Skip to main content

Table 3 Binary logistic regressions exploring the association between practitioner characteristics and (1) whether weight management advice was provided in mock consultation and (2) whether conversations would be initiated at overweight or obese Body Mass Index (BMI)

From: Weight assessment and the provision of weight management advice in primary care: a cross-sectional survey of self-reported practice among general practitioners and practice nurses in the United Kingdom

Variables/Reference categories

Provide advice to mock consultation BMI of 32?1,3,5

What BMI trigger weight management conversation? 2,4,6

AOR

95% CI

p

AOR

95% CI

p

Gender

 Female

REF

–

–

REF

–

–

 Male

0.70

0.55–0.89

0.004

0.59

0.46–0.76

< 0.001

Age

 18–39 years old

REF

–

n.s.

REF

–

n.s.

 40–59 years old (vs younger)

1.08

0.79–1.49

n.s.

1.20

0.86–1.67

n.s.

  > 60 years old (vs younger)

1.00

0.65–1.55

n.s.

0.77

0.49–1.21

n.s.

Country

 England

REF

–

0.024

REF

 

0.052

 Scotland (vs. Eng)

1.40

1.01–1.93

0.043

0.79

0.57–1.09

n.s.

 Wales (vs. Eng)

1.74

1.11–2.73

0.016

0.63

0.41–0.98

0.041

 Northern Ireland (vs. Eng)

0.95

0.57–1.58

n.s.

0.65

0.38–1.13

n.s.

Days in practice in week

 1–2 days

REF

–

n.s.

REF

–

n.s.

 3–4 days (vs. less often)

1.01

0.69–1.47

n.s.

0.81

0.53–1.21

n.s.

 5–6 days (vs. less often)

0.81

0.63–1.03

n.s.

1.11

0.85–1.45

n.s.

Health professional role

 Practice nurse

REF

–

–

REF

–

–

 General practitioner

0.59

0.47–0.75

< 0.001

0.59

0.47–0.76

< 0.001

Years qualified

 0–5 years

REF

–

n.s.

REF

–

n.s.

 6–10 years (vs. more recent)

0.91

0.61–1.35

n.s.

0.90

0.60–1.37

n.s.

 11–15 years (vs. more recent)

0.95

0.70–1.30

n.s.

0.80

0.57–1.10

n.s.

 16–20 years (vs. more recent)

0.92

0.65–1.31

n.s.

0.86

0.60–1.23

n.s.

  > 20 years (vs. more recent)

1.02

0.77–1.35

n.s.

0.89

0.66–1.20

n.s.

List size

  < 2000 patients.

REF

–

n.s.

REF

–

n.s.

 2000–5000 patients (vs less)

1.30

0.77–2.18

n.s.

1.20

0.67–2.11

n.s.

 5000–10,000 patients (vs less)

1.12

0.83–1.51

n.s.

1.09

0.79–1.52

n.s.

 10,000–20,000 patients (vs less)

1.21

0.95–1.53

n.s.

0.90

0.70–1.16

n.s.

  > 20,000 patients (vs less)

0.77

0.51–1.17

n.s.

1.14

0.73–1.79

n.s.

  1. Notes
  2. Base = All participants; AOR = Adj. Odds Ratio; 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval, n.s. non-significant (p > 0.05)
  3. Data are not weighted, as country included as a covariate
  4. 1 DV = Provided advice, conversation or referral in response to prompt (Yes = 1; No = 0).
  5. 2 DV = Min BMI that would trigger weight conversation (Overweight = 1; Obese = 0).
  6. 3 Test of coefficients, χ2(17) = 95.21, p < 0.001; Hosmer & Lemeshow, χ2(8) = 12.43, p = 0.13, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.06.
  7. 4 Test of coefficients, χ2(17) = 108.18,p < 0.001; Hosmer & Lemeshow, χ2(7) = 2.86, p = 0.90, Nagelkerke R2 = 0.08.
  8. 5 Cases excluded due to missing data on one or more variable (n = 68).
  9. 6 Cases excluded due to missing data on one or more variable (n = 193).