Category | Challenges and shortcomings |
---|---|
Organisational culture | The system’s quantitative nature and its conflicts with the implementation of quality improvement initiatives such as accreditation |
Considering accreditation as a temporary endeavour and its failure | |
The negative impact of ineffective implementation of other promotional programs | |
There needs to be more awareness of the importance of accreditation programs as an essential component in improving performance. | |
Lack of persistence in implementing and attaining the program’s goals | |
Doctors steadfastly refused to participate in the program despite their leadership positions at the facilities. | |
An inadequate organisational culture of transparency and objective accountability | |
motivational mechanisms | Deficiency in defining the financial, professional, scientific, and spiritual motivations of the program for the participants |
Inadequate specification of organisational incentives of the program, such as budget and insurance tariffs for successful centres | |
Employees and managers’ extreme reliance on external motives and the lack of continuity of these motivators | |
Some centre workers, particularly the doctors, are on a temporary contract. | |
Migration of skilled forces from less privileged places to affluent communities | |
Staff workload | A need for more personnel forces employees to take on various duties and responsibilities. |
Due to crises, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the high volume of health programs, employees are under great stress. | |
Educational system | Training for managers and staff on accreditation and quality improvement needs to be improved at the university level, as pre-service and in-service training. |
Accreditation programs in the country need more comprehensive and practical training sets. | |
Inadequate knowledge of managers and staff of the studies on health systems | |
System managers and family doctors lack the knowledge and abilities to administer the healthcare system effectively. | |
Information system | Inefficient design of the SIB system as a health information system |
Inaccurate data submission in SIB results in incorrect output. | |
Lack of a verification method to ensure the accuracy of the submitted data in the SIB system, as well as other performance reports | |
Macro-executive infrastructure | The Deputy of the Ministry of Health and the University of Medical Sciences, as well as the country’s health networks, lack accreditation and a quality improvement unit |
More health management specialists and experts are needed to operate in the health care system. | |
Lack of participation of international accreditation and quality improvement organisations in the design or implementation of the program | |
Nationally, there is a deficiency in the training of accreditation assessors. | |
Failure to appoint a competent and non-governmental entity to oversee accreditation with the cooperation of representatives from all relevant parties | |
Lack of a clearly defined accreditation procedure in Iran | |
Excessive system centralisation and a lack of environmental unit authority in the design and execution of health interventions | |
Failure to approve the program in the form of a law governing its retention in the system |