Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
11 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
11 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Christophe BERKHOUT |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
11 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
15 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Christophe BERKHOUT |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
15 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
3 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Murchie |
9 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Larcombe |
17 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Christophe BERKHOUT |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
17 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
20 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Murchie |
1 Apr 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Larcombe |
28 Apr 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Christophe BERKHOUT |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
28 Apr 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
27 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Christophe BERKHOUT |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
27 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
31 May 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Jun 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-13-63 |
You can find further information about peer review here.