Skip to main content

Table 2b Comparing physician participants of the QUALICOPC study to other physicians in the practice group, and Ontario primary care physicians

From: How do respondents of primary care surveys compare to typical users of primary care? A comparison of two surveys

 

Group 1: QUALICOPC physician respondents

Group 2: QUALICOPC physicians’ practice groups

Group 3:

Ontario primary care physicians

Standardized difference

Group 2 vs. 1

Group 3 vs. 1

 

N = 175

N = 2,507

N = 9,758

  

Sex, N (%)

     

 Female

98 (56.0)

1,177 (47.0)

4,110 (42.1)

0.18

0.28

 Male

77 (44.0)

1,330 (53.0)

5,642 (57.8)

0.18

0.28

Age, mean (SD)

49 (10)

51 (11)

51 (12)

0.19

0.20

Years in practice, mean (SD)

23 (11)

25 (12)

25 (13)

0.20

0.21

Canadian medical graduate, N (%)

     

 Yes

141 (80.6)

1,878 (74.9)

7,054 (72.3)

0.14

0.20

 No

34 (19.4)

629 (25.1)

2,698 (27.7)

0.14

0.20

Roster size, mean (SD)

1,257 (582)

1,126 (786)

1,120 (1,045)

0.19

0.16

Primary care model*, N (%)

     

Solo physicians

12 (6.9)

0

3,711 (38.0)

-

0.81

Group enhanced FFS (FHG)

44 (25.1)

1,117 (44.6)

2,415 (24.8)

0.42

0.01

Group capitated (FHN)

< 6

27 (1.1)

202 (2.1)

-

-

Group capitated (FHO)

38 (21.7)

401 (16.0)

1,765 (18.1)

0.15

0.09

Group capitated with team (FHT)

73 (41.7)

923 (36.8)

1,594 (16.3)

0.10

0.58

Other group

< 6

39 (1.6)

71 (0.7)

-

-

  1. SD, standard deviation; FHG, Family Health Group; FHN, Family Health Network; FHO, Family Health Organization; FHT, Family Health Team.
  2. *Primary care models are classified according to type of practice model and remuneration: solo physicians (including enhanced fee for service and fee for service), group enhanced fee for service (i.e. Family Health Group), group capitated (i.e. Family Health Organization), and group capitated with an allied health team (i.e. Family Health Team). Family Health Network and Other group models were not included in the analysis as they each had fewer than 6 physician respondents in the QUALICOPC.
  3. Source: Li A, Cronin S, Bai YQ, Walker K, Ammi M, Hogg W, et al. Assessing the representativeness of physician and patient respondents to a primary care survey using administrative data. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(77):1–10.