Skip to main content
Download PDF

The work-life balance of general practitioners as a predictor of burnout and motivation to stay in the profession

BMC Primary Care volume 23, Article number: 218 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Work-life balance (WLB) is associated with a variety of health-related outcomes in the general population. Since General Practitioners (GPs) play a fundamental role in the health system, we wanted to analyze the associations between their WLB and burnout scores as well as motivation to stay in the profession.

Methods

In September 2019, physicians from various specialties answered a comprehensive questionnaire. We analyzed a subsample of 188 GPs that were working full time, 61.7% were female.

Results

Multivariate analysis showed a beneficial association between WLB and all three dimensions of burnout (Emotional Exhaustion, Cynicism, and Professional Efficacy) as well as the motivation to stay in the profession.

Conclusions

Improving GPs WLB could be a way to reduce physician burnout, strengthen the healthcare system, and attract a new generation of talented physicians.

Peer Review reports

Background

Research shows that work life balance is positively associated with wellbeing as well as job and life satisfaction, and negatively with anxiety, depression and mental health problems [1,2,3]. Although research interest in physician work life balance (WLB) had been growing over the last decade [4,5,6], the connection between WLB and physician burnout is rarely addressed [7, 8]. However, studies with participants working in healthcare, banking, insurance, and logistics [9, 10], and with orthopedic trainees [11] implicate a connection between WLB and burnout. Burnout is characterized by (a) feelings of exhaustion or energy depletion; (b) increased mental distance from one’s job, or job-related feelings of negativism or cynicism; (c) a reduction in professional efficacy [12]. It is often understood as a three-dimensional construct including exhaustion, cynicism and (reduced) professional efficacy [13]. Due to their prominent role in the health system, general practitioners` (GPs) mental health has implications for themselves as well as for their patients. Research shows that burnout is not only connected to lower career satisfaction and increased depressiveness and hopelessness in physicians [14,15,16], but also to reduced professional work effort, quality of care, and an increased risk of medical errors [17,18,19]. With the diverse and severe implications of physician burnout, it is important to better understand its connection with WLB. Hence, in our study we want to contribute to the research by analyzing the connection between WLB and burnout as well as the motivation to stay in the profession in a sample of German GPs.

Materials and methods

Study design and sample

In September 2019, 1412 physicians working in the Federal State of Saxony, a region in the Eastern part of Germany, filled out a questionnaire on work strain, health, and work satisfaction. Physicians in the original sample came from a variety of different specialties including internal medicine, surgery, neurology, and prevention. The sample was already used to analyze burnout and WLB in specific groups of physicians, i.e., specialists in internal medicine and physicians with a migration background [20, 21]. For our analysis, we utilized a subsample consisting of all GPs working full time. After removing 39 participants due to missing values, the final sample contained 188 GPs. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the university, and participants have given consent for their data to be used in the research.

Assessment

We assessed a variety of sociodemographic data that comprised age, gender, marital status, place of residence, and children living in the household as well as number of working hours.

Burnout

We used the German version of the Maslach Burnout lnventory - General Survey (MBI-GS, [13, 22] which consists of the three dimensions Exhaustion, Cynicism, and Professional Efficacy. After Professional Efficacy had been inverted, weighted average scores of all three scales were added and categorized following the approach by Kalimo et al. [23]. While in theory the aggregated burnout score could range from 0 (= never) to 6 (= every day), participants in our sample scored between 0 and 4.

Work-life balance

We assessed global, subjective WLB with the German Trierer Kurzskala (TKS-WLB, 24). It consists of five statements that can be answered on a Likert-scale from 1 (= absolutely not true) to 6 (= absolutely correct). Typical items are “I am happy with my balance between work and private life” and “It is hard for me to reconcile work and private life”, and higher scores indicate a better WLB. The scale provides good psychometric properties [24].

Statistical analyses

SPSS Version 25 was used for the statistical analyses. We used multiple linear regressions to analyze the effects of WLB on burnout and motivation to stay in the profession. We controlled for place of residence and children in the household since both variables showed an association in our previous analyses.

Results

Descriptive characteristics

Our sample contained 188 individuals of which 61.7% were female. Table 1 shows the general characteristics of the study population.

Table 1 General characteristics of the study population
Full size table

Prediction of burnout and motivation to stay in the profession

WLB exhibited a negative effect on Exhaustion, and Cynicism, and a positive effect on Professional Efficacy and Motivation to stay in the Profession. There was a negative effect of children in the household on Exhaustion and of residing in a rural place on Cynicism, while female gender exhibited a positive effect on Professional Efficacy. Results of the regression analysis can be found in Table 2.

Table 2 Prediction of burnout and motivation to stay in the profession by work-life balance (N = 188)
Full size table

Discussion

Our results showed that there was a beneficial association between WLB and all dimensions of burnout as well as physicians` motivation to stay in the profession.

The average WLB in our sample was similar to the WLB found in highly demanding IT jobs and for teachers, and below the scores for managers in small and mid-sized companies [24, 25].

The fact that WLB was connected to burnout matches with results from other professions like banking and insurance [9, 10], and the fact that WLB was significantly associated with all three dimensions of burnout suggests that this connection is broad and also meaningful in practice. In addition, our results are in line with other studies that show connections between working overtime, long shifts, and burnout in medical professionals [26,27,28]. If future research strengthens a causal interpretation from WLB to burnout, WLB could be an avenue for improving GP mental health. Hence, measures that support GPs with administrative, legal and bureaucratic tasks as well as working fewer hours could help mitigate burnout risk. Beyond benefitting GPs and their patients, this could also help to reduce costs in the healthcare system that are caused by physician turnover and reduced working hours due to physician burnout [29].

Our results showed a positive connection between GPs` WLB and their motivation to stay in the profession, which matches with similar results in nurses and academics [30, 31]. In addition, research on health professionals connect better WLB to a reduced intention to leave the job [32, 33]. Studies also show that WLB is linked to a variety of other beneficial outcomes like affective commitment and job satisfaction [34, 35], and that organizations with a culture that values WLB could also benefit in terms of teamwork and safety [36]. Based on their analysis of the literature, Deery and Jago [37] suggest that WLB has become a key factor for employee management and retention, and a comparison of different generations across five countries implicates that the importance of WLB for attracting and retaining future talent may even increase due to changes in work-related values in younger individuals [38]. In that way, addressing GPs WLB is not only about GPs and patients, it is also a way to attract a new generation of talented physicians and to maintain and improve the healthcare system.

Limitations

While our study has several advantages, e.g., being the first of its kind utilizing a sample of German GPs, it has also certain limitations. For example, we did not assess the number of years a physician spent at their workplace which may have an impact on WLB. In addition, future research may benefit from assessing interactions between WLB and burnout with a longitudinal design.

Conclusions

The WLB of GPs is associated with burnout scores as well as with their motivation to stay in the profession. Therefore, interventions that improve WLB could be a way to not only improve GPs` mental health but also to strengthen and maintain the healthcare system and to attract a new generation of talented physicians.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset used and analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Haar JM, Russo M, Suñe A, Ollier-Malaterre A. Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: a study across seven cultures. J Vocat Behav. 2014;85(3):361–73 [cited 2019 Oct 28].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoffmann-Burdzińska K, Rutkowska M. Work life balance as a factor influencing well-being. J Positive Manage. 2015;6(4):87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kotera Y, Green P, Sheffield D. Work-life balance of UK construction workers: relationship with mental health. Constr Manag Econ. 2020;38(3):291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shanafelt TD, Gorringe G, Menaker R, Storz KA, Reeves D, Buskirk SJ, et al. Impact of organizational leadership on physician burnout and satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(4):432–40 Available from: URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025619615000713.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Starmer AJ, Frintner MP, Freed GL. Work–life balance, burnout, and satisfaction of early career pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2016;137(4):e20153183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Malhotra J, Wong E, Thind A. Canadian family physician job satisfaction - is it changing in an evolving practice environment? An analysis of the 2013 National Physician Survey database. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):100. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0786-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Umene-Nakano W, Kato TA, Kikuchi S, Tateno M, Fujisawa D, Hoshuyama T, et al. Nationwide survey of work environment, work-life balance and burnout among psychiatrists in Japan. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55189 Available from: URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23418435.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Rabatin J, Williams E, Baier Manwell L, Schwartz MD, Brown RL, Linzer M. Predictors and outcomes of burnout in primary care physicians. J Prim Care Community Health. 2015;7(1):41–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Brauchli R, Bauer GF, Hämmig O. Relationship between time-based work-life conflict and burnout. Swiss J Psychol. 2011;70(3):165–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwartz SP, Adair KC, Bae J, Rehder KJ, Shanafelt TD, Profit J, et al. Work-life balance behaviours cluster in work settings and relate to burnout and safety culture: a cross-sectional survey analysis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28(2):142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Arora M, Diwan AD, Harris IA. Prevalence and factors of burnout among Australian Orthopaedic trainees: a cross-sectional study. J Orthop Surg. 2014;22(3):374–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization. International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics (11th revision); 2018. Available from: URL: https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP, Maslach C, Jackson SE. MBI-general survey (MBI-GS). Palo Alto: Mindgarden; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Govardhan LM, Pinelli V, Schnatz PF. Burnout, depression and job satisfaction in obstetrics and gynecology residents. Conn Med. 2012;76(7):389–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Bechamps GJ, Russell T, Dyrbye L, Satele D, et al. Burnout and career satisfaction among American surgeons. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):463–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pompili M, Innamorati M, Narciso V, Kotzalidis GD, Dominici G, Talamo A, et al. Burnout, hopelessness and suicide risk in medical doctors. Clin Ter. 2010;161(6):511–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Klein J, Grosse Frie K, Blum K, dem Knesebeck O, von. Burnout and perceived quality of care among German clinicians in surgery. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22(6):525–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shanafelt TD, Mungo M, Schmitgen J, Storz KA, Reeves D, Hayes SN, et al. Longitudinal study evaluating the association between physician burnout and changes in professional work effort. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(4):422–31 Available from: URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025619616001014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tawfik DS, Profit J, Morgenthaler TI, Satele DV, Sinsky CA, Dyrbye LN, et al. Physician burnout, well-being, and work unit safety grades in relationship to reported medical errors. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018;93(11):1571–80 Available from: URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025619618303720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hussenoeder FS, Bodendieck E, Conrad I, Jung F, Riedel-Heller SG. Burnout and work-life balance among physicians: the role of migration background. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021;16(1):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hussenoeder FS, Bodendieck E, Jung F, Conrad I, Riedel-Heller SG. Comparing burnout and work-life balance among specialists in internal medicine: the role of inpatient vs. outpatient workplace. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021;16(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00294-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. Burnout inventory manual. Palo Alto: Consulting; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kalimo R, Pahkin K, Mutanen P, Topipinen-Tanner S. Staying well or burning out at work: work characteristics and personal resources as long-term predictors. Work Stress. 2003;17(2):109–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Syrek C, Bauer-Emmel C, Antoni C, Klusemann J. Entwicklung und Validierung der Trierer Kurzskala zur Messung von work-life balance (TKS-WLB). Diagnostica. 2011;57(3):134–45 [Cited 2019 Feb 7].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Syrek CJ, Apostel E, Antoni CH. Stress in highly demanding IT jobs: transformational leadership moderates the impact of time pressure on exhaustion and work–life balance. J Occup Health Psychol. 2013;18(3):252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Luther L, Gearhart T, Fukui S, Morse G, Rollins AL, Salyers MP. Working overtime in community mental health: associations with clinician burnout and perceived quality of care. Psychiatric Rehabil J. 2017;(1559–3126(Electronic),1095-158X(Print)):252–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stimpfel AW, Sloane DM, Aiken LH. The longer the shifts for hospital nurses, the higher the levels of burnout and patient dissatisfaction. Health Aff. 2012;31(11):2501–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. De Fuente C, Arturo G, Albendín-García L, de la Fuente EI, San Luis C, Gómez-Urquiza JL, et al. Burnout in nursing professionals performing overtime workdays in emergency and critical care departments. Spain. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2016;90:e1–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Han S, Shanafelt TD, Sinsky CA, Awad KM, Dyrbye LN, Fiscus LC, et al. Estimating the attributable cost of physician burnout in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(11):784–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lindfelt T, Ip EJ, Gomez A, Barnett MJ. The impact of work-life balance on intention to stay in academia: results from a national survey of pharmacy faculty. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2018;14(4):387–90 Available from: URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741117300049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Loft MI, Jensen CS. What makes experienced nurses stay in their position? A qualitative interview study. J Nurs Manag. 2020;28(6):1305–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Matsuo M, Suzuki E, Takayama Y. Factors related to hospital nurse intention to leave: does striving for work-life balance and sense of coherence affect wishes to stay in the organization? GSTF J Nurs Health Care (JNHC). 2020;4(1).

  33. Hämmig O. Explaining burnout and the intention to leave the profession among health professionals – a cross-sectional study in a hospital setting in Switzerland. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):785. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3556-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim HK. Work-life balance and Employees’ performance: the mediating role of affective commitment. Glob Bus Manag Res. 2014;6(1):37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mas-Machuca M, Berbegal-Mirabent J, Alegre I. Work-life balance and its relationship with organizational pride and job satisfaction. J Manag Psychol. 2016;31(2):586–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sexton JB, Schwartz SP, Chadwick WA, Rehder KJ, Bae J, Bokovoy J, et al. The associations between work–life balance behaviours, teamwork climate and safety climate: cross-sectional survey introducing the work–life climate scale, psychometric properties, benchmarking data and future directions. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(8):632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Deery M, Jago L. Revisiting talent management, work-life balance and retention strategies. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2015;27(3):453–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cogin J. Are generational differences in work values fact or fiction? Multi-country evidence and implications. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2012;23(11):2268–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the State Chamber of Physicians of Saxony and the University of Leipzig.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This paper was supported by the State Chamber of Physicians of Saxony and the University of Leipzig. Funding did not affect the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and the writing of the manuscript. We acknowledge support from Leipzig University for Open Access Publishing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. General Practice, Dresdener Str. 34a, 04808, Wurzen, Germany

    Erik Bodendieck

  2. Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health, University of Leipzig, Ph.-Rosenthal-Str. 55, 04103, Leipzig, Germany

    Franziska U. Jung, Ines Conrad, Steffi G. Riedel-Heller & Felix S. Hussenoeder

Authors
  1. Erik Bodendieck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Franziska U. Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ines Conrad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Steffi G. Riedel-Heller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Felix S. Hussenoeder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FSH and IC designed the study, analyzed data, interpreted results, and drafted the manuscript. SGRH contributed to study design, the interpretation of results, and to manuscript revision. EB and FJ contributed to data collection, study organization, and the revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix S. Hussenoeder.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Leipzig (reference number: 196/19-ek). Participants have given informed consent for their data to be used in the research. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bodendieck, E., Jung, F.U., Conrad, I. et al. The work-life balance of general practitioners as a predictor of burnout and motivation to stay in the profession. BMC Prim. Care 23, 218 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01831-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01831-7

Keywords

BMC Primary Care

ISSN: 2731-4553

Contact us