Skip to main content

Table 3 The comparison of Specialist LINK awareness and utilization between those physicians with < 5 years of experience and those with 5 or more years of experience

From: Specialist LINK and primary care network clinical pathways - a new approach to patient referral: a cross-sectional survey of awareness, utilization and usability among family physicians in Calgary

 

< 5 years n (%)

= > 5 years n (%)

Chi-square Statistics

P-value

Awareness of Specialist LINK

  

6.39

0.01*

 Yes

77 (96.2%)

128 (85.3%)

  

 No

3 (3.8%)

22 (14.7%)

  

Used Specialist LINK

  

0.05

0.83

 Yes

58 (72.5%)

91 (71.1%)

  

 No

22 (27.5%)

37 (28.9%)

  

Number of times accessed

  

0.01

0.95

 Haven’t used it

2 (3.3%)

8 (7.8%)

  

 1–2 times

15 (24.6%)

25 (24.3%)

  

 3–5 times

25 (41.0%)

28 (27.2%)

  

  > 5 times

19 (31.1%)

42 (40.7%)

  

Improvement in patient management

  

0.73

0.39

 Yes

57 (77.0%)

85 (71.4%)

  

 No

17 (23.0%)

34 (28.6%)

  

Effectiveness of Specialist LINK

Mean (SD)

8.20 (1.46)

8.15 (1.84)

0.83a

0.36

n = 65

n = 110

  

Awareness of Clinical Pathways

  

0.00

0.97

 Yes

43 (55.1%)

79 (54.9%)

  

 No

35 (44.9%)

65 (45.1%)

  

Accessed Clinical Pathways

  

1.62

0.20

 Yes

42 (87.5%)

66 (78.6%)

  

 No

6 (12.5%)

18 (21.4%)

  

Number of times used

  

0.64

0.43

 Haven’t used it

6 (12.8%)

12 (16.2%)

  

 1–2 times

12 (25.5%)

10 (13.5%)

  

 3–5 times

15 (31.9%)

22 (29.7%)

  

  > 5 times

14 (29.8%)

30 (40.6%)

  

Change in practice

  

0.01

0.93

 Yes

37 (80.4%)

59 (79.7%)

  

 No

9 (19.6%)

15 (20.3%)

  

Effectiveness of Clinical Pathways

Mean (SD)

7.83 (1.69)

8.06 (1.54)

0.47a

0.49

n = 41

n = 65

  
  1. *Significant differences (p < 0.05)
  2. aT-test was used for comparison
  3. SD Standard Deviation