Skip to main content

Table 2 Patient socio-demographic and health statues characteristics and GP information

From: Process quality of type 2 diabetes mellitus care and association with patient perceived attributes of family doctor service in urban general practices, Beijing, China

Characteristics

N

Percent (%)

Patient Characteristics (N = 400)

 Gender

  Male

168

42.0

  Female

232

58.0

 Age group (ranging from 38 to 92)

   < 65 years

137

34.2

  65–74 years

155

38.8

   ≥ 75 years

108

27.0

 Marital status

  with spouse

319

79.8

  without a spouse

81

20.2

 Education level

  Junior high school and below

182

45.5

  High school and above

218

54.5

 Coexisting health problems (ranging from 0 to 7)

  T2DM only

39

9.8

  1–2

220

55.0

   ≥ 3

141

35.2

 Number of years since diagnosis (ranging from 1 to 59)

   ≤ 10 years

168

42.0

   > 10 years

231

57.8

 T2DM associated therapy

  Oral anti-diabetic medication only

297

74.2

  Combination of oral medication and insulin

71

17.8

  Others a

32

8.0

 Number of T2DM related visits per year b

   ≤ 12 times

151

37.8

   > 12 times

246

61.5

 Self-reported health status (ranging from 10 to 100)

   < 60

39

9.8

   ≥ 60

361

90.2

GP Characteristics (N = 15)

 Age group (ranging from 37 to 49)

   ≤ 40 years

7

46.7

  41 ~ 45 years

4

26.7

   > 45 years

4

26.7

  Female

15

100.0

 Highest degree

  Master

4

26.7

  Bachelor and below c

11

66.7

 GP working years (ranging from 8 to 30)

   ≤ 10 years

4

26.7

  11–15 years

5

33.3

   > 15 years

6

40.0

 Professional title

  Intermediate grade title

6

40.0

  Senior grade title

9

60.0

 GP training

  No training experience

4

26.7

  On-job training

11

73.3

Number of contracted T2DM patients (ranging from 120 to 539)

   < 300

5

33.3

  300–400

6

40.0

   > 400

4

26.7

  1. GP General practitioner, T2DM Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  2. aIncluding physiotherapy, health products, lifestyle intervention and insulin only
  3. bRanges of T2DM related visit per year were collected, no specific numbers
  4. cTen GPs had a bachelor’s degree and one GP had a college degree