Table 4 Effect attributable to seeing a GP from the global effect of having an RP on screening uptake according to the place of residence in Midi Pyrénées (2012): multivariable logistic regression models with and without the variable “GP consultation within the year". Adjusted on the previously identified confounding factors (Table 2 for mammography and Table 3 for pap smear). In population B for mammography and C for pap-smear

Mammography

Toulouse

OR_adj (95%CI)

Large urban areas

OR_adj (95%CI)

Other areas

OR_adj (95%CI)

Adjusted on the same confounding factors as in Table 2

Adjusted on the same factors + GP consultation within the year

Adjusted on the same confounding factors as in Table 2

Adjusted on the same factors + GP consultation within the year

Adjusted on the same confounding factors as in Table 2

Adjusted on the same factors + GP consultation within the year

Designated RP

No^a

Yes

1

14.094 (12.11; 16.524)

1

8.156 (6.979; 9.596)

1

8.387 (7.601;9.282)

1

5.214 (4.714; 5.783)

1

6.376 (5.819;7.003)

1

3.951 (3.597; 4.349)

 ≥ 1 GP consultation

within the year

No^a

Yes

1

2.32 (2.197; 2.45)

1

2.252 (2.169; 2.339)

1

2.485 (2.389; 2.586)

Pap smear

Toulouse

OR_adj (95%CI)

Large urban areas

OR_adj (95%CI)

Other areas

OR_adj (95%CI)

Adjusted on the same confounding factors as in Table 3

Adjusted on the same factors + GP consultation within the year

Adjusted on the same confounding factors as in Table 3

Adjusted on the same factors + GP consultation within the year

Adjusted on the same confounding factors as in Table 3

Adjusted on the same factors + GP consultation within the year

Designated RP

No^a

Yes

1

5.838 (5.54;6.156)

1

3.681 (3.485; 3.89)

1

5.254 (5.002;5.523)

1

3.653 (3.472; 3.845)

1

5.099 (4.814;5.406)

1

3.602 (3.396; 3.824)

 ≥ 1 GP consultation

within the year

No^a

Yes

1

2.436 (2.364; 2.51)

1

2.171 (2.12; 2.224)

1

2.231 (2.168; 2.296)