Skip to main content

Table 5 The management services for T2DM delivered by health professionals with different perception on opportunity factors

From: Study on the determinants of health professionals’ performance on diabetes management care in China

Item

Screening (%)

Diagnosis (%)

Regular treatment (%)

Diet/exercise guidance (%)

Follow-up visit (%)

Complication examination (%)

Referral (%)

Information sharing

       

 Very good

90.8(79/87)

79.3(69/87)

77.0(67/87)

93.1(81/87)

94.3(82/87)

73.6(64/87)

85.1(74/87)

 Relatively good

78.0(198/254)

66.8(169/253)

70.4(178/253)

85.0(215/253)

82.5(207/251)

57.9(146/252)

75.0(189/252)

 Relatively bad

80.0(20/25)

64.0(16/25)

64.0(16/25)

80.0(20/25)

80.0(20/25)

48.0(12/25)

64.0(16/25)

 Very bad

90.9(10/11)

72.7(8/11)

81.8(9/11)

90.9(10/11)

90.9(10/11)

63.6(7/11)

80.0(8/10)

 Have no idea

22.2(4/18)

11.1(2/18)

11.1(2/18)

22.2(4/18)

27.8(5/18)

11.1(2/18)

23.5(4/17)

 χ2 / P

42.885/0.000

31.665/0.000

32.185/0.000

56.634/0.000

46.621/0.000

26.108/0.000

29.937/0.000

Device configuration

       

 Adequate

76.9(230/299)

69.5(207/298)

69.5(207/298)

82.9(247/298)

82.5(245/297)

58.6(174/297)

74.7(221/296)

 Deficient

80.4(86/107)

55.1(59/107)

64.5(69/107)

82.2(88/107)

79.2(84/106)

56.1(60/107)

69.8(74/106)

 χ2 / P

0.544/0.461

7.165/0.007

0.899/0.343

0.023/0.880

0.549/0.459

0.204/0.652

0.940/0.332

Drug configuration

       

 Adequate

75.6(205/271)

65.6(177/270)

66.7(180/270)

82.2(222/270)

83.2(223/268)

61.0(164/269)

71.7(193/269)

 Deficient

82.2(111/135)

65.9(89/135)

71.1(96/135)

83.7(113/135)

78.5(106/135)

51.9(70/135)

76.7(102/133)

 χ2 / P

2.259/0.133

0.006/0.941

0.819/0.365

0.138/0.710

1.318/0.251

3.064/0.080

1.114/0.291