Skip to main content

Table 3 Patients’ and GPs’ experiences with the symptom checker (post-visit questionnaires): quantitative results

From: Supporting primary care through symptom checking artificial intelligence: a study of patient and physician attitudes in Italian general practice

General satisfaction with the symptom checker

 

Patients (n = 110)

GPs (n = 122) i

 Very satisfied

21 (19.1%)

21 (17.2%)

 Rather satisfied

33 (30.0%)

12 (9.8%)

 Neutral

51 (46.4%)

60 (49.2%)

 Rather dissatisfied

3 (2.7%)

19 (15.6%)

 Very dissatisfied

2 (1.8%)

10 (8.2%)

Quality of the chatbot result from a clinical point of view

 

-

GPs (n = 122)

 Very appropriate

-

22 (18.0%)

 Rather appropriate

-

16 (13.1%)

 Neutral

-

54 (44.3%)

 Rather inappropriate

-

19 (15.6%)

 Very inappropriate

-

11 (9.0%)

Concordance of the chatbot result with the GP’s clinical appraisal

 

-

GPs (n = 122)

 Completely concordant

-

27 (22.1%)

 Rather concordant

-

35 (28.7%)

 Rather not concordant

-

41 (33.6%)

 Not concordant at all

-

19 (15.6%)

Impact of the use of the symptom checker on the quality of the medical visit

 

Patients (n = 111)

GPs (n = 122)

 Very positively

6 (5.4%)

8 (6.6%)

 Rather positively

23 (20.7%)

18 (14.8%)

 Neutral

81 (73.0%)

93 (76.2%)

 Rather negatively

1 (0.9%)

2 (1.6%)

 Very negatively

0 (0.0%)

1 (0.8%)

Helpfulness of the symptom checker for the medical visit

 

Patients (n = 110)

GPs (n = 122)

 Very helpful

5 (4.5%)

9 (7.4%)

 Rather helpful

23 (20.9%)

15 (12.3%)

 Neutral

62 (56.4%)

75 (61.5%)

 Rather not helpful

8 (7.3%)

9 (7.4%)

 Not helpful at all

12 (10.9%)

14 (11.5%)

Disturbance of the medical visit by the use of the symptom checker

 

Patients (n = 110)

GPs (n = 122)

 Very disturbing

0 (0.0%)

1 (0.8%)

 Rather disturbing

3 (2.7%)

0 (0.0%)

 Neutral

33 (30.0%)

59 (48.4%)

 Rather not disturbing

17 (15.5%)

15 (12.3%)

 Not disturbing at all

57 (51.8%)

47 (38.5%)

Were the patients’ indications on the symptom checker considered by the GP?

 

Patients (n = 102)

-

 Yes

80 (78.4%)

-

 No

22 (21.6%)

-

Duration of the medical visit compared with the time expected

 

Patients (n = 113)

GPs (n = 122)

 Much shorter

3 (2.7%)

1 (0.8%)

 Rather shorter

10 (8.8%)

7 (5.7%)

 Unvaried

85 (75.2%)

102 (83.6%)

 Rather longer

15 (13.3%)

11 (9.0%)

 Much longer

0 (0.0%)

1 (0.8%)

Subjective valuation of the duration of the medical visit

 

Patients (n = 115)

GPs (n = 122)

 Too short

2 (1.7%)

1 (0.8%)

 Adequate

109 (94.8%)

115 (94.3%)

 Too long

4 (3.5%)

6 (4.9%)

Future at-home use of the symptom checker as an aid to the appraisal of health problems

 

Patients (n = 115)

-

 Yes, surely

28 (24.3%)

-

 Rather yes

26 (22.6%)

-

 Neutral

27 (23.5%)

-

 Rather not

28 (24.3%)

-

 Absolutely not

6 (5.2%)

-

Satisfaction with the usability of the symptom checker

 

Patients (n = 115)

-

 Very satisfied

27 (23.5%)

-

 Rather satisfied

48 (41.7%)

-

 Neutral

28 (24.3%)

-

 Rather dissatisfied

8 (7.0%)

-

 Very dissatisfied

4 (3.5%)

-

  1. GPs General practitioners, DDs Differential diagnoses
  2. i total of 122 questionnaires were completed by participating GPs throughout the study period