Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
26 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
24 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Noah Ivers |
6 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eva Blozik |
15 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Konietschke |
29 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raija Sipila |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
29 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
16 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Noah Ivers |
18 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Eva Blozik |
20 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Frank Konietschke |
30 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raija Sipila |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
30 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raija Sipila |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
11 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raija Sipila |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
16 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Raija Sipila |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
16 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
17 Aug 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
17 Aug 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-12-87 |
You can find further information about peer review here.