Peer Review reports
From: The meaning of quality work from the general practitioner's perspective: an interview study
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 30 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Eva Lena Strandberg |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 30 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 4 Jul 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Rosemann |
| 18 Jul 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Flora Haaijer-Ruskamp |
| 9 Aug 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Eva Lena Strandberg |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 9 Aug 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 19 Aug 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Thomas Rosemann |
| 4 Sep 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Flora Haaijer-Ruskamp |
| 9 Oct 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Eva Lena Strandberg |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 9 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 18 Oct 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Eva Lena Strandberg |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 18 Oct 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 19 Oct 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
| 19 Oct 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-7-60 |
You can find further information about peer review here.