adult and some paediatric patients

Not described

 Rathert et al. (2017) [91]

Systematic review

Electronic Health Records and Electronic Medical Records (referred to together as EHR)

Any health service setting

Adult patients excluding dental or psychiatric patients, participants not described

Physicians

 Mold et al. (2018) [100]

Systematic review

Computerized Medical Records and online services

Primary care

Adult patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Not described

 Wisner et al. (2019) [101]

Integrative review

Electronic Health Records

Hospital settings including mostly inpatient acute care units

Not described

Mostly registered nurses, also included physicians and midwives

 Diffin et al. (2019) [102]

Systematic realist review

Patient Personal Health Records

Children’s hospital, disease specific outpatient clinics and departments within hospitals, primary care, rehabilitation hospital, special education schools/units, not-for-profit organizations

Children and young persons (0–24 years) including adolescents with intellectual disability, depressive symptoms, complex health and palliative needs, cystic fibrosis, diabetes mellitus, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, asthma, autism spectrum diagnosis

Not described

 Lordon et al. (2020) [81]

Systematic review

Patient Generated Health Data

Mostly primary care, one paper focused on surgical setting

Not described

Not described

 Benjamins et al. (2021) [66]

Scoping review

Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records

Varied settings, including hospitals and primary care

Broad range of adult patients, with some papers focusing on specific patient groups including cancer, cardiac, chronically ill, HIV-positive, psychiatric, gynecologic patients and veterans

Not described

 Tapuria et al. (2021) [95]

Systematic review

Electronic Health Records that could be accessed by patients through patient portals

Not described

Not described

Not described

 Wark et al. (2021) [60]

Scoping review

Electronic Health Records

Not described

Not described

Not described

 Zurynski et al. (2021) [103]

Scoping review

Electronic Medical Records

Primary studies were conducted in different settings including psychiatric hospitals, mental health facilities, psychiatry services, primary care clinics, child and youth psychiatry clinics, community mental health clinics

One review focused on mental health settings, others focused on other health settings

Not described

Mental health professionals including psychiatrists, psychologists, nurses, and other professionals invovled in treating people with mental health disorders including allied health professionals

 Schwarz et al. (2022) [104]

Scoping review

Patient-accessible electronic health records (PAEHR)

Inpatient and outpatient mental health settings and primary care settings

Service users with mental health conditions, veterans

Healthcare professionals (including mental health professionals like psychologists, social workers and nurses, general medical practitioners)

Communication systems

 Verhoeven et al. (2010) [105]

Systematic review

Asychronous (most studies) or synchronous teleconsultation or a combination of both

Primary, secondary, tertiary and integrated care settings

Patients with diabetes

Specialized nurses, other specialists, primary care providers, case managers or professional role not specified

 Brewster et al. (2013) [106]

Systematic review

Technology to remotely fulfill healthcare needs (including video-phone links and remote monitoring equipment)

Not described

Patients with COPD and CHF

Frontline staff including general practitioners, cardiologists, nurses, hospital staff, social care staff,

 Simpson et al. (2014) [62]

Systematic review

Videoconferencing

Not described

Adult, adolescent, and child clients with wide range of mental health disorders

Psychologists

 Nguyen et al. (2015) [90]

Systematic review

Paging systems, web-based smartphone messaging systems, smartphone-linked email system, wireless email, blog, hands-free communication device

Hospitals and clinics

Not described

Trainees, nurses, attending physicians, pharmacists, medical teams, anesthesiologists

 Keijser et al. (2016) [107]

Systematic review

Health Information Technology (including phone, text messaging, email and teleconferencing)

Integrated healthcare (e.g., chronic disease management; home telecare programs; multidisciplinary team consultations; virtual integrated practice), thematic collaborations (e.g. healthcare quality improvement initiatives; communities of practice) and patient-centred online programs

Not described

Not described

 Petit et al. (2016) [108]

Scoping review

Smart devices

Primary care (preventative care)

Not described

Not described

 Henry et al. (2017) [65]

Systematic literature review

Telecommunications technologies (including phone, videophone/videoconferencing, telemonitoring, computers, electronic communication and robots)

Home care, primary and specialist care, mental health/counseling, multi-site teams, and educational settings

Not described

Healthcare providers, students, and trainees

 Richards et al. (2018) [109]

Systematic review

Mobile phones, tablets, Personal Digital Assistants, handheld devices

Non-inpatient settings or non-patient and inpatient settings

Patients with cancer (mostly adults, but also included children and adolescents)

Not described

 Watkins et al. (2018) [110]

Realist review

mHealth

All types of low-resourced settings in LMICs

Patients over 18 years of age with chronic diseases, including stroke, hypertension and HIV

Community health workers, nurses, doctors

 Penny et al. (2018) [111]

Systematic review

Telehealth through videoconferencing (one study also involved remote monitoring and another involved a web forum)

Varied settings including NICUs, chemotherapy, hospitals, hospice, home care, nursing homes, clinics, medical centres, outpatient paediatric clinics

Varied populations including paediatric (NICU, suspected child abuse) and adult populations (hospice, COPD, postpartum parents)

Registered nurses and midwives

 Walker et al. (2019) [112]

Systematic review

Remote monitoring

Not described, but study only focused on telemonitoring for non-hospitalized patients

Patients over 18 years of age with chronic health conditions, including COPD, heart failure, diabetes, end stage kidney disease and hypertension

Not described

 Qudah et al. (2019) [83]

Systematic review

mHealth apps available on smartphones or personal digital assistants

Not described

Adolescent and adult patients with mental health conditions, diabetes, cancer, pregnancy, respiratory disorders, postsurgical care and other conditions

Physicians, nurses, multidisciplinary teams, and other providers

 Foong et al. (2020) [113]

Systematic review

Telemedicine, mHealth and specific mHealth app

Clinical or community settings

Patients with diabetic foot ulcer

Nurses, physicians, podiatrists, physician assistants

 Odendaal et al. (2020) [16]

Qualitative evidence synthesis

mHealth

Primary care settings including clients’ homes, clinics, hospitals, general practices and schools

Not described

All healthcare workers, including lay, paraprofessional, and professional workers (nurses, paramedics, doctors, midwives, pharmacists, and lab staff)

 Vimalananda et al. (2020) [114]

Systematic review

e-consults

Primary care physician consultations, medical centres, tertiary academic medical centre, integrated health delivery systems, community health centres, veteran's affairs, state/city/regional/district programs, non-governmental organizations, private company

Not described

Primary care providers and specialists

 Wehmann et al. (2020) [93]

Systematic review

Email, web-based programs, telephone, and a smartphone app

Not described

Patients aged over 18 years diagnosed with unipolar depression

Therapists including Masters students and licensed psychotherapists and psychologists

 Wickramasekera et al. (2020) [115]

Systematic review

Patient-completed electronic clinical assessment tool

Secondary care settings including tertiary care centre, medical centre, cancer care clinics and centres, outpatient clinics, teaching and university hospitals, ER departments

Varied patient population including cancer, gynaecology, neurology, domestic violence, paediatric rheumatology

Mostly doctors and some studies included nurses

 LeBlanc et al. (2020) [54]

Scoping review

eHealth technologies used to remotely diagnose and treat patients (including combinations of video-conferences, telephone calls, and remote monitoring devices)

Rural health settings

Not described

Not described

 Irvine et al. (2020) [88]

Systematic review

Telephone-delivered interventions

Clinical settings and other settings like educational and occupational contexts

Individuals with clinically diagnosed mental health conditions and those presenting with sub-threshold psychological or emotional difficulties

Not described

 Thiyagarajan et al. (2020) [116]

Scoping review

Synchronous videoconferencing for two-way communication

Primary care

Not described

Not described

 Gorrie et al. (2021) [70]

Literature review

Telegenetics through videoconferencing

Not described

Patients seen for cancer, prenatal/pediatric genetic counselling

Health professionals utilizing telegenetics

 Siegel et al. (2021) [58]

Systematic review

Telephone, Zoom, Epic MyChart video visits

Not described

Not described

Psychiatrists and mental health providers

 Dalley et al. (2021) [87]

Systematic review

Telehealth videoconferencing

Primary care (telecardiology and televascular), nursing home, speech language therapy, and postoperative oncology

Not described

Not described

 Keenan et al. (2021) [72]

Systematic review

Information Communication Technology (including telehealth and non-telehealth services involving an interaction with the healthcare provider)

Not described

Not described

Not described

 Drovandi et al. (2021) [55]

Overview of systematic reviews

Remote monitoring or management technologies including synchronous teleconsultations (phone and video) mobile-based systems for image documentation, mobile phone apps, mobile outreach services, remote review of digital records, home-based monitoring devices

Not described

Adults with or at risk of diabetes-related foot disease

Clinicians managing diabetes-related foot disease

 Ferguson et al. (2021) [117]

Systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

Wearable technologies or devices that used wearable, continuous and passive monitoring

Range of settings including residential and nursing homes, hospitals, and clinics

Older patients, mean age over 65 years with a heart-related condition

Providers included doctors, nurses, general practitioners

 Howard et al. (2021) [94]

Systematic review

Not all studies involved technology-mediated interventions. Types of technology included videoconferencing, telephone and internet-based therapy

Varied settings including inpatient and outpatient settings

Patients with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder related to varied issues including childhood abuse, political violence, war trauma/veterans, illness, complex trauma exposure, dissociative disorders, schizophrenia, sexual assault

Not described

 Kinley et al. (2021) [56]

Systematic rapid realist review

Remote consultations including telephone and video consultations

Not described but focus of paper appears to be on primary care

Adults or children diagnosed with asthma

Healthcare providers (professional background not specified)

 Sharma et al. (2021) [75]

Unclear (the terms "thematic review" and "literature review" are used)

Telepsychiatry involving videoconsultation

Not described

Not described

Not described

 Spelten et al. (2021) [57]

Scoping review of reviews and review of current evidence and guidelines provided by professional bodies

Mostly telephone or videoconferencing, followed by web-based interventions

Not clearly described in all included reviews but some reviews mentioned different settings including hospitals, palliative care, hospices, community primary care

Cancer survivors with different types of cancer including breast (majority), colorectal, prostate, cervical, ovarian

Health care providers including nurses (most frequently), psychologists, physiotherapists, social workers, counsellors, peer workers

 Verma et al. (2021) [63]

Rapid review

Telemedicine

Primary care settings only

Not described

Primary care providers (professional background not described)

 Wallace et al. (2021) [76]

Scoping

Telehealth

Not described

Patients with different types of musculoskeletal pain at different sites (e.g., spine, upper limbs, lower limbs) and associated with different conditions (e.g., OA knee)

Not described

 Wu et al. (2021) [78]

Integrative review

Telemedicine including virtual synchronous visits provided through phone calls or video web conferencing

Not described, but appear to include prenatal care provided in any setting

Pregnant patients (low and high risk)

Nurses, midwives, physicians, or other health care providers providing routine prenatal care, management of gestational diabetes or maternal fetal medicine consultations

 de Albornoz et al. (2022) [68]

Systematic review

Telemedicine delivered via telephone or videoconference

Primary care only (including mental health and allied health services)

Adults aged 18 and older receiving primary care, mental health or allied health services, with a range of concerns including acute nonurgent conditions, major diagnoses (including mental disorders), respiratory infections, malnutrition, nicotine dependence, chronic conditions and post-partum care, medically unexplained pain, opioid abuse, cancer

Primary care providers including physicians and allied health staff

 Walthall et al. (2022) [77]

Unclear. The term 'Narrative synthesis' is used to describe the methodology as well as the analysis method

Remote consultations including telephone, video, and electronic consultations through text messages, websites or email

Different settings including palliative care, primary care, musculoskeletal care

Not described

Physicians, physiotherapists

 Diaz et al. (2022) [69]

Scoping review

Telemedicine including video consultations conducted by Zoom, Skype, FaceTime and via EHR mobile applications

Primary care and specialty clinics

Non-institutionalized, non-chronically ill female adolescents and young adults, ages 10–24 years

Providers serving this patient population

 Lampickiene et al. (2022) [73]

Scoping review

Videoconferencing

Not described

Not described

Healthcare professionals including mostly physicians (medical oncology, general practitioners, otolaryngologists, urologists, cardiologists, physiatrists), mental health professionals (therapists and psychotherapists), nurses, advanced practice professionals, dieticians, physical therapists

 Lindenfeld et al. (2022) [64]

Scoping review

Synchronous telemedicine consultations through videoconference or audio-only technologies

Primary care settings (large integrated health systems, academic medical centres, veterans affairs clinics)

Not described

Primary care providers (professional background not described)

Computerized Decision Support Systems

 Scalia et al. (2019) [118]

Systematic review

Patient Decision Aids designed for collaborative use during clinical encounters

Varied settings including in-hospital and outpatient clinics, hospital units, and primary care

Not described

Providers from varied disciplines including primary care clinicians, specialists, nurses, medical assistants,

 Yen et al. (2021) [119]

Systematic review

Patient Decision Aids

Varied settings including clinics, homes and research facilities

Patients on hemodialysis for kidney transplants, cancer screening, cancer surgery, total knee replacement, early intervention for developmental concerns, prenatal genetic testing, chest pain testing

Not described

 Čartolovni et al. (2022) [120]

Scoping review

Artificial Intelligence-based medical decision-support tools including machine learning, deep learning, and several papers specifically mentioned IBM's Watson

Not described

Not described

Not described

Information systems

 Farnood et al. (2015) [80]

Systematic review

Internet use on smartphones

Primary care settings

Patients over 18 years of age, not described further

Health professionals over 18 years of age, including physicians, nurses, and others

 Luo et al. (2022) [85]

Systematic review

Online health information seeking using the Internet

Range of practice settings including primary care clinics, hospitals, and medical specialist practices

Patients with range of conditions including mental health disorders (psychosis, schizophrenia) hematology-related conditions, diabetes mellitus, heart conditions, hepatitis C, dermatological conditions, rheumatological conditions, cancer, multiple sclerosis, reproductive conditions and needs, preoperative consults

Not described

Multiple technologies across categories

 Crooks et al. (2009) [121]

Systematic review

Computer use during in-person appointments, Electronic Medical Records

Primary care (family medicine)

Not described

Family doctors

 Ludwick et al. (2009) [122]

Systematic review

Computer Physician Order Entry Systems, Electronic Medical Records, Electronic Health Records, Clinical Decision Support Systems and Personal Health Records

Primary care, ambulatory care, community care and acute care settings

Not described

Not described

 Kruse et al. (2015) [123]

Systematic review

Web-based portals, medication management tools, mobile monitoring apps connected to portals

Not described, but some references made to hospitals and clinics

Patients with chronic diseases, including diabetes, obesity, heart conditions and cancer

Not described

 Barbosa et al. (2016) [61]

Integrative review

Telehealth (telephone and video) and computerized decision support tools

Not described

Not described

Nurses

 Crampton et al. (2016) [124]

Scoping review

Health Information Technologies used in face-to-face clinician encounters (desktop, laptop, mobile, tablet)

Primary care (including pediatrics and psychiatry), specialty clinics, internal medicine clinics, hospital departments, home care/OT, inpatient (simulations)

Not described

Not described

 Clarke et al. (2016) [125]

Unclear (literature or systematic review)

Internet (including websites, chat rooms, email lists, email with a healthcare provider)

Primary care

Adult patients including women with polycystic ovarian syndrome, patients with hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic conditions, non-inflammatory musculoskeletal pain, HPV infection, epilepsy, coronary heart disease, cystic fibrosis, orthopedic conditions, asthma

Not described

 Patel et al. (2017) [126]

Systematic review

Computerized systems (mostly EHRs, also included other types like order entry and decision support, or did not specify type of system)

Varied settings including large health systems, regional hospitals, primary care clinics, specialty clinics, surgical clinics, Veterans Affairs settings and simulated laboratory settings

Not described

Not described

 Barr et al. (2017) [86]

Systematic review

Information Communication Technologies (including Electronic Health Records, telehealth, online communities and learning resources)

Varied settings including primary care, hospitals, community care, long-term care

Individuals with medically complex conditions, depression, hypertension, obesity, Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure/arrhythmia, cancer

Family physicians, nurses, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, physical and occupational therapists, speech language therapists, pathologists, dieticians

 Rouleau et al. (2017) [53]

Overview of systematic reviews

Information Communication Technologies including management systems (e.g., Electronic Medical Records, Electronic Health Records), communication systems (e.g., email, mobile phone, telemedicine or telehealth using videoconferencing), and computerized decision support systems (e.g., medication management technology)

Varied settings including emergency departments, in-hospital units and clinics, primary care, ambulatory clinics, long-term care, home and community care

Not described

Registered nurses, nurses in training, nursing students

 Adjekum et al. (2018) [59]

Scoping review

Digital health

Not described

Patients or the public, not described further

Pharmacists, OTs, PTs, physicians and nurses, medical and nursing students

 Palacholla et al. (2019) [127]

Scoping review

Digital Health Technologies (including remote monitoring and management, clinical decision support, patient engagement, televisits, point-of-care, tools providing computer access to clinical data)

Mostly primary care settings

Patients managing hypertension

Not described

 Davies et al. (2020) [128]

Systematic review

Web-based mental health therapy (entirely self-directed web-based or blended with face-to-face care)

Hospitals, clinics, general community

Not described

Psychologists, social workers, general practitioners, nurses, psychiatrists

 Sunjaya et al. (2020) [84]

Systematic review

Videoconferencing, email, web and application-based platforms and online modules

Not described

Patients with post-traumatic stress disorder

Not described

 Hilty et al. (2021) [129]

Literature review

Text, sensors and wearables, e-consultation, store-and-forward technology

Primary care, including referral to and communication with specialists

Not described

Primary care providers and specialists

 Noblin et al. (2021) [82]

Systematic review

Patient portal, secure messaging, results reporting, telehomecare, Electronic Health Record, email, online immunization records, electronic Personal Health Record, eRedbook, personal child health record, 2-way messaging with providers

Not described

Adult and child patients, not described

Not described

 Al-Naher et al. (2022) [67]

Systematic review

Remote monitoring systems, clinical decision tools, patient health information platforms, online patient self-management tools, educational tools, telephone consultations, peer-support system, pharmacy-based consultation

Patients' homes (majority), community including workplace, hospitals and clinics

Adults diagnosed with chronic heart failure of all severities

Health care professionals involved in their care, professional background not specified

 Giordan et al. (2022) [130]

Systematic review

Mobile apps via smartphones or tablets (for telemonitoring with transfer of data to providers, self-management support, patient access to electronic medical records, or direct clinician communication)

Not described

Adult patients with heart failure

Not described

 Hartasanchez et al. (2022) [71]

Systematic review

Synchronous (e.g., video consults, technology used in preparation for synchronous consult like symptom tracking device) and asynchronous remote shared decision making (e.g., patient-clinician conversation using apps)

Primary care clinics, tertiary referral centres, and academic departments

Adults with chronic conditions (including cancer, diabetes, vascular or cardiovascular conditions, Parkinson's disease, uterine or prostatic hyperplasia, hip/knee/back pain), young adults with infertility, mental health conditions

Healthcare providers (professional backgrounds not specified)

 Shah et al. (2022) [74]

Narrative review

Social media (Facebook, YouTube); mobile apps; websites; text messaging; blended, telephone-based, video-conferencing delivered in real time; multitechnology interventions

Not described

Patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis or pain both pre and post joint replacement surgery

Provider background not specified in some included studies, but mostly included providers from different professional backgrounds like physiotherapists and nurses