Skip to main content

Table 3 Individual and organizational factors potentially associated with the initiative of contacting vulnerable patients during the first COVID-19 lockdown in 2020 (considered as a dichotomous variable and in three categories): bivariate analysis (n = 3012 French general practitioners)

From: The challenge for general practitioners to keep in touch with vulnerable patients during the COVID-19 lockdown: an observational study in France

Bivariate analysis with initiatives considered as:

Dichotomous variable

Variable in 3 categories

 

n (%)

No initiative (reference)

n = 785

Yes, with or without criteriaa

n = 2227

pb

Yes, without criteriaa

n = 1419

Yes, with criteriaa

n = 808

pc

Gender

<  0.01

 Women

394 (23.7)

1265 (76.3)

0.001

799 (48.2)

466 (28.1)

 Men

391 (28.9)

962 (71.1)

620 (45.8)

342 (25.3)

Age group

0.01

  < 40 years

314 (27.9)

813 (72.1)

0.11

515 (45.7)

298 (26.4)

 [40-55[

205 (23.7)

659 (76.3)

396 (45.8)

263 (30.4)

  > 55 years

264 (26.1)

746 (73.9)

503 (49.8)

243 (24.1)

Missing data

2

9

 

5

4

Teaching activities

<  0.01

 Yes

501 (24.4)

1556 (75.6)

0.002

926 (45.0)

630 (30.6)

 No

284 (29.7)

671 (70.3)

493 (51.6)

178 (18.6)

Complementary activity in local hospital

0.06

 Yes

48 (25.4)

141 (74.6)

0.83

77 (40.7)

64 (33.9)

 No

737 (26.1)

2086 (73.9)

1342 (47.5)

744 (26.4)

Complementary activity as nursing home manager

0.04

 Yes

46 (33.3)

92 (66.7)

0.05

66 (47.8)

26 (18.8)

 No

739 (25.7)

2135 (74.3)

1353 (47.1)

782 (27.2)

Usual annual activity

0.27

  < 3500 encounters per year

144 (25.4)

424 (74.6)

0.58

253 (44.5)

171 (30.1)

 Between 3500 and 6000

487 (25.8)

1403 (74.2)

902 (47.7)

501 (26.5)

  > 6000 encounters per year

154 (27.8)

400 (72.2)

264 (47.7)

136 (24.6)

Usual daily activity

0.81

  < 20 patients

105 (26.9)

285 (73.1)

0.77

177 (45.4)

108 (27.7)

 [20-30[

592 (25.7)

1710 (74.3)

1086 (47.2)

624 (27.1)

  > 30 patients

84 (27.3)

224 (72.7)

149 (48.4)

75 (24.4)

Missing data

4

8

7

1

Quantitative change of activity (last 7 days)

0.79

  < 50%

128 (26.8)

150 (54.0)

<  0.001

22 (46.4)

128 (26.8)

 50 to 99%

406 (26.0)

1157 (74.0)

749 (47.9)

408 (26.1)

 Same number

208 (26.1)

587 (73.8)

359 (45.2)

228 (28.7)

 More patients

43 (24.4)

133 (75.6)

89 (50.6)

44 (25.0)

Number of patients hospitalized for COVID-19

<  0.01

 None

292 (29.7)

691 (70.3)

0.003

448 (45.6)

243 (24.7)

 1-5

391 (24.7)

1192 (75.3)

765 (48.3)

427 (27.0)

  > 5 patients

95 (22.1)

334 (77.9)

199 (46.4)

135 (31.5)

Missing data

7

10

7

3

Number of patients who died due to COVID-19

<  0.01

 None

292 (29.7)

691 (70.3)

<  0.01

448 (45.6)

243 (24.7)

 1-2 patients

261 (27.7)

681 (72.3)

436 (46.3)

245 (26.0)

  > 2 patients

225 (21.0)

845 (79.0)

528 (49.4)

317 (29.6)

Missing data

7

10

7

3

Type of practice

<  0.01

 Alone

146 (31.1)

323 (68.9)

<  0.01

231 (49.3)

92 (19.6)

 Monodisciplinary practice

338 (26.0)

962 (74.0)

654 (50.3)

308 (23.7)

 Independent multidisciplinary group

278 (25.3)

821 (74.7)

460 (41.9)

361 (32.9)

 Care centre

18 (14.0)

111 (86.0)

67 (51.9)

44 (34.1)

Missing data

5

10

7

3

Size of practice

<  0.01

 Alone

146 (31.1)

323 (68.9)

0.04

231 (49.3)

92 (19.6)

  < 5 professionals

322 (25.6)

937 (74.4)

634 (50.4)

303 (24.1)

 [6-20[

271 (25.0)

813 (75.0)

478 (44.1)

335 (30.9)

  > 20 professionals

45 (22.6)

154 (77.4)

76 (38.2)

78 (39.2)

 

Missing data

1

0

0

0

  1. acriteria is a shortcut for “criteria-based strategy”
  2. bcomparison between “no initiative” and “initiative with or without criteria-based strategy” (dichotomous variable)
  3. ccomparison between “no initiative”, “initiative with criteria-based strategy” and “initiative without criteria-based strategy” (3-category variable)
  4. p values <  0.05 are bolded