Skip to main content

Table 3 Patient and provider characteristics over time: GMF vs. non-GMF

From: Team-based primary care reforms and older adults: a descriptive assessment of sociodemographic trends and prescribing endpoints in two Canadian provinces

 

QC

GMF

Non-GMF

2006

2010

2014

2018

2006

2010

2014

2018

Patient characteristics

 N

110,434

339,807

587,022

784,561

785,594

663,080

571,228

556,711

 Age (mean (sd))

74.9 (6.5)

75.0 (6.8)

74.9 (7.0)

74.8 (7.0)

74.8 (6.6)

75.0 (6.9)

74.9 (7.2)

74.9 (7.2)

 Female

58.9%

57.4%

56.4%

55.2%

58.0%

56.9%

55.4%

54.7%

 Rural

28.1%

26.1%

25.9%

24.1%

20.6%

19.1%

17.3%

18.5%

 Unique prescribers (mean (sd))

4.9 (2.2)

5.4 (2.6)

5.7 (2.7)

5.6 (2.5)

4.8 (2.2)

5.3 (2.6)

5.5 (2.7)

5.4 (2.5)

 Unique drugs prescribed (mean (sd))a

6.6 (4.2)

6.8 (4.5)

7.0 (4.6)

6.9 (4.7)

6.0 (4.3)

6.3 (4.6)

6.4 (4.8)

6.4 (4.8)

 Primary care visits (mean (sd))

6.0 (8.7)

5.6 (8.8)

5.1 (8.4)

4.6 (7.5)

6.0 (9.1)

5.5 (9.2)

5.1 (9.1)

4.7 (8.4)

Income quintileb

 Missing

6.1%

6.4%

2.5%

2.3%

6.3%

6.6%

2.8%

2.6%

 1 (highest)

10.5%

13.0%

13.3%

15.1%

12.2%

13.1%

14.5%

15.5%

 2

17.0%

18.6%

18.1%

19.3%

16.7%

17.2%

16.6%

17.0%

 3

19.3%

20.3%

21.5%

21.7%

20.8%

20.7%

20.0%

20.0%

 4

23.5%

21.8%

22.9%

21.8%

21.9%

21.1%

22.6%

22.2%

 5 (lowest)

23.7%

19.8%

21.7%

19.9%

22.1%

21.3%

23.5%

22.7%

Provider characteristicsc

 N

943

2,354

3,552

4,435

3,720

3,085

2,272

2,128

 Years in practice (mean (sd))

18.9 (9.5)

20.7 (10.7)

21.6 (12.1)

20.6 (13.4)

21.2 (9.2)

23.4 (10.6)

25.2 (11.9)

24.4 (14.0)

 Female

49%

51%

55%

59%

43%

46%

49%

53%

 Mean older (66+) patients per physicianc

111.7

129.9

159.7

163

186.7

168.9

193.6

199.8

  1. aUnique drugs defined according to ATC code (3rd level). bArea-level deprivation measures were only available in QC in 2006 and 2016. We report the 2006 index in data years 2006/10, and the 2016 index in data years 2014/18. cCaptures only providers who interact with patients in our sample (not illustrative of all QC family physicians). Likewise, statistics on the number of patients per physician reflects only patients in our sample (these numbers would increase substantially if we were to look at the general population)