Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The developing family doctor system: evidence from the progress of the family doctor signing service from a longitudinal survey (2013–2016) in Pudong New Area, Shanghai

BMC Family Practice volume 22, Article number: 11 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The family doctor system is a vital part of China’s national medical and health system reform. Evidence of the degree of implementation of the family doctor system is required to assist managers and policy makers in Pudong with resource allocation planning. This study analyzed changes in indicators (family doctor team construction, contracted medical services, health management services and so on) over time to evaluate the progress of the family doctor system in Pudong.

Methods

We used a cross-sectional design with an online questionnaire survey to collect 3-year (2013–2016) consecutive data. The online questionnaires were completed by the doctors responsible for information reporting in each community health service center of Pudong. The data were sorted, and the indices calculated and analyzed using descriptive statistics and statistical tests.

Results

The proportion of registered general practitioners increased each year, from 50.8% in 2013 to 66.5% in 2016; this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.000). The number of family doctors per 10,000 permanent residents rose each year, from 1.7 in 2013 to 2.1 in 2016. The rate of contracted household residents was 55.7% in 2013 and increased to 71.7% in 2016, with the difference being significant in different years (P = 0.012). Analysis of referral services showed the people times of contracted residents transferring to higher-level hospitals from family doctors increased each year, from 172,734 in 2013 to 341,615 in 2016; differences among different regions were statistically significant for 2013–2016. The rate of health screening for contracted residents also increased each year, with statistically significant differences in different years (P = 0.000). The rate of health assessment interventions for contracted residents rose each year, with statistically significant differences in different years (P = 0.003).

Conclusions

The family doctor signing service in Pudong made headway in general practitioner availability, contract service rate of household residents, and providing health management services. However, problems included family doctor shortages and limited supporting policies, especially in rural and suburban areas compared with urban divisions. Increasing the enrollment rate of family doctors and speeding up the implementation of “contract service fees” are key tasks for the sustainable development of the family doctor system in Pudong.

Peer Review reports

Background

Changes in medical modes and population aging resulted in a “blowout” of chronic diseases. The long-term survival of patients with chronic diseases requires good treatment, continuity of services, comprehensive community interventions, and personalized services. Furthermore, with the increasingly specialized and refined development of medical technology, a mismatch emerged between “high health demand” and “high service technology.” In reality, many patients experience difficulty finding corresponding medical service technology, meaning many cases require emergency treatment.

In China, promoting family doctor contracting services was a key breakthrough in implementing a graded diagnosis and treatment system. Through the family doctor contract service system, family doctors provide comprehensive services to help patients who lack professional knowledge to improve their ability to appropriately choose medical institutions and obtain long-term coordinated healthcare. To date, over 50 countries and regions have implemented a family doctor system, including the United Kingdom, Cuba, Australia, the United States, and Canada [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Although the healthcare systems, service modes, and operation mechanisms of family doctor systems differ in different countries, the family doctor system occupies an important position in medical and health service systems. There are also some common practices and characteristics across family doctor systems. For example, the Danish General Practitioners Association [7] began to sign healthcare contracts with residents in 1973 and in Holland, residents must choose a general practitioner for signing each year [8]. There is a clear indication of the number of residents that family doctors should sign with, which is set at about 2000 people.

Development of the family doctor system in Shanghai began in 2003, with pilot work for service mode conversion implemented in Jing’an District, Changning District, Huangpu District, Pudong New Area, and Zhabei District. The public has reached a certain understanding of family doctors, and various highlights and experiences have been reported [9,10,11,12]. Pudong implemented the family doctor system in 2010, and has focused on perfecting the management system, working mechanism innovations, optimizing service patterns and content, and promoting community health reform in general.

However, problems have been identified that require resolution, such as an inadequate contract service rate, family doctor shortages, and the absence of supporting policies [13,14,15]. This study aimed to investigate the degree of implementation of the family doctor system in Pudong based on several key indicators: general practitioner/family doctor team construction, medical service coverage and contracting, service provision status, and health management services. It is important to clarify barriers to strengthening the family doctor system to provide reference information for related health policy.

Methods

Study design

This study used a cross-sectional design, with data collected via an online questionnaire survey.

Respondents

In total, 45 community health service centers (CHSCs) in Pudong New Area of China were included in our survey. Based on economic development level and geographical region, we classified CHSCs into urban divisions, suburban districts, and rural areas.

Data collection

Quantitative data statistics were obtained from the online questionnaire used in the “Pudong New Area Family Doctors Annual Report” for CHSCs. Some data were obtained by searching the CNKI, SCIE, and VIPIN databases, Elsevier, and governmental statistics reports, setting “family doctor system” as the search term. These data included reviews, empirical studies, and proceedings, and were used in designing the questionnaire. At first, 60 indices were selected in the questionnaire, then according to expert consultation and pre-investigation experiment, 54 indices were formed. Finally, the questionnaire covered six parts: service coverage, staff, providing contract status, providing medical services, providing health management services, and providing other services with 54 indices (see Questionnaire in the additional file). The online questionnaires were completed by the doctors who were responsible for information reporting in each CHSC. Moreover, all data were reviewed by the director of each CHSC. The response rate of the survey was 100%, and investigation data concerning family doctor services for 45 CHSCs were included in this analysis. We analyzed consecutive data for 3 years (2013–2016). These data were sorted and the significance of each index was analyzed. The specific definitions for each index in this study were as follows.

  • Proportion of registered general practitioners (%) = number of registered general practitioners / number of clinical (assistant) physicians.

  • The proportion of nurses (%) = number of nurses included in the family doctor team / number of nurses in the community.

  • Doctor to nurse ratio (%) = number of clinical (assistant) physicians / number of nurses in the community.

  • Village physicians ratio (%) = number of village physicians included in the family doctor team / number of clinical (assistant) physicians.

  • Family doctors per 10,000 permanent residents (N/10,000) = number of family doctors / number of permanent residents in the community / 10,000.

  • Coverage of community health service stations (%) = number of community health service stations providing family doctor services / number of community health service stations.

  • Coverage of the proportion of village clinics (%) = number of village clinics providing family doctor services / number of village clinics.

  • Rate of contracted permanent residents (%) = number of permanent residents signing services / number of permanent residents.

  • Rate of contracted household residents (%) = number of household residents signing services / number of household residents.

  • Rate of contracted resident families (%) = number of permanent families signing services / number of permanent families.

  • Proportion of contracted residents’ visits in total outpatient visits per year (%) = number of residents signing services who visited the community / number of residents signing services.

  • Outpatient appointment rate per year (%) = number of appointments for outpatients (persons) / number of outpatients in the community health service center during the year.

  • Rate of contracted residents establishing profile (%) = number of contracted residents’ electronic health records / number of contract residents.

  • Ratio of health records dynamic updates (%) = number of contracted residents’ electronic health records updates / number of contracted residents’ electronic health records.

  • Rate of contracted residents’ health screening (%) = number of contracted residents who conducted health screening / number of contract residents.

  • Rate of contracted residents’ health assessment interventions (%) = number of contract residents who received targeted intervention guidance programs / number of contracted residents who received health status and health needs assessment services.

Statistical analyses

Data were analyzed using SPSS version 18.0. Descriptive statistics were calculated for CHSC characteristics, and a scoring ratio (%) was used to explain the situation of the family doctor system implementation. Chi-square tests were used to examine comparisons of the variables between groups, and the threshold of statistical significance (α) was set at P < 0.05 (two-tailed). Pairwise comparisons of multiple sample rates were performed: α’ = α/[k*(k-1)/2 + 1]. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test was used to assess the impact of time trends.

Results

Characteristics of CHSCs

There are 45 CHSCs in Pudong New Area, including 13 urban divisions, 8 suburban districts, and 24 rural areas. In 2013 and 2014, 42 centers met the standards for community standardization, but all 45 centers had reached this standard since 2015. The number of certified general practitioner training bases increased from 4 in 2013 to 8 in 2016. Since 2014, all CHSCs were designated as medical insurance agencies. Some centers had achieved zero difference sales of essential drugs, which increased to 13 centers in 2016 (see Table 1).

Table 1 Sociological characteristic of CHSCs in Pudong from 2013 to 2016
Full size table

Family doctor team construction

The proportion of registered general practitioners in family doctor teams increased each year, from 50.8% in 2013 to 66.5% in 2016, with the differences being statistically significant (P = 0.000). The proportion of nurses in family doctor teams also increased each year, from 40.2% in 2013 to 46.1% in 2016; however, this difference was not significant (P = 0.861), although different regions showed differences for 2016 (P = 0.049). The doctor to nurse ratio changed from 1.4 in 2013 to 1.2 in 2016, but no statistically significant difference was found in different years (P = 0.120). The ratio of village physicians in the team decreased each year, whereas the number of family doctors per 10,000 permanent residents increased each year (from 1.7 in 2013 to 2.1 in 2016) (see Table 2).

Table 2 Family doctor staff and team construction
Full size table

Family doctor system coverage and contract

The proportion of CHSCs covered by the family doctor system increased each year, from 97.2% in 2013 to 100.0% in 2016. Since 2014, village clinics achieved full coverage of the family doctor system. The contract rate of permanent residents increased each year (39.1% in 2013 and 45.9% in 2016), but the difference was not significant in different years (P = 0.130). The contract rate for household residents was 55.7% in 2013 and rose to 71.7% in 2016, with the difference being statistically significant in different years (P = 0.012); there were also statistically significant differences among different regions in 2013, 2014, and 2015 (P = 0.002, P = 0.006, and P = 0.001, respectively). The contract rate of resident families also increased each year; the differences were significant among different regions, but were not significant in different years (see Table 3).

Table 3 Family doctor system coverage and contract situation
Full size table

Family doctors offering contracted medical services

The proportion of contracted resident visits in all outpatient visits was 37.4% in 2013 and 40.5% in 2016, but the difference was not statistically significant. The outpatient appointment rate per year was low, with that in rural areas being higher compared with urban divisions and suburban districts, although the difference was not statistically significant each year. The number of contracted resident visits to family doctors per year showed a downward trend, with the trend being more notable in the urban division compared with suburban districts and rural areas; the differences among regions were statistically significant in 2013, 2014, and 2015. The people times of referrals to higher level hospitals through family doctors per year increased each year. However, there were more referrals in rural areas than in suburban districts and urban divisions, and these differences were statistically significant in different years. Referrals from higher level hospitals through family doctors per year in suburban districts were higher compared with the urban divisions and rural areas in 2013 and 2014, with these differences being statistically significant (P = 0.000 and P = 0.001, respectively) (see Table 4).

Table 4 Family doctor providing medical service among contract residents
Full size table

Family doctors offering health management services

The rate of contracted residents establishing a profile was 55.7% in 2013 and increased to 96.8% in 2016. The ratio of health record dynamic updates decreased each year, but the difference was not statistically significant. The rate of health screening for contracted residents increased each year, and the differences were statistically significant in different years (P = 0.000). Finally, the rate of health assessment interventions for contracted residents increased each year, and these differences were statistically significant in different years (P = 0.003) (see Table 5).

Table 5 Family doctor health management service
Full size table

Discussion

In China, the basic policy for the family doctor system is to be the community’s first diagnosis system. International and domestic practice showed that promoting family doctor signing services in primary medical and healthcare institutions offered a feasible way to protect and maintain public health [16,17,18,19,20]. This method is conducive to changing the model of medical and health services and allows family doctors to act as health gatekeepers. Since the State Council issued the Guiding Opinions on Establishing a General Practitioner System in 2011, pilots of different forms of family doctor signing services have been launched in various places, including team building, incentives, and evaluations [21,22,23,24,25,26]. As early as November 2010, Pudong established the family doctor system, and since April 2012 all CHSCs in Pudong have comprehensively implemented the system. However, some issues emerged with the system implementation, such as who should provide family doctor signing services. The professionals engaged in family doctor services differ slightly across various countries, but the qualification is strictly regulated. For example, in the United Kingdom, family doctors need to complete medical professional training (including in all departments of hospital rotation training), and physicians registered with the Royal Society of Medicine are comprehensive primary healthcare personnel with clinical skills [27, 28]. In the United States, general practitioners must first demonstrate good learning achievement and medical college clinical assessment, participate in the national unified standard exam, and then complete an interview that covers issues such as personal vision to determine whether their life and value outlooks are suited to general practice [29, 30].

This study showed that family doctors in Pudong were the persons with first responsibility for providing contracted health services to the public. Family doctors were mainly registered general practitioners (including assistant general practitioners and traditional Chinese medicine general practitioners), as well as some village doctors who were deemed capable. With the development of family doctor teams, contracted service teams based around general practitioners were gradually formed, which mainly included family doctors, community nurses, public health physicians (assistant public health physicians), and village doctors. In this study, the proportion of registered general practitioners in these teams was 50.8% in 2013, but rose to 66.5% in 2016. Furthermore, with the “National Comprehensive Reform Pilot Area for the Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine,” Pudong introduced traditional Chinese medicine physicians into family doctor teams to provide special traditional Chinese medicine services. Our study found there were 236 traditional Chinese medicine physicians working as family doctors, which accounted for 19.4% of family doctor teams by the end of 2017. In addition, non-medical community assistants and community volunteers were also recruited to join the teams. In these teams, family doctors are responsible for task distribution and management of team members, and work closely with other specialists and medical technicians to provide high-quality services to contracted residents.

The present study showed that the proportion of registered general practitioners in the family doctor teams increased each year, from 50.8% in 2013 to 66.5% in 2016. Pudong had 2.1 general practitioners per 10,000 permanent residents in 2016; however, the target of the “13th Five-Year Plan for the Reform and Development of Health and Family Planning in Shanghai” is set at 4–5 general practitioners per 10,000 permanent residents. Given the current population of 5.50 million permanent residents in Pudong, at least 1045 more general practitioners are needed to achieve full population coverage. In 2014, Pudong issued “interim measures on further strengthening the construction of rural health talent team” (referred to as “eight health polices”) for rural and suburban personnel in CHSCs [31]. General practitioners in CHSCs in rural areas and suburban districts received 2000–6000 RMB/month as a work allowance, which increased work enthusiasm. However, the effect of the incentive policy may take some time to appear, and as the permanent population of Pudong is increasing each year, family doctor signing services continue to face the problem of a shortage of general practitioners.

Family doctors are the main body providing contracted services, and this study raised questions as to what form services would take and how residents sign contracts with family doctors in Pudong. Our investigation showed that residents or families can voluntarily choose one family doctor team with which to sign a service agreement. The service period for each contract is 1 year in principle. In this study, the rate of contracted permanent residents was 39.1% in 2013 and rose to 45.9% in 2016 (no statistically significant difference), whereas the rate of contracted household residents increased each year, reaching 71.7% in 2016 (significant difference from 2013 to 2016). At the same time, we found the rate of contracted household residents in suburban districts was higher than that in urban divisions and rural areas. However, the rate of contracted household residents rapidly increased. A potential reason for this observation is the relative shortage of medical resources in rural and suburban areas, which made it easier to implement the family doctor system. In addition, the stimulus policy for general practitioners (“eight health polices”) in the rural areas of Pudong took effect. Moreover, Since 2014, the “1 + 1 + 1” medical institution combination contract (a community health service center, a district-level hospital, and a municipal-level hospital) has been explored in Shanghai; therefore, when signing with a family doctor team in the community, people or families can also be recommended to a secondary or tertiary hospital for treatment in the combination medical institutions [32, 33]. This means family doctors not only provide basic health services, but also provide other services such as appointment services, two-way referral services, health counseling and education, and door-to-door services. This means family doctors have a heavy workload, which makes it difficult to guarantee service quality in Pudong. The National Health Commission and the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine jointly issued “Guiding Opinions on Regulating the Management of Family Doctor Contracting Services” in 2018. This document proposed that the number of residents signed to each family doctor should not exceed 2000 in principle. However, we found significant regional differences in the number of two-way referrals by family doctors per year in Pudong. There were more referrals in rural areas than in suburban districts and urban divisions, which reflected the large demand for medical services in remote areas. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt a regionally differentiated family doctor system promotion model.

Strengths and limitations

The study includes all community health service centers in Pudong New Area, and the sample is representative. The data used in this study were collected directly through online reporting, which avoided some information bias caused by manual completion and on-site answers, but all data were completed and reported by CHSC information staff, so the selective information bias might have occurred. Thence in the next study, to get more objective and accurate data, the relevant information for family doctors in each CHSC can be directly retrieved through the medical data information platform after obtaining the information collection authority.

Conclusions

The family doctor signing service in Pudong made headway in registered general practitioner availability, the contract service rate of household residents, and providing health management services. However, we identified problems in terms of a shortage of family doctors and limited supporting policies, especially in rural and suburban areas compared with urban divisions. Therefore, to ensure the sustainable development of the family doctor system, a series of “get in, stay, and do well” tasks need to be continued. The enrollment of family doctors must be increased, and strategies such as providing apartments, children’s education, and one-time incentives to attract and retain family doctors may be needed. Speeding up the implementation of “contract service fees” may also improve the enthusiasm of family doctors to extend signing services and reflect rewarding work and rewards.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CHSCs:

Community health service centers.

References

  1. Pertusa-Martínez S. General Practitioners at the court of Queen Elizabeth II of England. Experience of a Spanish family doctor in the United Kingdom. Atencion primaria. 2006;37:178–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Reyes-Llerena G, Guibert-Toledano M, Penedo-Coello A, et al. Community-based study to estimate prevalence and burden of illness of rheumatic diseases in Cuba: a COPCORD study. J Clin Rheumatol. 2009;15:51–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Steele K. SIDS: the role of the family doctor. Aust Fam Physician. 1989;18:1372–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Phillips RL, Bazemore AW, DeVoe JE, et al. A family medicine health technology strategy for achieving the triple aim for US health care. Fam Med. 2015;47:628–35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. The College of Family Physicians Canada. Vision, Mission, Values, and Goals. http://www.cfpc.ca/Principles/.

  6. Kumar R, Barata AN, Floss M. Primary care education: medical student and young doctors’ perspective from Brazil, India and Portugal. Educ Prim Care. 2016;27(5):345–8.

  7. Abelsen B, Gaski M, Brandstorp H. Duration of general practitioner contracts. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2015;135(22):2045–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Es JC. Training for general practice in Holland. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1972;22:289.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ge M, Jiang P, Lu W, et al. Discussion on the promotion path, service model and institutional framework of family doctor system: taking Changning as an example. Chinese Health Resources. 2012;15:420–2.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang P. Institutional characteristics and efficiency evaluation of family doctor service model-based on the practice in Shanghai Changning District. Chinese Med Insurance. 2014;04:31–3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wei LU, Yimin ZHANG, Hong LIANG, et al. Development path and logical stage analysis of family doctor system-based on the experience of Shanghai Changning. Chinese Health Policy Res. 2016;9:10–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Huang L, Gao Y. Health management practice and effectiveness analysis of family physician system: a case study of Changning District of Shanghai. Chinese Medical Insurance. 2017;02:33–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feng W, Wang H, Wang J, et al. Some thoughts on promoting the responsibility system for family doctors in Pudong New District. Chinese Gen Pract Med. 2014;12:1978–80.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pan Y, Zhang X, Zhao Y, et al. Analysis and thinking on the general practitioner training in community hospitals. Chinese Health Standards Manag. 2014;5:104–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Feng W, Wang J, Zhang X, et al. Rethinking about promoting the responsibility system for family doctors in Pudong new area. Primary Health Care in China. 2016;30:7–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Xiaopeng S, Yangmei H, Bi'e L, Yang Q, Yanrong Z, Wang W, Yang L, Lin J, Hu C, Yinwei Q. Residents' awareness of family doctor contract services, status of contract with a family doctor, and contract service needs in Zhejiang Province, China: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(18):E3312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ranjbar Ezatabadi M, Rashidian A, Shariati M, Rahimi Foroushani A, Akbari SA. Using conjoint analysis to elicit GPs' preferences for family physician contracts: a case study in Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016;18(11):e29194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Öcek ZA, Çiçeklioğlu M, Yücel U, Özdemir R. Family medicine model in Turkey: a qualitative assessment from the perspectives of primary care workers. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ly DP, Glied SA. The impact of managed care contracting on physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(1):237–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodgers DV, Wendling AL, Saba GW, Mahoney MR, Brown Speights JS. Preparing family physicians to Care for Underserved Populations: a historical perspective. Fam Med. 2017;49(4):304–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anonymous. Anhui province: plans to establish a family doctor system in 2015. Chinese Commun Phys. 2012;28(46):23.

  22. Anonymous. Pilot community family doctor system in 5 cities and counties of Hainan province. China Continuing Med Educ. 2012;4(04):56.

  23. Annemie Heselmans, Bert Aertgeerts, Peter Donceel, Siegfried Geens, Stijn Van de Velde, Dirk Ramaekers. Family physicians’ perceptions and use of electronic clinical decision support during the first year of Implementation. J Med Sys. 2012,36(6).

  24. Wang li, Yu guoliang, Yao fang, Jiang chunxin, Jiang liqun, Xiao qiwen. Practice and thinking on the construction of family doctor system in Changzhou city. Chinese rural health service management 2016,36(12):1518–1521.

  25. Teng li, Mai chenyao. A study on the willingness of community outpatients to sign up as family doctors in Nanchong city and its influencing factors. Journal of modern medicine and health 2016,32(24):3763–3766.

  26. Miller JW, Baldwin LM, Matthews B, Trivers KF, Andrilla CH, Lishner D, Goff BA. Physicians' beliefs about effectiveness of cancer screening tests: a national survey of family physicians, general internists, and obstetrician-gynecologists. Prev Med. 2014;69:37–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Xin xin, Shi chaoming. Policy analysis on the competition between hospitals and family doctors in five European countries. Journal of health economics in foreign medical 2017,34(04):145–151.

  28. Zhang caixia. Reform of the British National Health Service System and its enlightenment. Med Law 2012,4(06):80–82.

  29. Rayburn WF, Petterson SM, Phillips RL. Trends in family physicians performing deliveries, 2003-2010. Birth. 2014;41(1):26–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bowman Marjorie A, Lucan Sean C, Rosenthal Thomas C, Mainous Arch G, James PA. Family medicine research in the United States from the late 1960s into the future. Fam Med. 2017;49(4):289–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Pudong New Area Health and Family Planning Commission of Shanghai. Notice on Printing and Distributing the “Interim Measures on Further Strengthening the Construction of Rural Health Talent Team”. http://www.pudong.gov.cn/shpd/InfoOpen/InfoDetail.aspx?DeptId=003016&CategoryNum=003003074&InfoId=1dc7fc40-c93f-4364-864f-a7b73d2c9fca.

  32. He J, Tianzhang Z, Wang Dong XS, Wang L, Jianfeng C, Yang C, Xie C, Hu S. Design ideas and implementation obstacle analysis of the “1+1+1” medical institution combined contracting mechanism in Shanghai family doctors. Chinese Health Policy Res. 2018;11(12):24–8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cuiling H, Juan S, Yaling L, Yao L, Nana L. Implementation status of the “1+1+1” type of contracted family doctor Services in Shanghai:a qualitative study. Chinese Gen Pract. 2019;22(19):2308–13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all interview participants for their support and cooperation. Thanks must be given to Pudong New Area Health Commission of Shanghai for their support and cooperation in the field of data acquisition. We thank Audrey Holmes, MA, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Leading Personnel Training Program of Pudong New Area Health System (PWRL2020–05) in the collection and analysis of the data, in writing and modifying the manuscript; Leading Personnel Training Program of Pudong New Area Health System (PWRL2017–05) in the design of the study.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Shanshan Liu, Yan Liu, and Tao Zhang are authors who contributed equally to the work, should be regarded as co-first authors.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pudong Institute for Health Development, Shanghai, China

    Shanshan Liu, Hong Liang & Yimin Zhang

  2. School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Yan Liu & Gang Chen

  3. Health Inspection Agency of Shanghai Pudong New Area Health Commission, Shanghai, China

    Yan Liu

  4. Jinyang Community Health Service Center of Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China

    Tao Zhang

  5. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai, China

    Luan Wang

  6. School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Jiaoling Huang

  7. School of Social Development and Public Policy, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Hong Liang & Chengjun Liu

  8. Eye and dental diseases prevention & treatment of Pudong new area, Shanghai, China

    Chengjun Liu

Authors
  1. Shanshan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jiaoling Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hong Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Gang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chengjun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Yimin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SL, YZ, GC, and CL conceived the overall research design. SL and TZ performed the collection and sorting of data. SL and YL participated in the data analysis and wrote the paper. LW, JH and HL reviewed the manuscript and were involved in critical revision. All authors approved the final manuscript to be published.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gang Chen, Chengjun Liu or Yimin Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was granted for this study by the Pudong Institute for Health Development Ethics Committee (PDWSL2013–4). All participants completed the written informed consent forms after receiving an explanation of the study protocol.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

No competing interests were declared with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Questionnaire of Pudong New Area Family Doctors Annual Report, which was used to investigate the situation of family doctors in community health service centers from year 2013 to 2016.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, S., Liu, Y., Zhang, T. et al. The developing family doctor system: evidence from the progress of the family doctor signing service from a longitudinal survey (2013–2016) in Pudong New Area, Shanghai. BMC Fam Pract 22, 11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01353-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01353-0

Keywords

BMC Primary Care

ISSN: 2731-4553

Contact us