Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 Apr 2005 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 20 Apr 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Stokes |
| 29 Apr 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Suzanne Cashman |
| 24 May 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Neal |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 24 May 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 25 May 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Stokes |
| 31 May 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Suzanne Cashman |
| 8 Jul 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Neal |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 8 Jul 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 8 Jul 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Neal |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 8 Jul 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 29 Jul 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Suzanne Cashman |
| 9 Aug 2005 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Neal |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 9 Aug 2005 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 6 Sep 2005 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Suzanne Cashman |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 7 Nov 2005 | Editorially accepted | |
| 7 Nov 2005 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-6-47 |
You can find further information about peer review here.