Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
30 Jan 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Francesca Dwamena |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
30 Jan 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Morriss |
28 Feb 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carolyn Chew-Graham |
5 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Lucassen |
16 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jenny Doust |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
9 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Francesca Dwamena |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
16 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carolyn Chew-Graham |
26 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Richard Morriss |
26 May 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Lucassen |
10 Jun 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jenny Doust |
20 Jul 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Francesca Dwamena |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
20 Jul 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
11 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Peter Lucassen |
31 Aug 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jenny Doust |
18 Sep 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Francesca Dwamena |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
18 Sep 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
21 Sep 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
21 Sep 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-10-67 |
You can find further information about peer review here.