Table 4 Exploratory analyses of factors associated with user experience

Likes and dislikes correlated with continued booth use

Currently swabbing with booth (n = 68)

Currently swabbing without booth (n = 16)

p-value

Likes:

• It creates a separate space for swabbing

53 (78%)

7 (44%)

0.006^a

• It is easy to move around

38 (56%)

4 (25%)

0.026

• It is easy to conduct swab tests using the booth

40 (59%)

0 (0%)

< 0.001

• It provides protection for the swabber

65 (96%)

13 (81%)

0.045^a

• It provides privacy to the patient

33 (49%)

3 (19%)

0.030

• It makes the disinfection process easier and quicker

47 (69%)

7 (44%)

0.057^a

Dislikes:

• It takes up too much space

18 (26%)

10 (63%)

0.006^a

• Difficult to conduct swab tests using the booth

13 (19%)

14 (88%)

< 0.001

• Difficult to disinfect

10 (15%)

4 (25%)

0.320

• Troublesome to set up and store

7 (10%)

7 (44%)

0.001^a

• Inadequate patient privacy

7 (10%)

4 (25%)

0.117

• Inadequate swabber protection

0 (0%)

1 (6%)

0.038^a

Commented on gloves

22 (32%)

4 (25%)

0.567

Commented on glove ports

9 (13%)

4 (25%)

0.242

Note. Chi-square tests of associations were performed for all analyses. Results in bold are statistically significant

^a some cells have expected count less than 5

Comparison of users < 50 years old and ≥ 50 years old

< 50 years old (n = 50)

≥50 years old (n = 42)

p-value

Currently using the booth

36 (72%)

32 (76%)

0.252

Not swabbing prior to receiving booth

18 (36%)

25 (60%)

0.024

Total number of likes

3.45 (1.74)

4.13 (1.34)

0.044

Total number of dislikes

1.47 (1.25)

1.74 (1.33)

0.326

How important was getting the booth to your decision to participate in SASH? (1 = not important; 4 = very important)

2.64 (1.17)

2.88 (1.04)

0.305

How likely are you to recommend the booth? (1 = will strongly recommend; 5 = strongly will not recommend)

2.04 (1.07)

1.85 (0.88)

0.361