Skip to main content

Table 3 Generalized linear mixed effect model of overall usage

From: Uptake of signposting to web-based resources: pregnant women’s use of a preventive web-based intervention

 

Model 3

 

Casual user

Engaged user

Independent variables

p

OR

95% CI

p

OR

95% CI

Age

 20-24

0.89

1.11

0.24 – 5.12

< .05*

0.95

0.19 – 4.62

 25-29

0.05

0.48

0.23 – 0.99

0.10

0.54

0.26 – 1.12

 30-34

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 35-39

0.26

1.60

0.71 – 3.58

< .05*

2.48

1.03 – 5.92

 > 40

0.92

0.94

0.28 – 3.14

0.57

0.59

0.13 – 2.71

Parity

 Nullipara

Ref.

  

Ref.

  

 Primipara

0.25

0.68

0.36 – 1.30

< .05*

0.23

0.12 – 0.46

 Multipara

0.35

0.64

0.24 – 1.65

< .05*

0.08

0.02 – 0.29

Nurse or midwife

 Nurse

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 Midwife

0.26

0.25

0.02 – 2.84

0.73

1.32

0.27 – 6.48

 Nurse + midwife

0.34

0.60

0.21 – 1.70

0.50

0.69

0.23 – 2.01

 No nurse or midwife

< .05*

0.43

0.20 – 0.93

< .05*

0.17

0.07 – 0.44

Occupational status

 Employed

Ref.

  

Ref.

  

 Unemployed

0.50

1.53

0.44 – 5.28

0.57

0.69

0.20 – 2.45

 Sick leave or leave

0.74

0.83

0.27 – 2.56

0.84

0.87

0.24 – 3.23

 Studying

< .05*

3.40

1.34 – 8.57

0.12

2.08

0.83 – 5.26

Region

 Capital region of Denmark

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

Ref.

 Region Zealand

0.05

1.87

0.99 – 3.51

< .05*

2.40

1.22 – 4.76

  1. Results from the analysis with the five most contributive variables derived from the relative importance analysis is presented in model 3
  2. The table shows p-values, odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for both casual users and engaged users
  3. Casual user: < 20 interactions on webpage, Engaged user: ≥ 20 interactions on webpage
  4. * p < 0.05