Data source | Measured and described concepts | References | Measurement time | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trainers’s training | Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | ||||||||||||
Pre- | Post- | T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T6 | T7 | T8 | T9 | ||||
Qualitative data | Professional practice guides | Expected practice in primary care clinics | Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux. 2019 Guide pratique à l’intention des travailleurs sociaux issus d’un établissement du réseau de la santé et des services sociaux et qui travaillent dans un groupe de médecine de famille ou un groupe de médecine de famille universitaire. p. 41. Guide pratique à l’intention des infirmières cliniciennes qui travaillent dans un groupe de médecine de famille ou un groupe de médecine de famille universitaire. p. 76. |  |  | x |  |  |  | x |  |  |  |  |  |
Logbooks | Training and support process deployment and activities carried out by clinical trainers and patient trainers | Guest, G., E.E. Namey and M.L. Mitchell, Collecting qualitative data: A field manual for applied research. 2013, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |
Focus groups with patients | Experience with care and services | Â | Â | x | Â | x | x | x | Â | x | x | Â | Â | ||
Focus groups with trainers, decision-makers, managers, physicians and continuous quality improvement agents | Implementation of the education intervention, its effects and process of assimilation of professional practices | Â | Â | x | Â | Â | x | x | Â | Â | x | Â | Â | ||
Focus groups with social workers and registered nurses | Â | Â | Â | x | Â | x | Â | x | Â | x | Â | Â | |||
Quantitative data | Self-administered questionnaire on trainers’ learning | - Confidence in applying learnings Visual scale 0–10 | Bandura, A., Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 2006. 5 (1): p. 307–337 | x | x |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | x | x |
- Intention to apply knowledge Analog visual scale 0–10 | Kirkpatrick, J.D. and W.K. Kirkpatrick, Kirkpatrick’s Four Levels of Training Evaluation. 2016: Association for Talent Development | x | x |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | x | x | ||
Self-administered questionnaire on clinician’s learning | - Response to training and trainer performance 5 yes/no questions | Kirkpatrick, D.L., Implementing the Four Levels: A Practical Guide for Effective Evaluation of Training Programs. 2009: ReadHowYouWant.Com |  |  | x | x |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |
Self-administered questionnaire on collaborative practices and scope of practice | - Collaborative practices 6 dimensions, 41 items Likert Scale 1–6 | Careau E, Paré L, Maziade J and S. Dumont, CoPIP: Évaluation des compétences à la collaboration interprofessionelle (v1.2).2014 |  |  | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |  |  | |
- Scope of nursing practice 26 activities, 6 dimensions, Likert scale 1–6 | Braithwaite, S. (2016). Measuring Scope of Practice Enactment among Primary Care Registered Nurses in Ontario (Doctoral dissertation). |  |  | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |  |  | ||
- Scope of social workers’ practice 75 activities, 4 dimensions Likert scale 1–6 | Delli-Colli, N., N. Dubuc, R. Hébert and M.-F. Dubois, Measuring Social-Work Activities with Older People. Practice, 2013. 25 (5): p. 281–296. |  |  | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x |  |  | ||
Self-administered sociodemographic questionnaire | - Home-made questionnaire 10 items | Â | x | Â | x | Â | Â | Â | x | Â | Â | Â | x | Â |