Peer Review reports
From: A study of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-9 in primary care elderly
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 17 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Matthew Hankins |
| 22 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Kurt Kroenke |
| 8 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Phelan |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 8 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 8 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Phelan |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 8 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 20 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Phelan |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 20 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 25 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Elizabeth Phelan |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 25 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 1 Sep 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
| 1 Sep 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-11-63 |
You can find further information about peer review here.