Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
3 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 Oct 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Anneke van Schaik |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
5 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
14 Nov 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patrick Raue |
11 Jan 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Anneke van Schaik |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
11 Jan 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
12 Feb 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patrick Raue |
3 Jun 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Bruce Arroll |
12 Jul 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Anneke van Schaik |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 Jul 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
12 Jul 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Anneke van Schaik |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
12 Jul 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
16 Aug 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Anneke van Schaik |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
16 Aug 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
6 Sep 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Anneke van Schaik |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
6 Sep 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
13 Sep 2007 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Sep 2007 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-8-52 |
You can find further information about peer review here.