Can the implementation of family doctor contracted service enable the elderly to utilize primary health care services more equally? empirical evidence from Shandong, China

Table 4 Decomposition results of the contribution rate of each factor of the inequality of family doctor contracted service of the elderly

	First consultation rate		Physical examination rate		Healthy lifestyle guidance rate		Chronic disease management rate
	Contribution	%	Contribution	%	Contribution	%	Contribution	%
Financial status (reference level = Poorest)		45.86		38.93		48.49		42.85
Poorer	0.0081	22.1	0.0027	6.14	0.0090	11.68	0.0071	10.55
General	0.0027	10.89	0.0033	7.24	0.0113	13.96	0.0082	11.88
Richer	0.0028	6.60	0.0025	7.89	0.0130	14.66	0.0069	10.34
Richest	0.0030	6.27	0.0032	7.66	0.0086	8.19	0.0063	10.08
Gender (reference level)
Male		2.65		5.80		9.10		7.92
Female	0.0067	2.65	0.0075	5.80	0.0081	9.10	0.0086	7.92
Age (reference level)
65–69		3.70		8.40		3.51		3.28
70–79	0.0011	1.68	0.0030	3.17	0.0051	5.34	0.0029	1.57
80 and older	0.0019	2.02	0.0047	5.23	−0.0026	−1.83	0.0035	1.71
Education level (reference level)
Elementary school or below		52.2		55.21		56.10		57.81
Middle school	0.0142	21.29	0.0160	34.24	0.0152	24.75	0.0260	32.35
High school or above	0.0418	30.91	0.0104	20.97	0.0258	31.45	0.0176	25.46
Living situation (reference level)
Live alone)		−4.38		−10.89		−5.17		−13.15
Live with spouse/children	−0.00638	−4.38	− 0.0070	− 10.89	0.0046	− 5.17	− 0.0118	− 13.15
Place of residence (reference level)
Urban)		−17.95		−4.33		−11.73		−13.97
Rural	−0.0114	−17.95	− 0.0027	−4.33	− 0.0085	−11.73	−0.0102	− 13.97
Chronic disease (reference level)
Yes)		7.35		5.22		7.30		9.83
No	0.0091	7.35	0.0051	5.22	0.0062	7.30	0.0076	9.83
Self-evaluation of health condition (reference level)
Good		10.57		−2.60		−7.60		5.43
Fair	0.0062	6.14	0.0036	−1.36	0.0016	−2.23	0.0029	2.57
Poor	0.0053	4.44	0.0010	−1.24	0.0037	−5.37	0.0023	2.86

ISSN: 2731-4553