Skip to main content

Table 6 Logistic regression analysis to see the actual participating in pay-for-performance programs

From: Awareness of, attitude toward, and willingness to participate in pay for performance programs among family physicians: a cross-sectional study

Items

Odds Ratio (95% C.I.)

Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% C.I.)

Age

Continuous variables

0.99

(0.98~1.00)

0.98

(0.96~1.00)

Gender

Male /female (1)

0.97

(0.62~1.52)

1.15

(0.68~1.92)

Better understanding about P4P programs

Answering 7 or more items/answering less than 7 items out of a total of 10 items (1)

2.65

(1.72~4.09)*

2.39

(1.50~3.83)*

Positive attitude toward P4P programs

Scoring 18 points or higher/scoring lower than 18 points out of a total score of 30 points (1)

2.37

(1.33~4.25)*

1.12

(0.55~2.30)

Negative attitude toward P4P programs

Scoring 18 points or higher/scoring lower than 18 points out of a total score of 30 points (1)

0.45

(0.29~0.71)*

0.50

(0.31~0.80)*

Higher subjective norms

Scoring 12 points or higher/scoring lower than 12 points out of a total score of 20 points (1)

2.60

(1.44~4.68)*

1.99

(0.97~4.11)

FPICP participation

Yes/no (1)

2.27

(1.56~3.31)*

2.70

(1.78~4.09)*

  1. P4P Pay for performance
  2. FPICP Family Practice Integrated Care Project
  3. C.I. Confidence Interval
  4. Adjusted odds ratio: adjusted age, gender
  5. *p < 0.05