Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 9 Oct 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Doris Young |
| 3 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Elizabeth Denney-Wilson |
| 11 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jill Sherriff |
| 10 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gerd Ahlstrom |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 10 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 17 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Doris Young |
| 24 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jill Sherriff |
| 6 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gerd Ahlstrom |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 6 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 11 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gerd Ahlstrom |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 11 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 14 Feb 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gerd Ahlstrom |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 14 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 19 Feb 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 19 Feb 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-12-7 |
You can find further information about peer review here.