Skip to main content

Table 2 Diabetes riska prevalence in 1272 Norwegians in general practice without a known diagnosis of diabetes

From: Prevalence of increased risk of type 2 diabetes in general practice: a cross-sectional study in Norway

 

N (%)

FINDRISCa prevalence, % (95% CI)

  

 ≥ 11

 ≥ 15

All (95% CI)

1272 (100.0)

32.8 (30.3–35.4)

10.0 (8.6–11.9)

By groups

 Sex

  Men

579 (45.5)

32.3 (28.6–36.2)

9.7 (7.5–12.4)

  Women

693 (54.5)

33.2 (29.8–36.8)

10.5 (8.5–13.1)

Age categories

 All

  18–39

321 (25.2)

7.8 (5.3–11.3)

0.9 (0.3–2.9)

  40–59

445 (35.0)

32.1 (28.0–36.6)

8.3 (6.1–11.3)

  60–75

428 (33.7)

47.4 (42.7–52.2)

16.8 (13.6–20.7)

  76–80

78 (6.1)

59.0 (47.8–69.3)

21.8 (14.0–32.3)

 Men

 18–39

105 (31.2)

5.7 (2.6–12.2)

9.5 (1.3–6.5)

  40–59

195 (33.7)

27.7 (21.9–34.4)

5.1 (2.8–9.3)

  60–75

236 (40.8)

44.9 (38.7–51.3)

16.1 (11.9–21.4)

  76–80

43 (7.4)

48.8 (34.4–63.5)

16.3 (8.0–30.4)

 Women

  18–39

216 (31.2)

8.8 (5.7–13.4)

0.9 (0.2–3.6)

  40–59

250 (27.7)

35.6 (29.9–41.7)

10.8 (7.5–15.3)

  60–75

192 (27.7)

50.5 (43.5–57.5)

17.7 (12.9–23.8)

  76–80

35 (5.1)

71.4 (54.5–83.9)

28.6 (16.1–45.5)

  1. CI indicates confidence interval
  2. aThe Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC)