Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 May 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
12 Aug 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wendee Wechsberg |
5 Sep 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nat Wright |
21 Oct 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Anne Pelet |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
25 Oct 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Anne Pelet |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
25 Oct 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
6 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wendee Wechsberg |
7 Nov 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nat Wright |
21 Nov 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Anne Pelet |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
21 Nov 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
17 Dec 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Anne Pelet |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
17 Dec 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
19 Dec 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
19 Dec 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-6-51 |
You can find further information about peer review here.