Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the intervention models in the 68 studies

From: Characteristics of self-management education and support programmes for people with chronic diseases delivered by primary care teams: a rapid review

Number of models and integration

Dimension

Type/Name of the model

Authors

Articles

Single-dimension model (n = 38 studies)

Organisational model (n = 24 studies)

Chronic Care Model (CCM)

Wagner [38,39,40], Bodenheimer [41, 42], Coleman [43],

Boland 2015, Gucciardi 2015, Jiao 2015, Kane 2016, Ramli 2016, Francesconi 2019, Zupa 2019, Saude 2020, Vitale 2020

Added HCP (psychologist, certified diabetes educator, nurse)

 

Brumisholz 2014, Grigg 2014, Edelman 2015

Teamlet model of primary care

Bodenheimer [44]

Willard Grace 2015

Brisbane South Complex Diabetes Service (BSCDS)

Jackson [45]

Hepworth 2013

Telemedicine for Reach, Education, Access, and Treatment (TREAT) model

Toledo [46]

Siminerio 2014

Primary Care Medical Home

American Association of Family Physicians [47]

Sepers 2015

Support nucleus for the family healthcare

Brazilian Ministry of Health

Kuhmmer 2016,

Chronic Disease Self-Management Programme (CDSMP)

Lorig [48]

Moreno 2018

Iora Health

Iora [49]

Shah 2019

New Zealand specific DSME programme

Developed by the authors

Krebs 2013

Project Impact

Developed by the authors [50]

Bluml 2014

First line diabetes care (FiLDCare) Project

Developed by the authors

Ku 2014

Care Management Medical Home Centre

Developed by the authors

Page 2015

Guidance Research on Illness Perception(COPD-GRIP) intervention

Developed by the authors

Weldam 2017

Social and health behaviour models (n = 13 studies)

Behavioural model (n = 10 studies)

Motivational approach (interview, model)

Rollnick [51]

Maindal [52]

Mash 2015,

Maindal 2014

Contant 2019, Represas Carrera 2020

Transtheoretical model of behaviour change

Prochaska [53, 54]

Liddy 2014, Coultas 2017, Moriyama 2021

Managing Illness by Empowerment of Self-care and Harmonisation of Patient and Practitioner Agendas (MESH)

Developed by the authors

Denford 2013

Not specified

Rovner 2020, Batch 2021

Social-cognitive model (n = 3 studies)

Self-efficacy

Bandura [55, 56]

Ryan 2013

Empowerment theory

Funnell [57]

Piatt 2018

Common Sense model of sense-regulation

Leventhal [58]

Van Puffelen 2019

Educational model (n = 1 study)

Didactic model

Berglund [59]

Kjellsdotter 2020

Multiple models not combined (n = 5 studies)

Organisational (CCM) and educational model (5A’s)

Stellefson [60], Glasgow [61]

Talavera 2021

Motivational approach and self-efficacy

Emmons [62], Bandura [63]

Eakin 2014

Motivational approach and health belief model

Hayden [64], Hettema [65]

Ansari 2020

Health belief model and transtheoretical model of behaviour change

Janz [66], Prochaska [67]

Fort 2015

Motivational approach, transtheoretical model of behaviour change, and educational model (5A’s)

Miller [68], Goldstein [69]

Ruggiero 2014

Multi-dimension model (n = 3 studies)

Precede/Proceed model (behavioural, ecological, educational and organisational)

Green [70]

DePue 2013

HelP Diabetes (behavioural, ecological and organisational)

Corbin & Strauss [71]

Murray 2017

Medication Therapy Management model (behavioural and organisational)

American Pharmacists Association [72]

Rodis 2017

  1. CCM Chronic care model, COPD Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, DSME Diabetes self-management education, HCP Health Care Provider