Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
5 Nov 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
4 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - michael kirby |
18 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Holt |
22 Dec 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lidewij Henneman |
16 Jan 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefan Neuner-jehle |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
16 Jan 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - michael kirby |
4 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lidewij Henneman |
18 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tim Holt |
4 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefan Neuner-jehle |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
4 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
19 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefan Neuner-jehle |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
19 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
27 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Stefan Neuner-jehle |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
27 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
5 Apr 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
5 Apr 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-12-15 |
You can find further information about peer review here.