Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of results

From: Patients’ views on usefulness and effects of a risk communication tool for cardiovascular disease: a qualitative analysis

Focus areas

Sub-areas

Resulting messages

Change of health behaviour

Motivating experiences

Autonomy to choose when to use intervention

Feeling of an increase in insight into CVD risk

Personal health gain from intervention

Relatedness

Reminders, continuously good advice, or reassurance of knowledge

Demotivating experiences

Competing illness needing priority

Non-committed health care personnel

Non-functioning IT

Information Technology (IT)

Adherence-increasing experiences

Autonomy in when to use the intervention

Easy access

Simple to use

Adherence-decreasing experiences

Lack of competences in using the IT solution

Problems getting help from IT service

Problems logging in to the software

Communication

Concerns of becoming ill

Continuously reminders do not make patients feel sicker, and in most cases, it motivates them to adhere to treatment.

Visual communication

Easier to see benefits from behavioural change

Easier to understand risk information when presented visually

Communication in written text

Didn’t find the content interesting because they knew it already

Important to use easily understandable language

Text in the intervention has been easily understandable

Worked as nudging even though informants knew the content already

Messenger dependant communication

Feelings and commitment are reflected by patients

Doctors need to help patients understand risk information and educate them

Patients trust their doctor to know what is best for them