Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Finding common (research) ground between general practitioners and neuroscientists: the vital role of knowledge circulation in closing the evidence-to-practice gap

Original Submission
5 May 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 May 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
3 Jun 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Kühlein
25 Jun 2021 Author responded Author comments - Astrid Eich-Krohm
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jun 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Jun 2021 Author responded Author comments - Astrid Eich-Krohm
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Jun 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Jun 2021 Author responded Author comments - Astrid Eich-Krohm
Resubmission - Version 5
29 Jun 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 5
30 Jun 2021 Author responded Author comments - Astrid Eich-Krohm
Resubmission - Version 6
30 Jun 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 6
2 Jul 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
5 Jul 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Kühlein
12 Jul 2021 Author responded Author comments - Astrid Eich-Krohm
Resubmission - Version 7
12 Jul 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 7
28 Jul 2021 Author responded Author comments - Astrid Eich-Krohm
Resubmission - Version 8
28 Jul 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 8
21 Sep 2021 Author responded Author comments - Astrid Eich-Krohm
Resubmission - Version 9
21 Sep 2021 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
11 Oct 2021 Editorially accepted
20 Oct 2021 Article published 10.1186/s12875-021-01560-3

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page