Practitioner perceptions of the feasibility of common frailty screening instruments within general practice settings: a mixed methods study

Table 4 Participant rankings for frailty screening instruments by instrument and ranked position (n = 39)

Instrument	First place ranking (most feasible)	Top third ranking	Bottom third ranking	Last place ranking (e.g. least feasible)
	%	%	%	%
EFS	34.9	69.8	9.3	2.3
KC	23.3	60.5	18.6	2.3
GFI	9.3	53.5	25.6	4.7
TUG	9.3	25.6	51.2	7
P7	7	23.3	55.8	27.9
FQ	7	37.2	34.9	9.3
GST	0	2.3	76.7	37.2

Abbreviations: P7 PRISMA-7, FQ Frail Questionnaire, GST Gait Speed Test, GFI Groningen Frailty Indicator, EFS Edmonton Frail Scale, KC Kihon Checklist, TUG Timed Up and Go
NB: Tables 3 and 4 exclude 4 GPs missing the KC from their rankings

ISSN: 2731-4553