Peer Review reports
From: Identifying ‘avoidable harm’ in family practice: a RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method consensus study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 Jun 2018 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 29 Jun 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Carson-Stevens |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 29 Jun 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 29 Aug 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Carson-Stevens |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 29 Aug 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 31 Jan 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Gale |
| 8 Feb 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lilli Herzig |
| 29 Mar 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Carson-Stevens |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 29 Mar 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 13 Jun 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Christopher Gale |
| 4 Jul 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Carson-Stevens |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 4 Jul 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 8 Jul 2019 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 Oct 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s12875-019-0990-z |
You can find further information about peer review here.