Marchildon GP, Hutchison B. Primary Care in Ontario, Canada: new proposals after 15 years of reform. Health Policy. 2016;120:732–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wong ST, Chau LW, Hogg W, Teare GF, Miedema B, Breton M, Aubrey-Bassler K, Katz A, Burge F, Boivin A, Cooke T, Francoeur D, Wodchis WP. An international cross-sectional survey on the quality and costs of primary care (QUALICO-PC): recruitment and data collection of places delivering primary care across Canada. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16:20.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
VanGeest JB, Johnson TP, Welch VL. Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof. 2007;30(4):303–21.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Halbesleben JRB, Whitman MV. Evaluating survey quality in health services research: a decision framework for assessing nonresponse bias. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(3):913–30.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Armstrong D, Ashworth M. When questionnaire response rates do matter: a survey of general practitioners and their views of NHS changes. Brit J Gen Pract. 2000;50:479–80.
CAS
Google Scholar
Templeton L, Deehan A, Taylor C, Drummond C, Strang J. Surveying general practitioners: does a low response rate matter? Brit J Gen Pract. 1997;47:91–4.
CAS
Google Scholar
Lippmann S, Frese T, Herrmann K, Scheller K, Sandholzer H. Primary care research - trade-off between representativeness and response rate of GP teachers for undergraduates. Swiss Med Wkly. 2012;142:w13537.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wetzel D, Himmel W, Heidenreich R, Hummers-Pradier E, Kochen MM, Rogausch A, Sigle J, Boeckmann H, Kuehnel S, Niebling W, Scheidt-Nave C. Participation in a quality of care study and consequences for generalizability of general practice research. Fam Pract. 2005;22:458–64.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Partin MR, Powell AA, Burgess DJ, Haggstrom DA, Gravely AA, Halek K, Bangerter A, Shaukat A, Nelson DB. Adding postal follow-up to a web-based survey of primary care and gastroenterology clinic physician chiefs improved response rates but not response quality or representativeness. Eval Health Prof. 2015;38(3):382–403.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Parkinson A, Jorm L, Douglas KA, Gee A, Sargent GM, Lujic S, McRae IS. Recruiting general practitioners for surveys: reflections on the difficulties and some lessons learned. Aust J Prim Health. 2015;21:254–8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bjertnaes OA, Garratt A, Botten G. Nonresponse bias and cost-effectiveness in a Norwegian survey of family physicians. Eval Health Prof. 2008;31(1):65–80.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bjertnaes OA, Iversen HH, Bukholm G. International health policy survey in 11 countries: assessment of non-response bias in the Norwegian sample. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:38.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Barclay S, Todd C, Finaly I, Grande G, Wyatt P. Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs. Fam Pract. 2002;19(1):105–11.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bowling A. Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. J Public Health. 2005;27(3):281–91.
Article
Google Scholar
Gribble R, Haupt C. Quantitative and qualitative differences between handout and mailed patient satisfaction surveys. Med Care. 2005;27(3):276–81.
Article
Google Scholar
Slater M, Kiran T. Measuring the patient experience in primary care. Can Fam Physician. 2016;62:e740–8.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Green ME, Hogg W, Savage C, Johnston S, Russell G, Jaakkimainen L, Glazier R, Barnsley J, Birtwhistle R. Assessing methods for measurement of clinical outcomes and quality of care in primary care practices. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;2:214.
Article
Google Scholar
Shortreed SM, Von Korff M, Thielke S, LeResche L, Saunders K, Rosenberg D, Turner JA. Electronic health records to evaluate and account for nonresponse bias: a survey of patients using chronic opioid therapy. Obs Stud. 2016;2:24–38.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Schäfer WLA, Boerma WGW, Kringos DS, De Maeseneer J, Gress S, Heinemann S, Rotar-Pavlic D, Seghieri C, Svab I, Van den Berg MJ, Vainieri M, Westert GP, Willems S, Groenewegen PP. QUALICOPC, a multi-country study evaluating quality, costs and equity in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:115.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Laberge M, Pang J, Walker K, Wong S, Hogg W, Wodchis WP. QUALICOPC (Quality and Costs of Primary Care) Canada: a focus on the aspects of primary care most highly rated by current patients of primary care practices. Ottawa: Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement; 2014.
Google Scholar
Jaakkimainen L, Upshur R, Klein-Geltink J, Leong A, Maaten S, Schultz S, Wang L. Primary Care in Ontario: ICES Atlas. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; 2006.
Google Scholar
Galliher JM, Bonham AJ, Dickinson LM, Staton EW, Pace WD. Representativeness of PBRN physician practice patterns and related beliefs: the case of the AAFP national research network. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7:547–54.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Queenan JA, Williamson T, Khan S, Drummond N, Garies S, Morkem R, Birtwhistle R. Representativeness of patients and providers in the Canadian primary care sentinel surveillance network: a cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open. 2016;4(1):E28-32.
Kralj B. Measuring Rurality - RIO2008_Basic: methodology and results. Toronto: OMA Department of Economics; 2009.
Matheson FI, Dunn JR, Smith KLW, Moineddin R, Glazier RH. Development of the Canadian marginalization index: a new tool for the study of inequality. Can J Public Health. 2012;103(Suppl 2):12–6.
Google Scholar
The Johns Hopkins University, “The Johns Hopkins ACG System,” 18 11 2016.;[Online]. Available: https://www.hopkinsacg.org/.
Mamdami M, Sykora K, Li P, Norman SLT, Streiner DL, Austin PC, Rochon PA, Anderson GM. Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding. BMJ. 2005;330:960–2.
Article
Google Scholar
Sawilowsky SS. New effect size rules of thumb. J Mod App Stat Meth. 2009;8(2):597–9.
Article
Google Scholar
Selby K, Cornuz J, Senn N. Establishment of a representative practice-based research network for the monitoring of primary care in Switzerland. JABFM. 2015;28(5):673–5.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lee ML, Yano EM, Wang MM, Simon BF, Rubenstein LV. What patient population does visit-based sampling in primary care settings represent? Med Care. 2002;40(9):761–70.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fourrier-Reglat A, Droz-Perroteau C, Benichou J, Depont F, Amouretti M, Begaud B, Moride Y, Blin P, Moore N. Impact of prescriber nonresponse on patient representativeness. Epidemiology. 2008;19(2):186–90.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Thompson AE, Anisimowicz Y, Miedema B, Hogg W, Wodchis WP, Aubrey-Bassler K. The influence of gender and other patient characteristics on health care-seeking behaviour: a QUALICOPC study. BMC Fam Pract. 2016;17:38.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Miedema B, Easley J, Thompson AE, Boivin A, Aubrey-Bassler K, Katz A, Hogg WE, Breton M, Francoeur D, Wong ST, Wodchis WP. Do new and traditional models of primary care differ with regard to access? Canadian QUALICOPC study. Can Fam Physician. 2016;62:54–61.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Rumball-Smith J, Wodchis WP, Kone A, Kenealy T, Barnsley J, Ashton T. Under the same roof: co-location of practitioners within primary care is associated with specialized chronic care management. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:149.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Pavlic DR, Sever M, Klemenc-Ketis Z, Svab I. Process quality indicators in family medicine: results of an international comparison. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16:172.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
van Loenen T, van den Berg MJ, Faber MJ, Westert GP. Propensity to seek healthcare in different healthcare systems: analysis of patient data in 34 countries. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:465.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar