Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 13 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 14 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Pilgrim |
| 18 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Theo Lorenc |
| 13 Apr 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Barley |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 13 Apr 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 19 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Pilgrim |
| 19 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Theo Lorenc |
| 23 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Barley |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 23 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 26 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Barley |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 26 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 6 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Barley |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 6 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 7 Jun 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Barley |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 7 Jun 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 9 Jun 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 9 Jun 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-12-47 |
You can find further information about peer review here.