Skip to main content

Table 5 Poverty indicators, self-reported health status, and quality of life in participants who booked and attended a Legal Health Clinic appointment

From: Legal needs of patients attending an urban family practice in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: an observational study of a legal health clinic

 

Booked appointment

n = 94

Attended appointment

n = 69

n (%)

n (%)

Household Income: Low-Income Measure 503

 Above LIM 50

4 (12.5)

3 (11.1)

 Below LIM 50

28 (87.5)

24 (88.9)

 Total

32

27

Income Insecurity

 Yes

74 (78.7)

54 (78.3)

 No

20 (21.3)

15 (21.7)

 Total

94

69

Afford to Buy Medication

 Yes

38 (40.4)

29 (42.0)

 No

56 (59.6)

40 (58.0)

 Total

94

69

Food Insecurity

 Yes

51 (58.0)

37 (56.9)

 No

37 (42.0)

28 (43.1)

 Total

88

65

Housing Insecurity

 Yes

32 (36.8)

25 (39.1)

 No

55 (63.2)

39 (60.9)

 Total

88

64

Self-Reported Health Status

 Excellent/Very good

11 (12.4)

5 (7.7)

 Good/Fair

51 (57.3)

44 (67.7)

 Poor

27 (30.3)

16 (24.6)

 Total

89

65

Quality of Life

Mobility

 No problem

35 (41.2)

22 (34.4)

 Some/Severe problems

50 (58.8)

42 (65.6)

 Total

85

64

Self-care

 No problem

65 (75.6)

48 (75.0)

 Some/Severe problems

21 (24.4)

16 (25.0)

 Total

86

64

Performing usual activities

 No difficulty

23 (26.7)

14 (21.9)

 Some/Severe difficulty

63 (73.3)

50 (78.1)

 Total

86

64

Pain and discomfort

 None

13 (15.1)

9 (14.1)

 Some/Severe

73 (84.9)

55 (85.9)

 Total

86

64

Anxiety and depression

 None

18 (21.2)

16 (25.4)

 Some/Severe

67 (78.8)

47 (74.6)

 Total

85

63

  1. Note: 1 Participants with legal needs indicated by the Legal Health Check-Up survey; 2 p-value from Fisher’s Exact Test; 3Low Income Measure 50 (LIM-50) is the threshold for median (50th percentile) household income, adjusted for household size. Household size was asked on a follow-up survey, not baseline, so LIM-50 could only be calculated for 32 participants