Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Jan 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
26 Feb 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Roger Jones |
10 Mar 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mette Brekke |
11 Mar 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
14 Mar 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
16 Mar 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hasse Melbye |
13 Sep 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Rikke Vognbjerg Sydenham |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
13 Sep 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Sep 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Roger Jones |
29 Sep 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mette Brekke |
2 Oct 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
3 Oct 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
6 Oct 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hasse Melbye |
25 Nov 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Rikke Vognbjerg Sydenham |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Nov 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
2 Dec 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Rikke Vognbjerg Sydenham |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 Dec 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
10 Dec 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Mette Brekke |
13 Dec 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hasse Melbye |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
Publishing | ||
14 Dec 2021 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Jan 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12875-021-01614-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.