Skip to main content
Download PDF

Implementation of non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of hypertension in primary care: a narrative review of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, barriers, and facilitators

BMC Primary Care volume 23, Article number: 298 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The current guidelines for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of hypertension recommend six types of non-pharmacological interventions: alcohol reduction, salt intake reduction, increased potassium intake, physical activity, weight loss, and heart-healthy diets. However, the non-pharmacological interventions are still not widely used in primary care. In this paper, we, therefore, reviewed and summarised the evidence on the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, barriers, and facilitators of non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of hypertension in primary care.

Methods

A thorough literature search was conducted in Embase, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases, to identify the most recent reviews or, in their absence, primary studies on alcohol reduction, salt intake reduction, potassium supplementation, physical activity, weight reduction, heart-healthy diets, and other non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of hypertension in primary care.

Results

Alcohol reduction is a non-pharmacological intervention for the treatment of hypertension in primary care with proven effectiveness, feasibility, and acceptability. Interventions for sodium intake reduction, physical activity, and weight reduction are effective but there is insufficient evidence regarding their feasibility and acceptability in primary care settings. Evidence on the effectiveness of potassium intake and heart-healthy diets is limited and inconsistent. There is a lack of evidence on the cost-effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in the treatment of hypertension. The most common barriers to deliver such interventions related to healthcare providers include a lack of time, knowledge, self-confidence, resources, clear guidelines, and financial incentives. The most common barriers related to patients include a lack of motivation and educational resources. Less evidence is available on facilitators of implementing non-pharmacological interventions in primary care. Besides, facilitators differed by different types of interventions.

Conclusions

Available evidence suggests that more pragmatic, clinically feasible, and logistically simple interventions are required for sodium intake reduction, physical activity, and weight reduction in primary care settings. Future studies should provide further evidence on the effectiveness of weight control, potassium intake, and heart-healthy diets. More research is also needed on cost-effectiveness and facilitators of all types of effective non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of hypertension in primary care.

Peer Review reports

Background

There is a wealth of literature on alcohol intake, high salt intake, low potassium intake, physical inactivity, obesity, and unhealthy diet as key determinants of high blood pressure. A recent systematic review demonstrated that consumption of five or more standard alcoholic drinks per day is associated with a 74% greater risk for hypertension [1]. A pooled analysis of 133,118 individuals showed that an additional gram of dietary sodium intake per day is associated with an average increase in systolic blood pressure of 2.58 mmHg [2]. Low potassium intake was found to be associated with an increased risk of hypertension [3]. Around 6% of hypertension cases can be attributed to low potassium intake [3]. Likewise, physical inactivity was found to be associated with an increased risk of hypertension [4]. The population attributable fraction of hypertension due to physical inactivity is 13% [4]. Jayadi et al. [5] performed a meta-regression analysis with a pooled sample of 2.3 million participants from 57 prospective cohort studies and found a significant positive relationship between body mass index (BMI) and blood pressure. A five-unit increase in BMI was associated with a 49% higher risk of hypertension [5]. Furthermore, high intake of red meat, processed meat, and high-fat dairy products and low intake of fruit and vegetables may increase the risk of hypertension [6, 7]. For example, red meat consumption is associated with 22% increased risk of hypertension [8]. Importantly, these risk factors are modifiable, and their modification (i.e. reducing alcohol consumption, reducing salt intake, increasing potassium intake, increasing physical activity, reducing body weight, and improving diet) may, therefore, play an important role in the prevention and management of high blood pressure.

A recent review found that a reduction in alcohol of 16–80% across 14 intervention trials was associated with an average reduction in systolic blood pressure of 3 mmHg [9]. The effect seems to be greater in hypertensive and medicated patients [9], and among those who drink more than two standard alcoholic drinks per day [10]. Several systematic reviews have consistently reported that salt reduction is associated with a significant reduction in blood pressure [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Salt reduction strategies were found to be associated with an average change in systolic blood pressure of -3.9 mmHg to -5.9 mmHg [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. The blood pressure-lowering effect induced by a reduction in salt intake was found to be greater among hypertensive individuals [17]. The negative effect of high salt intake on blood pressure was found to be attenuated by potassium supplementation, as it may facilitate the removal of excess sodium from the body. The importance of potassium supplementation for blood pressure reduction has been substantiated by the findings of a systematic review [19]. The study reported that an increased potassium intake achieved through changes in diet or the use of dietary supplements was associated with an average reduction in systolic blood pressure of 4.7 mmHg, and that the reduction was greater among those who consumed more dietary salt [19]. Likewise, various types of physical activity, such as aerobic exercise [20], isometric and dynamic resistance training [21,22,23,24], and light-intensity incidental physical activity such as standing or walking at work [25, 26] are significantly associated with blood pressure reduction. Interventions that caused any weight loss were found to be associated with an average reduction in systolic blood pressure of 2.68 mmHg [27]. Furthermore, heart-healthy diets, such as Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet, Mediterranean diet, low-carbohydrate diet, diet with low-glycaemic index, low-sodium diet, and low-fat diet were found to be effective in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive and pre-hypertensive individuals [28].

Taking into account the evidence on their effectiveness, the current guidelines for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of hypertension issued by the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association recommend six types of non-pharmacological interventions, including alcohol intake reduction, salt intake reduction, increased potassium intake, physical activity, weight loss, and heart-healthy diets [29]. The International Society of Hypertension guidelines also highlighted the importance of non-pharmacological interventions and recommended them to be used along with the antihypertensive medications for optimum control of hypertension [30]. Additionally, growing evidence suggests that some of the non-pharmacological interventions could help reduce the needed dosage of antihypertensive medication or result in a greater reduction in blood pressure if they are used combined with medications [31,32,33]. The body of evidence on other non-pharmacological interventions, such as yoga, healthy drinks, and stress reduction, is also growing [30, 34].

However, the non-pharmacological interventions are still not widely used in primary care. For example, less than one in four general practitioners in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK assesses alcohol intake and recommend alcohol reduction among their hypertensive patients [35]. Similarly, around one-third of primary care providers in the USA reported that their patients were unlikely to comply with the advice to reduce salt intake [36]. Also, in the UK, 90% of the overweight patients did not receive weight management intervention at primary care [37].

In this paper, we, therefore, thoroughly reviewed and summarised the evidence on the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, barriers, and facilitators of non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of hypertension in primary care and provided recommendations for future research in this area.

Methods

A thorough literature search was conducted in Embase, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases. The search keywords included “hypertension” or “blood pressure” combined with keywords for common non-pharmacological interventions for hypertension including “non-pharmacological intervention”, “lifestyle modification”, “alcohol”, “salt”, “potassium”, “physical activity”, “weight”, “diet”, and “DASH”. Forward and backward reference searches were performed to identify additional relevant studies.

The most recent review papers or, in their absence, primary studies on alcohol reduction, salt reduction, potassium intake, physical activity, weight control, and heart-healthy diets in primary care were included in the review.

Key findings from the included papers in regard to non-pharmacological intervention for the treatment of hypertension in primary care were extracted. We focused on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the interventions and on barriers to and facilitators to their implementation in primary care. When extracting findings on barriers and facilitators, we relied on the categorisations that were originally provided in the included studies. The extracted data were narratively summarised.

Alcohol reduction

Brief alcohol interventions with the aim to reduce alcohol consumption have shown to be effective when delivered in the primary care setting [38]. A systematic review found that this intervention reduces alcohol intake by on average 38 g per week [39]. Kaner et al. [40], in their recent systematic review, found a slightly lower overall effect size. The participants who received a brief intervention reduced the alcohol intake on average by 26 g. The intervention was found to be more effective among the individuals who are at a lower risk of alcohol dependence [41, 42], or if the intervention is delivered by a nurse [43]. A recent study also suggested that hypertensive patients at primary care could benefit from a brief alcohol intervention delivered by physicians with the aim to reduce blood pressure [41]. Rehm et al. recommended several strategies to reduce alcohol intake among hypertensive patients in primary care [44]. The recommendations include screening for harmful alcohol use and applying Brief Advice [alcohol reduction] for newly diagnosed or untreated hypertensive patients in primary care [44]. Studies have shown that implementing a brief alcohol intervention in the primary healthcare setting is a cost-effective strategy to reduce alcohol consumption [45]. However, evidence on the effectiveness of this intervention among individuals with severe alcohol dependence, women, older adults, younger adults, minority groups, and those from low- and middle-income countries is scarce [38, 42].

Several challenges have been identified when implementing brief alcohol interventions in the primary care setting (Table 1). The common barriers to its implementation include physician’s time constraints, hesitancy to provide counselling to patients on alcohol reduction, the stigma attached to alcohol use, and a lack of skills and knowledge [46,47,48]. The use of electronic devices and mobile phones to deliver the intervention may address some of the barriers in the implementation process [49,50,51,52], but further research is required to confirm their usefulness specifically in the primary care setting. Likewise, it was suggested that specialised training, support, and financial reimbursement could also encourage medical practitioners in primary care units to routinely assess patients’ alcohol consumption [48, 53]. Furthermore, delegating work to a non-physician specialist and tailoring interventions to patient needs could also facilitate the implementation of brief alcohol interventions in primary care [48].

Table 1 Summary of findings on non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of hypertension in primary care
Full size table

Salt intake reduction

Informational interventions and dietary counselling are the most common strategies applied to reduce salt intake in hypertensive patients [77].

Hooper et al. [78], in their systematic review, demonstrated that advice-based intervention for salt reduction was significantly associated with a reduction in systolic blood pressure of on average 1.1 mmHg and urinary sodium excretion of on average 35.5 mmol/day at 13- to 60-month follow-ups. Similarly, Ferrara et al. [79] investigated the effectiveness of a lifestyle education intervention among 188 hypertensive patients at an outpatient clinic in Italy over a period of two years. They found that the intervention significantly reduced sodium intake and systolic blood pressure [79]. Lin et al. [80] also assessed the effects of a physician and patient targeted education intervention for reducing blood pressure among hypertensive patients in a clinical setting. Both patient and physician targeted interventions significantly reduced sodium intake and blood pressure [80].

In a systematic review, Ruzicka et al. [55] evaluated the feasibility of implementing effective sodium reduction strategies to treat hypertension in the primary care setting. The interventions that were not limited to mere counselling, but included provision of food, prepared meals, or intensive inpatient training sessions were difficult to be implemented by primary care providers due to a lack of time.

Alternatively, clinically feasible and logistically simple method such as single-session dietary counselling by dieticians in the outpatients setting could be effective for reducing salt intake [81]. However, further studies are required to test the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of more structured outpatient dietary counselling methods for salt reduction in the primary care setting.

Low adherence to sodium reduction interventions is a key barrier for their implementation in primary care [56]. The low adherence of patients to such interventions is usually due to their poor knowledge, attitude, and behaviour related to dietary salt intake [56, 82]. Some of the reasons for non-adherence to dietary advice are a lack of clear labelling of food products and limited choice of low-salt foods [83] and low self-efficacy for low sodium diet among hypertensive individuals [57]. A systematic review found that people are not fully aware that the food they are eating daily, such as bread and rolls, pizzas, sandwiches, tacos and burritos, cured meats and cold cuts, chicken, eggs and omelettes, soups, and cheese often contain a high amount of salt [82, 84]. Some studies have shown that even those who are aware of the salt/sodium intake guidelines often do not follow them, as they do not want to compromise their preferred taste of food [77]. Liem et al. found that consumers added more salt to a soup when it had a “reduced-salt” label, to compensate for the perceived lack of salt in the product [85]. At primary care physician level, the barriers to implementation of dietary sodium reducing counselling are lack of time and lack of reimbursement [36]. Furthermore, the implementation of salt-reduction interventions in primary care may be further complicated by challenges in the monitoring of dietary salt intake. For example, the use of multiple 24-h urine sodium tests may not always be feasible in primary care, particularly in low resource settings [58].

Despite these challenges, health worker-led brief advice and counselling seem to be best-buy salt reduction strategies. Increasing number of healthcare providers have positive attitudes towards their role to provide guidance on salt reduction to their patients [36]. Capacity building training for health workers is required to facilitate patient counselling about sodium reduction in primary care. The World Health Organisation highlighted the importance of behaviour change communication in reducing salt intake, which would work best in the environment that promotes healthy eating [86].

Potassium intake

The common potassium supplementation interventions in hypertensive individuals include increasing potassium intake from fruit and vegetables or using potassium supplements [19, 62].

Studies examined the effects of potassium-rich diet (e.g. DASH diet) and combined interventions that promoted potassium-rich diet, physical activity, and salt reduction on blood pressure. A study conducted in a primary care unit in Finland investigated the effect of a behavioural intervention consisting of a nurse-led counselling session to increase intake of dietary potassium, promote physical activity, and reduce salt intake on blood pressure among hypertensive patients [61]. They found no significant effects of the intervention on potassium intake and blood pressure [61].

Most of the potassium supplementation trials were conducted in controlled clinical settings rather than in primary care settings [62]. Therefore, there is a dearth of information relating to the implementation and cost of potassium supplementation interventions in primary care. Cohn et al. [87], in their review, discussed the challenges of potassium supplementation interventions in clinical practice. Before providing potassium supplementation, several factors related to the patients should be accounted for, including patients’ serum potassium levels at the time of supplementation, presence of underlying medical conditions, use of medications that alter potassium levels, dietary patterns, and ability to adhere to a dietary regimen. For example, a higher blood-pressure-lowering effect was observed among those who had a lower (< 90 mmol/day) potassium intake at baseline [62]. Furthermore, there is a U‐shaped relationship between potassium intake and blood pressure, indicating that both low and high potassium intake could result in an increased blood pressure level [88]. Patients with a comorbid condition such as congestive heart failure or chronic kidneys diseases who need to strictly maintain a given potassium level and those who use non–potassium-sparing diuretics should take precautions before commencing with potassium supplementation [89]. Recently, potassium-enriched salt substitutes were found to be effective in reducing high blood pressure [90, 91]. A study conducted in sample of 20,995 adults found that low-sodium high-potassium salt substitute not only reduced blood pressure by on average 3.34 mmHg but also reduced the risk of stroke and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality during the five-year follow-up [91]. Potassium-enriched salt substitute is a promising strategy to deal with both high dietary sodium intake and low potassium intake, while ensuring higher patient adherence, compared with low salt-high potassium diets. However, further studies are required to confirm its safety and long-term benefits in the context of hypertension.

Physical activity

Brief Intervention and exercise referral schemes are two common physical activity promoting approaches in primary care patients. Brief interventions include a brief verbal advice, discussion, and encouragement with the aim to increase patient’s physical activity. Such interventions are mostly delivered by primary care practitioners such as exercise professionals, general practitioners, health coaches, health visitors, mental health professionals, midwives, pharmacists, physiotherapists, and general practice nurses [63]. A systematic review found that Brief advice on physical activity is more effective than usual care in increasing physical activity among patients [63]. The brief intervention is also cost-effective [65]. However, there is insufficient evidence regarding its effect on blood pressure, feasibility, and acceptability [92].

An exercise referral scheme, that is, a referral by a primary care or allied health professional to a physical activity specialist or service [93] was also found to be effective in increasing physical activity [64, 94]. The patients who received exercise referral increased their time in physical activity on average by 55 min more than the patients who received usual care [64]. Evidence also suggests that the compliance to physical activity recommendations following exercise referral is higher than for brief interventions [94].

However, further studies are required to confirm its cost-effectiveness. Importantly, there is a lack of evidence on the impact of exercise referral on blood pressure in hypertensive patients. It is also challenging to provide a generic recommendation for the use of exercise referral schemes in primary care, because various forms of exercise referral are being practised globally [95].

Several other types of interventions have been utilised with the aim to increase physical activity in primary care. However, they generally showed inconsistent results in increasing physical activity and lowering blood pressure. For example, three out of five studies included in the systematic review by Eden et al. [96] found a significant increase in patients’ physical activity following a clinician-led counselling intervention. In another systematic review, an intervention delivered face-to-face by health professionals was not found to be effective in increasing physical activity among patients [97]. However, for a similar intervention implemented by non-health professionals (peer health facilitators, exercise trainers) this review found a significant positive effect on physical activity [97]. Likewise, a recently published pilot study suggested that physical activity counselling for 14 weeks increases the number of steps taken per day, but has no effect on the blood pressure of hypertensive patients [98]. Significant effects on blood pressure of hypertensive patients can be expected when physical activity is combined with dietary counselling [99]. A systematic review showed that behavioural counselling on physical activity and diet reduces systolic blood pressure by on average 4.5 mmHg after 12 months and 2.3 mmHg after 12–24 months of the intervention [99].

Healthcare workers reported a lack of time and limited resources as key barriers for promoting physical activity among their patients [66]. Another study found that common facilitators and barriers for the implementation of physical activity counselling in the primary care setting are related to: practitioners’ perception of the effectiveness of physical activity in reducing hypertension; practitioners’ perception regarding patients’ interest and motivation to change their behaviour; available resources; financial incentives; conflicting priorities; and practitioners’ knowledge and confidence for prescribing physical activity [63]. The key influencing factors at the patients level are related to their motivation, the level of understanding and recall of the received advice on physical activity, fitness level, cost, lack of time, and professional, peer, family and social support [63, 67]. To address some of the barriers to promoting physical activity, Patrick et al. [100] in their review recommended healthcare delivery models that link clinical and community resources. For example, healthcare centre-based screening and advice on physical activity, followed by community support, could be a viable strategy to promote physical activity among primary care patients. Additionally, physical activity training for health workers, increased support for patients provided by providers, peers and family, and interventions tailored to the individuals’ and social needs and interests could facilitate physical activity promotion in primary care.

Weight reduction

Behaviour change interventions and restrictive diet are commonly used with the aim to reduce weight of primary care patients. For example, a meta-analysis of 15 randomised controlled trials found an average weight reduction of 1.4 kg following a behavioural change intervention (mainly by promoting low calory diet and exercise) for weight loss [68]. The behavioural change interventions are usually delivered by primary care physicians and nurses, psychologists, health educators, and nutritionists [68]. They encompass self-monitoring of diet and exercise behaviour, followed by behavioural goal setting and barrier identification or problem-solving [68]. A recent study found that a healthcare provider-led weight reduction discussion was associated with 5% greater weight reduction among overweight and obese patients, compared with patients who did not participate in such discussion [101]. Likewise, a brief counselling provided by a primary care physician resulted in an average weight loss of around 2.5 kg at 6 to 12 months follow-ups [102]. Daumit et al. [70] further suggested that a primary care-based behavioural change intervention (reducing calorie intake, increasing physical activity, and self-monitoring) would be more cost-effective if it is administered remotely (e.g. by telephone) than in person.

Furthermore, a study compared the costs of doctor’s referral to a commercially provided restrictive diet and a nurse-led behaviour change support for reducing body weight in obese patients [71]. The former was found to be more cost-effective for the routine treatment of obesity in healthcare settings [71]. Evidence also indicates that low-energy diets are more effective for weight reduction in the short term, compared with behavioural therapy [69, 71, 103]. However, their use is recommended only when a rapid weight reduction is required, and they should only be provided by trained professionals and alongside regular medical monitoring to prevent adverse events [69]. This may reduce their feasibility in the primary care setting. It is also important to note that a large regain of lost weight (> 40% for low-energy diets and > 60% for very-low-energy diets) is expected within 1–5 years [104]. Although restrictive diets are associated with a reduction in blood pressure [105,106,107], very little is known about their long-term impact on other aspects of health of people with hypertension [105].

A lack of self-motivation, a lack of self-control, inability to afford healthy foods and exercise equipment, inability to resist the temptation for unhealthy foods, competing priorities, and comorbidities are some of the impediments for weight loss [72, 73]. By contrast, higher self-motivation, incentives, rewards, and peer, professional and social support could facilitate weight loss in the long term [72]. Barriers at the level of primary care workers include: the reluctance to discuss weight management with patients; insufficient confidence, knowledge and skill to manage weight; lack of clear guidelines for weight reduction; limited resources; lack of time; and physicians’ pessimism about patients’ weight loss success [73, 74].

Primary care-based weight-reduction interventions consisting of both reduced energy intake and increased physical activity are more effective than interventions with any of these components individually [108]. Enabling access to dieticians and exercise professionals, and addressing barriers at the levels of providers and patients should be a priority in future interventions.

Heart-healthy diets

Heart-healthy diets typically include the diets with high intake of fruits and vegetables, low fat intake, consumption of whole grains, and low sodium intake. The two most commonly used dietary approaches for hypertension control are DASH and Mediterranean diet [28, 109]. They are mostly delivered by dietary education through face-to-face counselling [60] or via telephone or email [59]. They are usually delivered by primary care physicians [110], nurses, dieticians [59], nutritionists [60], and other health workers [110]. The dietary interventions are often combined with exercise, weight loss, and salt reduction interventions to achieve better results [111, 112]. The effectiveness of DASH diet for reducing blood pressure in primary care is limited. Recent studies from Brazil [60] and Hong Kong [113] did not find a significant effect of dietary counselling on blood pressure in primary care patients.

Furthermore, while implementing dietary intervention in a primary care setting it may be challenging to provide heart-healthy meals to patients and adequate counselling [55]. In addition, it is found that adherence to dietary recommendations is relatively low among patients [114]. Some of the reasons for non-adherence to DASH diet as perceived by the healthcare providers are low patient motivation, lack of provider time, and lack of educational resources for patients [75]. Primary care physicians from Canada stated that the lack of time, difficulty in assessing patient’s dietary pattern, patient’s non-adherence to dietary advice, and inconsistent dietary guidelines are the major barriers to implementation of DASH diet intervention in primary care [76]. From hypertensive patient’s perspective, the major barriers to following a recommended diets are social and environmental factors such as eating outside the home or eating food cooked by others, and lack of food choice in social gathering; lack of family support; lack of taste in diet; and cost of diet [115].

The physicians from Canada also stated that the use of electronic medical record tools that support dietary screening or counselling, access to dietitian support, and nutrition education as part of medical training would help them provide dietary advice to patients [76].

Other promising non-pharmacological interventions

Emerging evidence suggests that other non-pharmacological interventions such as yoga, stress reduction, and healthy drinks could be beneficial for reducing blood pressure [27, 30, 34]. For example, a recent meta-analysis of 49 clinical trials found that engaging in three sessions per week of yoga (including breathing techniques and meditation/mental relaxation) is associated with an average reduction in systolic blood pressure of 5 mmHg [34]. A systematic review suggested that a mindfulness-based stress reduction program is a promising behavioural therapy for reducing blood pressure in people with hypertension [116]. Studies also suggested that moderate consumption of coffee and green tea could be beneficial for reducing blood pressure [117, 118].

However, evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions in the primary care setting is limited. Only a few studies investigated the effects of yoga interventions delivered in the primary care setting on blood pressure of hypertensive patients while utilising a primary care physician to provide yoga instruction. For example, Wolf et al. conducted two such studies in Sweden [119, 120]. Their first study found an average reduction in diastolic blood pressure of around 4 mmHg, following a 12 weeks intervention. However, in their subsequent study, they did not find a statistically significant effect [120]. Dhungana et al. found that a health worker-led 3-month yoga intervention significantly reduced systolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients on average by 7.66 mmHg [121].

Regarding stress reduction, a private clinic-based study found that participation in eight 2.5-h mindfulness-based stress reduction sessions was associated with a reduction of around 12 mmHg of systolic blood pressure [122]. Although there is a dearth of evidence on the effect of stress reduction interventions on blood pressure in primary care settings, a number of studies indicated that mindfulness-based interventions are promising for improving mental health and are feasible to be implemented in primary care settings [123, 124]. Studies have also explored the potential role of green and black tea for blood pressure reduction [118]. However, no studies have investigated their applicability by physicians and health care providers for hypertension management in primary care.

Conclusion

Non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of hypertension in primary care with proven effectiveness include alcohol reduction. Intervention for sodium intake reduction, physical activity, and weight reduction is effective for blood pressure reduction, but it requires more pragmatic, clinically feasible, and logistically simple method in outpatients setting. Evidence on the effectiveness of potassium intake and heart-healthy diets is limited and inconsistent.

Given that studies have estimated only the overall cost-effectiveness of implementing non-pharmacological interventions (e.g. reduced alcohol intake, increased physical activity, weight loss), there is a lack of specific information on the cost-effectiveness of these interventions in the treatment of hypertension.

The most common barriers to deliver such interventions related to healthcare providers include a lack of time, knowledge, self-confidence, resources, clear guidelines, and financial incentives. The most common barriers related to patients include a lack of motivation and educational resources.

Less evidence is available on facilitators of implementing non-pharmacological interventions in primary care. Besides, facilitators differed by different types of interventions.

Based on the current evidence, healthcare providers should consider implementing alcohol reduction, sodium intake reduction, physical activity, and weight reduction interventions for blood pressure reduction in the primary care setting.

Future studies should provide further evidence on the effectiveness of weight control, potassium intake, and heart-healthy diets. More research is also needed on cost-effectiveness and facilitators of all types of effective non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of hypertension in primary care.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article.

References

  1. Roerecke M, Tobe SW, Kaczorowski J, Bacon SL, Vafaei A, Hasan OSM, Krishnan RJ, Raifu AO, Rehm J. Sex-specific associations between alcohol consumption and incidence of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(13):e008202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Mente A, O’Donnell MJ, Rangarajan S, McQueen MJ, Poirier P, Wielgosz A, Morrison H, Li W, Wang X, Di C, et al. Association of urinary sodium and potassium excretion with blood pressure. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(7):601–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kieneker LM, Gansevoort RT, Mukamal KJ, de Boer RA, Navis G, Bakker SJ, Joosten MM. Urinary potassium excretion and risk of developing hypertension: the prevention of renal and vascular end-stage disease study. Hypertension. 2014;64(4):769–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Al Tunaiji H, Davis JC, Mansournia MA, Khan KM. Population attributable fraction of leading non-communicable cardiovascular diseases due to leisure-time physical inactivity: a systematic review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019;5(1): e000512.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jayedi A, Rashidy-Pour A, Khorshidi M, Shab-Bidar S. Body mass index, abdominal adiposity, weight gain and risk of developing hypertension: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of more than 2.3 million participants. Obes Rev. 2018;19(5):654–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwingshackl L, Schwedhelm C, Hoffmann G, Knüppel S, Iqbal K, Andriolo V, Bechthold A, Schlesinger S, Boeing H. Food groups and risk of hypertension: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md). 2017;8(6):793–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jayedi A, Soltani S, Abdolshahi A, Shab-Bidar S. Healthy and unhealthy dietary patterns and the risk of chronic disease: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies. Br J Nutr. 2020;124(11):1133–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang Y, Zhang DZ. Red meat, poultry, and egg consumption with the risk of hypertension: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Hum Hypertens. 2018;32(7):507–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Xin X, He J, Frontini Maria G, Ogden Lorraine G, Motsamai Oaitse I, Whelton Paul K. Effects of alcohol reduction on blood pressure. Hypertension. 2001;38(5):1112–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roerecke M, Kaczorowski J, Tobe SW, Gmel G, Hasan OSM, Rehm J. The effect of a reduction in alcohol consumption on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(2):e108–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Midgley JP, Matthew AG, Greenwood CMT, Logan AG. Effect of reduced dietary sodium on blood pressure - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1996;275(20):1590–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cutler JA, Follmann D, Allender PS. Randomized trials of sodium reduction: an overview. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;65(2):643–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Graudal NA, Galloe AM, Garred P. Effects of sodium restriction on blood pressure, renin, aldosterone, catecholamines, cholesterols, and triglyceride - a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1998;279(17):1383–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. He F, MacGregor GA. Effect of modest salt reduction on blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. implications for public health. J Hum Hypertens. 2002,;16(11):761–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Graudal NA, Hubeck-Graudal T, Jurgens G: Effects of low sodium diet versus high sodium diet on blood pressure, renin, aldosterone, catecholamines, cholesterol, and triglyceride. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011(11).

  16. Aburto NJ, Ziolkovska A, Hooper L, Elliott P, Cappuccio FP, Meerpohl JJ: Effect of lower sodium intake on health: systematic review and meta-analyses. Bmj-British Medical Journal 2013, 346.

  17. He FJ, Li JF, MacGregor GA. Effect of longer term modest salt reduction on blood pressure: cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2013;346:f1325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Graudal NA, Hubeck-Graudal T, Jurgens G. Effects of low sodium diet versus high sodium diet on blood pressure, renin, aldosterone, catecholamines, cholesterol, and triglyceride. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4(4):CD004022.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Organization: Effect of increased potassium intake on blood pressure, renal function, blood lipids and other potential adverse effects. 2012.

  20. Whelton SP, Chin A, Xin X, He J. Effect of aerobic exercise on blood pressure. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(7):493–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cornelissen VA, Fagard RH. Effect of resistance training on resting blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hypertens. 2005;23(2):251–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cornelissen VA, Fagard RH, Coeckelberghs E, Vanhees L. Impact of resistance training on blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. Hypertension. 2011;58(5):950–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Owen A, Wiles J, Swaine I. Effect of isometric exercise on resting blood pressure: a meta analysis. J Hum Hypertens. 2010;24(12):796–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Inder JD, Carlson DJ, Dieberg G, McFarlane JR, Hess NC, Smart NA. Isometric exercise training for blood pressure management: a systematic review and meta-analysis to optimize benefit. Hypertens Res. 2016;39(2):88–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zeigler ZS, Mullane SL, Crespo NC, Buman MP, Gaesser GA. Effects of standing and light-intensity activity on ambulatory blood pressure. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(2):175–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zeigler ZS, Swan PD, Bhammar DM, Gaesser GA. Walking workstation use reduces ambulatory blood pressure in adults with prehypertension. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12(s1):S119–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zomer E, Gurusamy K, Leach R, Trimmer C, Lobstein T, Morris S, James WP, Finer N. Interventions that cause weight loss and the impact on cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2016;17(10):1001–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schwingshackl L, Chaimani A, Schwedhelm C, Toledo E, Pünsch M, Hoffmann G, Boeing H. Comparative effects of different dietary approaches on blood pressure in hypertensive and pre-hypertensive patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2019;59(16):2674–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE, Collins KJ, Himmelfarb CD, DePalma SM, Gidding S, Jamerson KA, Jones DW. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(19):e127–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, Khan NA, Poulter NR, Prabhakaran D, Ramirez A, Schlaich M, Stergiou GS, Tomaszewski M. 2020 International society of hypertension global hypertension practice guidelines. Hypertension. 2020;75(6):1334–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kimani S, Mirie W, Chege M, Okube OT, Muniu S. Association of lifestyle modification and pharmacological adherence on blood pressure control among patients with hypertension at Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e023995.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Whelton PK, Appel LJ, Espeland MA, Applegate WB, Ettinger J, Walter H, Kostis JB, Kumanyika S, Lacy CR, Johnson KC, Folmar S, et al. Sodium reduction and weight loss in the treatment of hypertension in older personsa randomized controlled trial of nonpharmacologic interventions in the elderly (TONE). JAMA. 1998;279(11):839–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Eckel Robert H, Jakicic John M, Ard Jamy D, de Jesus Janet M, Houston Miller N, Van Hubbard S, Lee IM, Lichtenstein Alice H, Loria Catherine M, Millen Barbara E, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC Guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(25_Part_B):2960–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu Y, Johnson BT, Acabchuk RL, Chen S, Lewis HK, Livingston J, Park CL, Pescatello LS. Yoga as antihypertensive lifestyle therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(3):432–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rehm J, Prieto JAA, Beier M, Duhot D, Rossi A, Schulte B, Zarco J, Aubin H-J, Bachmann M, Grimm C, et al. The role of alcohol in the management of hypertension in patients in European primary health care practices – a survey in the largest European Union countries. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17(1):130.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Quader ZS, Cogswell ME, Fang J, Coleman King SM, Merritt RK. Changes in primary healthcare providers’ attitudes and counseling behaviors related to dietary sodium reduction, DocStyles 2010 and 2015. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0177693.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Booth HP, Prevost AT, Gulliford MC. Access to weight reduction interventions for overweight and obese patients in UK primary care: population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(1):e006642.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. O’Donnell A, Anderson P, Newbury-Birch D, Schulte B, Schmidt C, Reimer J, Kaner E. The impact of brief alcohol interventions in primary healthcare: a systematic review of reviews. Alcohol Alcohol. 2014;49(1):66–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Bertholet N, Daeppen JB, Wietlisbach V, Fleming M, Burnand B. Reduction of alcohol consumption by brief alcohol intervention in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(9):986–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kaner EFS, Beyer FR, Muirhead C, Campbell F, Pienaar ED, Bertholet N, Daeppen JB, Saunders JB, Burnand B. Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2(2):CD004148.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chi FW, Weisner CM, Mertens JR, Ross TB, Sterling SA. Alcohol brief intervention in primary care: blood pressure outcomes in hypertensive patients. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;77:45–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Saitz R. Alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care: absence of evidence for efficacy in people with dependence or very heavy drinking. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010;29(6):631–40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Platt L, Melendez-Torres GJ, Donnell A, Bradley J, Newbury-Birch D, Kaner E, Ashton C. How effective are brief interventions in reducing alcohol consumption: do the setting, practitioner group and content matter? findings from a systematic review and metaregression analysis. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):e011473.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Rehm J, Anderson P, Prieto JAA, Armstrong I, Aubin HJ, Bachmann M, Bastus NB, Brotons C, Burton R, Cardoso M, et al. Towards new recommendations to reduce the burden of alcohol-induced hypertension in the European Union. BMC Med. 2017;15(1):173.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Angus C, Latimer N, Preston L, Li J, Purshouse R. What are the implications for policy makers? a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of screening and brief interventions for alcohol misuse in primary care. Front Psychiatry. 2014;5:114.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Glass JE, Andreasson S, Bradley KA, Finn SW, Williams EC, Bakshi AS, Gual A, Heather N, Sainz MT, Benegal V, et al. Rethinking alcohol interventions in health care: a thematic meeting of the International Network on Brief Interventions for Alcohol & Other Drugs (INEBRIA). Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2017;12(1):14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Rahm AK, Boggs JM, Martin C, Price DW, Beck A, Backer TE, Dearing JW. Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in primary care in integrated health care settings. Substance Abuse. 2015;36(3):281–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Johnson M, Jackson R, Guillaume L, Meier P, Goyder E. Barriers and facilitators to implementing screening and brief intervention for alcohol misuse: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. J Public Health. 2011;33(3):412–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Hasin DS, Aharonovich E, Greenstein E. HealthCall for the smartphone: technology enhancement of brief intervention in HIV alcohol dependent patients. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2014;9(1):5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Stoner SA, Mikko AT, Carpenter KM. Web-based training for primary care providers on screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) for alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014;47(5):362–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Donoghue K, Patton R, Phillips T, Deluca P, Drummond C. The effectiveness of electronic screening and brief intervention for reducing levels of alcohol consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(6):e142.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Beyer F, Lynch E, Kaner E. Brief interventions in primary care: an evidence overview of practitioner and digital intervention programmes. Curr Addict Rep. 2018;5(2):265–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Anderson P, Bendtsen P, Spak F, Reynolds J, Drummond C, Segura L, Keurhorst MN, Palacio-Vieira J, Wojnar M, Parkinson K, et al. Improving the delivery of brief interventions for heavy drinking in primary health care: outcome results of the optimizing delivery of health care intervention (ODHIN) five-country cluster randomized factorial trial. Addiction. 2016;111(11):1935–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rose HL, Miller PM, Nemeth LS, Jenkins RG, Nietert PJ, Wessell AM, Ornstein S. Alcohol screening and brief counseling in a primary care hypertensive population: a quality improvement intervention. Addiction. 2008;103(8):1271–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ruzicka M, Hiremath S, Steiner S, Helis E, Szczotka A, Baker P, Fodor G: What is the feasibility of implementing effective sodium reduction strategies to treat hypertension in primary care settings? A systematic review. J Hypertens 2014, 32(7):1388–1394; discussion 1394.

  56. Chan A, Kinsman L, Elmer S, Khanam M: An integrative review: adherence barriers to a low-salt diet in culturally diverse heart failure adults. 2018.

  57. Ghimire S, Shrestha N, Callahan K. Barriers to dietary salt reduction among hypertensive patients. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2018;16(2):124–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mancia G, Oparil S, Whelton PK, McKee M, Dominiczak A, Luft FC, AlHabib K, Lanas F, Damasceno A, Prabhakaran D, et al. The technical report on sodium intake and cardiovascular disease in low- and middle-income countries by the joint working group of the World Heart Federation, the European society of hypertension and the European public health association. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(10):712.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Couch SC, Saelens BE, Levin L, Dart K, Falciglia G, Daniels SR. The efficacy of a clinic-based behavioral nutrition intervention emphasizing a DASH-type diet for adolescents with elevated blood pressure. J Pediatr. 2008;152(4):494–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. STRM Lima 2013 da Silva Nalin de Souza B, França AKT, Filho NS, Sichieri R: Dietary approach to hypertension based on low glycaemic index and principles of DASH (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension): a randomised trial in a primary care service Br J Nutr 110 8 1472 1479

  61. Niiranen TJ, Leino K, Puukka P, Kantola I, Karanko H, Jula AM. Lack of impact of a comprehensive intervention on hypertension in the primary care setting. Am J Hypertens. 2014;27(3):489–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Filippini T, Violi F, D’Amico R, Vinceti M. The effect of potassium supplementation on blood pressure in hypertensive subjects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2017;230:127–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Campbell F, Blank L, Messina J, Day M, Buckley Woods H, Payne N, Goyder E, Armitage C. Physical activity: brief advice for adults in primary care (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Public Health Intervention Guidance). Sheffield: NICE Centre for Public Health Excellence; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Campbell F, Holmes M, Everson-Hock E, Davis S, Buckley Woods H, Anokye N, Tappenden P, Kaltenthaler E. A systematic review and economic evaluation of exercise referral schemes in primary care: a short report. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(60):1–110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Anokye NK, Lord J, Fox-Rushby J. Is brief advice in primary care a cost-effective way to promote physical activity? Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(3):202–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Douglas F, Torrance N, van Teijlingen E, Meloni S, Kerr A. Primary care staff’s views and experiences related to routinely advising patients about physical activity. a questionnaire survey. BMC Public Health. 2006;6(1):138.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Morgan F, Battersby A, Weightman AL, Searchfield L, Turley R, Morgan H, Jagroo J, Ellis S. Adherence to exercise referral schemes by participants – what do providers and commissioners need to know? a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):227.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Booth HP, Prevost TA, Wright AJ, Gulliford MC. Effectiveness of behavioural weight loss interventions delivered in a primary care setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fam Pract. 2014;31(6):643–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Parretti HM, Jebb SA, Johns DJ, Lewis AL, Christian-Brown AM, Aveyard P. Clinical effectiveness of very-low-energy diets in the management of weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2016;17(3):225–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Daumit GL, Janssen EM, Jerome GJ, Dalcin AT, Charleston J, Clark JM, Coughlin JW, Yeh HC, Miller ER, Durkin N, et al. Cost of behavioral weight loss programs implemented in clinical practice: the POWER trial at Johns Hopkins. Transl Behav Med. 2020;10(1):103–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kent S, Aveyard P, Astbury N, Mihaylova B, Jebb SA. Is doctor referral to a low-energy total diet replacement program cost-effective for the routine treatment of obesity? Obesity. 2019;27(3):391–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Gupta H. Barriers to and facilitators of long term weight loss maintenance in adult UK people: a thematic analysis. Int J Prev Med. 2014;5(12):1512–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Dewhurst A, Peters S, Devereux-Fitzgerald A, Hart J. Physicians’ views and experiences of discussing weight management within routine clinical consultations: a thematic synthesis. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(5):897–908.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Tham M, Young D. The role of the general practitioner in weight management in primary care–a cross sectional study in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;9:66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Park HE, Billups SJ, Schilling LM: Physician perceived barriers and solutions to DASH diet recommendations for hypertension prevention and management. 2020.

  76. Dash S, Delibasic V, Alsaeed S, Ward M, Jefferson K, Manca DP, Arcand J. Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours related to physician-delivered dietary advice for patients with hypertension. J Community Health. 2020;45(5):1067–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Trieu K, McMahon E, Santos JA, Bauman A, Jolly KA, Bolam B, Webster J. Review of behaviour change interventions to reduce population salt intake. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Hooper L, Bartlett C, Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S. Systematic review of long term effects of advice to reduce dietary salt in adults. BMJ. 2002;325(7365):628.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Ferrara AL, Pacioni D, Di Fronzo V, Russo BF, Staiano L, Speranza E, Gente R, Gargiulo F, Ferrara F. Lifestyle educational program strongly increases compliance to nonpharmacologic intervention in hypertensive patients: a 2-year follow-up study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012;14(11):767–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Lin PH, Yancy WS Jr, Pollak KI, Dolor RJ, Marcello J, Samsa GP, Batch BC, Svetkey LP. The influence of a physician and patient intervention program on dietary intake. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013;113(11):1465–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Yamasaki T, Sadanaga T, Hirota S. Effects of single-session dietary counseling by dieticians on salt reduction in cardiology outpatients who consumed large amounts of salt. Exp Ther Med. 2015;10(1):113–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Bhana N, Utter J, Eyles H. Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours related to dietary salt intake in high-income countries: a systematic review. Current Nutrition Reports. 2018;7(4):183–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Ireland DM, Clifton PM, Keogh JB. Achieving the salt intake target of 6 g/day in the current food supply in free-living adults using two dietary education strategies. J Am Diet Assoc. 2010;110(5):763–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Top 10 Sources of Sodium [https://www.cdc.gov/salt/sources.htm]

  85. Liem DG, Miremadi F, Zandstra EH, Keast RSJ. Health labelling can influence taste perception and use of table salt for reduced-sodium products. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15(12):2340–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. The SHAKE technical package for salt reduction [https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250135/9789241511346-eng.pdf]

  87. Cohn JN, Kowey PR, Whelton PK, Prisant LM. New guidelines for potassium replacement in clinical practice: a contemporary review by the national council on potassium in clinical practice. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(16):2429–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Filippini T, Naska A, Kasdagli MI, Torres D, Lopes C, Carvalho C, Moreira P, Malavolti M, Orsini N, Whelton PK, et al. Potassium intake and blood pressure: a dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(12):e015719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Sidhu K, Sanjanwala R, Zieroth S. Hyperkalemia in heart failure. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2020;35(2):150–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Greer RC, Marklund M, Anderson CAM, Cobb LK, Dalcin AT, Henry M, Appel LJ. Potassium-enriched salt substitutes as a means to lower blood pressure. Hypertension. 2020;75(2):266–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Neal B, Wu Y, Feng X, Zhang R, Zhang Y, Shi J, Zhang J, Tian M, Huang L, Li Z, et al. Effect of salt substitution on cardiovascular events and death. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(12):1067–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Lamming L, Pears S, Mason D, Morton K, Bijker M, Sutton S, Hardeman W. What do we know about brief interventions for physical activity that could be delivered in primary care consultations? a systematic review of reviews. Prev Med. 2017;99:152–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Morgan F, Turley RL, Morgan HE, Searchfield L, Weightman AL, Elliot E, Murphy S: Exercise referral schemes to promote physical activity: NICE; 2014.

  94. Pavey TG, Taylor AH, Fox KR, Hillsdon M, Anokye N, Campbell JL, Foster C, Green C, Moxham T, Mutrie N et al: Effect of exercise referral schemes in primary care on physical activity and improving health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj 2011, 343(nov04 2):d6462-d6462.

  95. Lion A, Vuillemin A, Thornton JS, Theisen D, Stranges S, Ward M. Physical activity promotion in primary care: a Utopian quest? Health Promot Int. 2019;34(4):877–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Eden KB, Orleans CT, Mulrow CD, Pender NJ, Teutsch SM. Does counseling by clinicians improve physical activity? a summary of the evidence for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(3):208–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Richards J, Hillsdon M, Thorogood M, Foster C: Face‐to‐face interventions for promoting physical activity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013(9).

  98. Sousa Junior AE, Macêdo GAD, Schwade D, Sócrates J, Alves JW, Farias-Junior LF, Freire YA, Lemos T, Browne RAV, Costa EC. Physical activity counseling for adults with hypertension: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(17):6076.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Lin JS, O'Connor EA, Evans CV, Senger CA, Rowland MG, Groom HC: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Syntheses, formerly Systematic Evidence Reviews. In: Behavioral Counseling to Promote a Healthy Lifestyle for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Persons With Cardiovascular Risk Factors: An Updated Systematic Evidence Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. edn. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014.

  100. Patrick K, Pratt M, Sallis RE: The Healthcare Sector's Role in the U.S. National Physical Activity Plan. Journal of physical activity & health 2009, 6(s2):S211-s219.

  101. Pool AC, Kraschnewski JL, Cover LA, Lehman EB, Stuckey HL, Hwang KO, Pollak KI, Sciamanna CN. The impact of physician weight discussion on weight loss in US adults. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2014;8(2):e131–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Wadden TA, Volger S, Tsai AG, Sarwer DB, Berkowitz RI, Diewald LK, Carvajal R, Moran CH, Vetter M. Group P-UR: Managing obesity in primary care practice: an overview with perspective from the POWER-UP study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37(Suppl 1):S3-11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Astbury NM, Aveyard P, Nickless A, Hood K, Corfield K, Lowe R, Jebb SA. Doctor referral of overweight people to low energy total diet replacement treatment (DROPLET): pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2018;362:k3760.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Tsai AG, Wadden TA. The evolution of very-low-calorie diets: an update and meta-analysis. Obesity. 2006;14(8):1283–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Semlitsch T, Jeitler K, Berghold A, Horvath K, Posch N, Poggenburg S, Siebenhofer A. Long-term effects of weight-reducing diets in people with hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;3(3):CD008274.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Gulsin GS, Swarbrick DJ, Athithan L, Brady EM, Henson J, Baldry E, Argyridou S, Jaicim NB, Squire G, Walters Y, et al. Effects of low-energy diet or exercise on cardiovascular function in working-age adults with type 2 Diabetes: a prospective, randomized, open-label. Blinded End Point Trial Diabetes Care. 2020;43(6):1300–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Brown A, Leeds AR. Very low-energy and low-energy formula diets: effects on weight loss, obesity co-morbidities and type 2 diabetes remission – an update on the evidence for their use in clinical practice. Nutr Bull. 2019;44(1):7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Wadden TA, Butryn ML, Hong PS, Tsai AG. Behavioral treatment of obesity in patients encountered in primary care settings: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;312(17):1779–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Gay HC, Rao SG, Vaccarino V, Ali MK. Effects of different dietary interventions on blood pressure. Hypertension. 2016;67(4):733–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Kolasa KM. Dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) in clinical practice: a primary care experience. Clin Cardiol. 1999;22(S3):16–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Blumenthal JA, Babyak MA, Hinderliter A, Watkins LL, Craighead L, Lin P-H, Caccia C, Johnson J, Waugh R, Sherwood A. Effects of the DASH diet alone and in combination with exercise and weight loss on blood pressure and cardiovascular biomarkers in men and women with high blood pressure: the ENCORE study. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(2):126–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Lin P-H, Appel LJ, Funk K, Craddick S, Chen C, Elmer P, McBurnie MA, Champagne C. The PREMIER intervention helps participants follow the dietary approaches to stop hypertension dietary pattern and the current dietary reference intakes recommendations. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107(9):1541–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Wong MCS, Wang HHX, Kwan MWM, Fong BCY, Chan WM, Zhang DX, Li STS, Yan BP, Coats AJS, Griffiths SM. Dietary counselling has no effect on cardiovascular risk factors among Chinese Grade 1 hypertensive patients: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(38):2598–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Kim H, Andrade FCD. Diagnostic status of hypertension on the adherence to the dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) diet. Prev Med Rep. 2016;4:525–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. R Mahdavi 2017 Bagheri asl A, Abadi MAJ, Namazi N: Perceived Barriers to Following Dietary Recommendations in Hypertensive Patients J Am Coll Nutr 36 3 193 199

  116. Conversano C, Orrù G, Pozza A, Miccoli M, Ciacchini R, Marchi L, Gemignani A. Is mindfulness-based stress reduction effective for people with hypertension? a systematic review and meta-analysis of 30 years of evidence. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(6):2882.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Xie C, Cui L, Zhu J, Wang K, Sun N, Sun C. Coffee consumption and risk of hypertension: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Hum Hypertens. 2018;32(2):83–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Mahdavi-Roshan M, Salari A, Ghorbani Z, Ashouri A. The effects of regular consumption of green or black tea beverage on blood pressure in those with elevated blood pressure or hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2020;51:102430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Wolff M, Sundquist K, Lonn SL, Midlov P. Impact of yoga on blood pressure and quality of life in patients with hypertension - a controlled trial in primary care, matched for systolic blood pressure. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013;13:111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Wolff M, Rogers K, Erdal B, Chalmers JP, Sundquist K, Midlov P. Impact of a short home-based yoga programme on blood pressure in patients with hypertension: a randomized controlled trial in primary care. J Hum Hypertens. 2016;30(10):599–605.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Dhungana RR, Pedisic Z, Joshi S, Khanal MK, Kalauni OP, Shakya A, Bhurtel V, Panthi S, Ramesh Kumar KC, Ghimire B, et al. Effects of a health worker-led 3-month yoga intervention on blood pressure of hypertensive patients: a randomised controlled multicentre trial in the primary care setting. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):550.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Momeni J, Omidi A, Raygan F, Akbari H. The effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on cardiac patients’ blood pressure, perceived stress, and anger: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016;10(10):763–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Demarzo MMP, Montero-Marin J, Cuijpers P, Zabaleta-del-Olmo E, Mahtani KR, Vellinga A, Vicens C, López-del-Hoyo Y, García-Campayo J. The efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions in primary care: a meta-analytic review. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13(6):573.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  124. PHR Santiago 2019 Valle Serra e Meira LR, Colussi CF: Feasibility evaluation of a mindfulness-based stress reduction program for primary care professionals in Brazilian national health system Complement Ther Clin Pract 35 8 17

Download references

Acknowledgements

The article processing fee was covered by Victoria University.

Funding

The authors received no specific grant from any funding agency for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia

    Raja Ram Dhungana, Zeljko Pedisic & Maximilian de Courten

  2. Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

    Raja Ram Dhungana

Authors
  1. Raja Ram Dhungana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zeljko Pedisic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maximilian de Courten
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RRD and ZP conceptualised the study. RRD interpreted the findings and prepared the first draft. MdC and ZP interpreted the findings, revised the draft and contributed to writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raja Ram Dhungana.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dhungana, R.R., Pedisic, Z. & de Courten, M. Implementation of non-pharmacological interventions for the treatment of hypertension in primary care: a narrative review of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, barriers, and facilitators. BMC Prim. Care 23, 298 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01884-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01884-8

Keywords

BMC Primary Care

ISSN: 2731-4553

Contact us