Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 12 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie Richardson |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 12 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 19 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sharon Lawn |
| 29 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anna Faul |
| 30 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie Richardson |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 30 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 15 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sharon Lawn |
| 17 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Anna Faul |
| 24 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie Richardson |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 24 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 13 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie Richardson |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 13 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 13 Mar 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Julie Richardson |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 13 Mar 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| Publishing | ||
| 3 Apr 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 3 Apr 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-13-29 |
You can find further information about peer review here.