Skip to main content

Table 5 Attitude towards DR screening

From: Knowledge, attitude, and practice pattern towards diabetic retinopathy screening among general practitioners in primary health centres in Jakarta, the capital of Indonesia

Attitude questions

Strongly disagree, n (%)

Disagree,

n (%)

Don’t know,

n (%)

Agree,

n (%)

Strongly agree, n (%)

Eye examination is only needed when vision is affected

16 (17.4)

64 (69.6)

1 (1.1)

11 (12)

0 (0.0)

All patients with diabetes should be referred to an ophthalmologist

1 (1.1)

13 (14.1)

3 (3.3)

36 (39.1)

39 (42.4)

Even though diabetes is controlled, patients still have to undergo routine eye examinations

0 (0.0)

1 (1.1)

3 (3.3)

34 (37)

54 (58.7)

If the doctor has told the patient with diabetes to come for routine follow-up, the patient will come

0 (0.0)

2 (2.2)

7 (7.6)

24 (26.1)

59 (64.1)

If diabetes is treated early, blindness due to DR can be prevented

1 (1.1)

0 (0)

1 (1.1)

11 (12.0)

79 (85.9)

Fundoscopic examination should be performed by an ophthalmologist only

5 (5.4)

51 (55.4)

7 (7.6)

20 (21.7)

9 (9.8)

Fundoscopic examination by a non-ophthalmologist can help detect diabetic retinopathy

2 (2.2)

7 (7.6)

9 (9.8)

41 (44.6)

33 (35.9)

Ophthalmology training in a medical school adequately equips the GP to manage patients with eye complaints

0 (0.0)

27 (29.3)

5 (5.4)

40 (43.5)

20 (21.7)

  1. DR, diabetic retinopathy; GP, general practitioner