Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
4 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
10 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wim Opstelten |
11 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antonio Volpi |
11 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Barbara Yawn |
8 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jorge Navarro-Pérez |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
8 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
8 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jorge Navarro-Pérez |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
8 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
11 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Wim Opstelten |
23 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Antonio Volpi |
4 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Barbara Yawn |
11 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jorge Navarro-Pérez |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
11 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
11 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Jorge Navarro-Pérez |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
6 May 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
6 May 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-11-33 |
You can find further information about peer review here.