Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 May 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 24 May 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Roy Remmen |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 24 May 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 13 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - HARRY AHMED |
| 27 Jun 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sandra Zwolsman |
| 26 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Roy Remmen |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 26 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 31 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - HARRY AHMED |
| 13 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sandra Zwolsman |
| 3 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Roy Remmen |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 3 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 3 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Roy Remmen |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 3 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 Oct 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 15 Oct 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-13-103 |
You can find further information about peer review here.