Skip to main content

Table 1 Socio-economic position and patient’s travel distance to first specialised cancer facility in the study population (numbers vary due to missing data)

From: Patient’s travel distance to specialised cancer diagnostics and the association with the general practitioner’s diagnostic strategy and satisfaction with the access to diagnostic procedures: an observational study in Denmark

 

N

(%)

Total

3155

(100)

Age, median (IQR)

70 (61–76)

 

Sex

 Female

1507

(47.8)

 Male

1648

(52.2)

Education

 Low

996

(32.4)

 Middle

1399

(45.5)

 High

678

(22.1)

Marital status

 Married/cohabiting

1976

(63.4)

 Living alone

1143

(36.6)

GP’s suspicion of cancer or serious illness

 No

1084

(35.0)

 Yes

2013

(64.0)

Cancer type

 Breast cancer

448

(14.2)

 Gynaecological cancer

165

(5.2)

 Cancer in the male genitals

491

(15.6)

 Cancer in the digestive system

726

(23.0)

 Cancer in the respiratory system

443

(14.0)

 Haematological cancer and lymphomas

227

(7.2)

 Malignant melanoma

237

(7.5)

 Others

418

(13.3)

Distancea(km), median (IQR)

18 (6–34)

 

Distancea(km) categorical

 0–6

785

(25.0)

  > 6–18

778

(24.7)

  > 18–34

778

(24.7)

  > 34–49

493

(15.6)

  > 49

321

(10.2)

  1. aTravel distance from the residence of the patient to the patient’s first specialised cancer facility