Peer Review reports
From: Understanding accreditation standards in general practice – a qualitative study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17 Oct 2018 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 28 Oct 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antonija Poplas Susic |
| 22 Nov 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maria-Pilar Astier-Peña |
| 20 Dec 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Tina Drud Due |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 20 Dec 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 4 Jan 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Tina Drud Due |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 4 Jan 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 15 Jan 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Tina Drud Due |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 15 Jan 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Publishing | ||
| 16 Jan 2019 | Editorially accepted | |
| 31 Jan 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s12875-019-0910-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.