Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
2 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
2 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Javier Garcia-Campayo |
13 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Barbara Tomenson |
18 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kurt Kroenke |
5 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Nader Haftgoli |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
5 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
5 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Nader Haftgoli |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
5 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
6 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Javier Garcia-Campayo |
16 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Barbara Tomenson |
21 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kurt Kroenke |
6 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Nader Haftgoli |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
6 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
14 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Nader Haftgoli |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
14 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
15 Sep 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
15 Sep 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-11-67 |
You can find further information about peer review here.