Skip to main content

Table 3 Mixed-effects linear regression models for analysing the association of family factors and received instrumental social support (higher scores indicating higher support)

From: Role of family factors in provision and perception of social support for older people in Iran: a cross-sectional survey

Variables

Model 1**

Model 2

Model3

Model 4

Each single Fac.+Age + Gender

Multivariable

Family Factors + Age+

Gender

Model 2 + Other Covariates

Model 3 + Interaction of Gender

Coef. (95%CI)

P*

Coef. (95% CI)

P

Coef. (95% CI)

P

Coef. (95% CI)

P

Constant

  

3.08(2.45,3.71)

< 0.001

3.18(2.51–3.85)

< 0.001

3.16(2.55,3.78)

< 0.001

Age

        

 Continuous

-0.006(-0.01, -0.01)

0.05

<-0.01(-0.01,0.002)

0.22

<-0.01(-0.01,0.00)

0.11

<-0.01(-0.01,0.00)

0.11

Gender

        

 Man

Ref.

 

Ref. 1

 

Ref. 1

   

 Woman

-0.03(-0.12,0.06)

0.49

<-0.01(-0.10,0.09)

0.95

<-0.01(-0.11,0.09)

0.85

  

Family size

        

 0–10 members

Ref.

 

Ref. 1

 

Ref. 1

 

Ref. 1

 

 11 + members

0.22(0.08,0.36)

0.002

0.17(0.03,0.32)

0.01

0.18(0.04,0.32)

0.01

0.18(0.04,0.32)

0.01

Household size

        

 1 (only participant)

Ref.

       

 2–4 people

0.30(0.14,0.47)

0.0008

      

 5 people or more

0.32(0.12,0.52)

      

Married or not

        

 No

Ref.

       

 Yes

0.17(0.04,0.29)

0.008

      

N of children

        

 Continuous

0.04(0.01,0.06)

0.001

      

N of daughter

        

 Continuous

0.02(-0.01,0.05)

0.26

      

N of son

        

 Continuous

0.07(0.04,0.11)

< 0.001

      

Having 1 + rich child

        

 No

Ref.

       

 Yes

0.05(-0.07,0.17)

0.44

      

Having 1 + highly educated child

        

 No

Ref.

       

 Yes

0.09(-0.01,0.20)

0.09

      

Living arrangement

        

 Living alone/others

Ref.

 

Ref. 1

 

Ref. 1

 

Ref. 1

 

 Living with children only

0.31(0.13,0.49)

0.0006

0.16(-0.03,0.35)

0.01

0.12(-0.07,0.31)

0.02

0.11(-0.08,0.31)

0.05

 Living with spouse only

0.30(0.14,0.47)

0.27(0.10,0.43)

0.24(0.07,0.41)

0.23(0.06,0.40)

 Living with spouse& children

0.33(0.16,0.49)

0.16(-0.02,0.34)

0.13(-0.05,0.31)

0.12(-0.06,0.31)

Geographic proximity of 1 + child ***

       

 Same home

Ref.

       

 Same neighbourhood

0.02(-0.12,0.15)

0.15

      

 Same city or farther

-0.12(-0.25,0.01)

      

Living with 1 + daughter

        

 No

Ref.

       

 Yes

0.08(-0.03,0.20)

0.15

      

Living with 1 + son

        

 No

Ref.

       

 Yes

0.08(-0.03,0.18)

0.15

      

Quantity of contacts with 1 + child***

        

 Less than everyday

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

Ref.

 

 Everyday

0.19(0.07,0.30)

0.001

0.23(0.09,0.37)

0.001

0.22(0.08,0.36)

0.002

0.21(0.07,0.35)

0.003

Quality of relationships with spouse ***

        

 Less than very good

Ref.

       

 Very good

-0.08(-0.20,0.04)

0.21

      

Quality of relationships with 1 + child***

        

 Less than very good

Ref.

       

 Very good

-0.06(-0.17,0.04)

0.25

      

Quality of relationships with 1 + family member

        

 Less than very good

Ref.

       

 Very good

-0.04(-0.17,0.09)

0.53

      

Education

        

 Illiterate

Ref.

       

 1–9 years

0.06(-0.05,0.17)

0.22

      

 10 years and more

-0.07(-0.26,0.12)

    

Economic status perceived

        

 Poorer than average

Ref.

   

Ref. 1

 

Ref. 1

 

 Same or better than average

0.12(0.00,0.22)

0.03

  

0.08(-0.02,0.19)

0.13

0.08(-0.02,0.19)

0.11

GHQ

        

 Rest quartiles

Ref.

   

Ref. 1

   

 Worst quartile

-0.18(-0.30,-0.06)

0.002

  

-0.16(-0.28,-0.04)

0.007

  

Nagi

        

 Rest quartiles

Ref.

   

Ref. 1

 

Ref. 1

 

 Worst quartile

0.13(0.01,0.25)

0.02

  

0.18(0.06,0.30)

0.002

0.18(0.06,0.30)

0.003

Interaction GHQ*Gender P.V

      

0.076

GHQ in men

       

 Rest quartiles

     

Ref. 1

 

 Worst quartile

     

-0.04(-0.22,0.14)

0.67

GHQ in women

       

 Rest quartile

     

Ref. 1

 

 Worst quartile

     

-0.23(-0.38,-0.09)

0.001

LR test vs. linear regression P.v

Neighbourhood-level ICC

Household-level ICC

 

< 0.001

0.03

0.16

< 0.001

0.03

0.16

< 0.001

0.03

0.16

  1. * P-value of coefficient reported for each dummy variable compared to the baseline category controlled for other variables. For categorical variables overall P-value was reported using ‘testparm’ in STATA. In all models only people with complete data on all variables were included
  2. **In Model 1, ICC for levels of analysis were not reported as separate univariable models were fitted for each variable and each model had different ICC for each level
  3. ***For these variables, analysis excluded those without a spouse/ a child (Not applicable)